SolomonSouth
Member
So how many 69s exist at this point?
Do GBRf locos have a nominal depot allocation ?The consensus appears to be that the 69s will be operating from Tonbridge Yard. Is that just going to be a few of them, or are all 69s going to be based there? And which depot are they allocated to? Many thanks
So how many 69s exist at this point?
I would argue at least three based on 69003 having run on the main line on it's own, albeit not too far. I am guessing 69004 qand 69005 have got their engines in and maybe already been powered up. ISTR one of the 69s was dragged to Eastleigh to be painted, with an empty cab !! Perhaps fitting out the cabs is one of the final jobs.Two at the moment with one more close to livery application
Thanks mateTwo at the moment with one more close to livery application
Mountfield? Assuming a 69 would fit.A clue might be in what 66/7s do at Tonbridge outside RHTT sesason.
Great. Get these nice 'new' locos out and covered in filth right away!Both 69001 and 69002 were out in RHTT duties around South London, Surrey and Sussex today covering for a pair of unavailable 73s.
Not really. They did an RHTT the other day with success, should have the first two on Kent spare RHTT in a couple weeks.So the [first two] 69s are very much in service now?
RHTT is service, no?Not really. They did an RHTT the other day with success, should have the first two on Kent spare RHTT in a couple weeks.
Well it was a trial so it’s not “in service”.RHTT is service, no?
Or, if you're feeling slightly more optimistic, that one loco can haul three wagonsGood to see 2 locos can haul 2 wagons![]()
Wonder how the AWS/TPWS would interface with caveman feet..!Look closely; you can see the driver's feet running, Flintstones style.
Yabadabadoo!
Whoa, not too soon dude!It appears another path for 69003 to head to Eastleigh yesterday was cancelled - 3rd time lucky maybe?!?
Whoa, not too soon dude!
I only classed 'em yesterday
(Assuming just 001 & 002 make up the class).
I wouldn't worry about it as you'll have seen 69003 within a few weeks no doubt......oh wait, but by then 69004 might be registered on TOPS.........What a dilemma...![]()
![]()
Stop it! Just stop it!![]()
![]()
Just spotted it passing by our house (0.5 miles south of Reddish South) double heading with 60076 working 6E17 Liverpool - Drax Biomass service. Still unpainted and service running approximately 40 mins down at this point according to RTT, by the sound of things the 60 leading was doing all the work!
On another note, has anyone heard when the next planned move for 69003 is yet?
I'm not surprised, looking at it on Flickr it appears to be dead anyway (nothing's plugged into the Multi socket and I don't believe they can Multi anyway?)Just spotted it passing by our house (0.5 miles south of Reddish South) double heading with 60076 working 6E17 Liverpool - Drax Biomass service. Still unpainted and service running approximately 40 mins down at this point according to RTT, by the sound of things the 60 leading was doing all the work!
Interesting point regarding the windows, hadn’t noticed that as it passed by. What would be the likely purpose of the locos inclusion in this service?I'm not surprised, looking at it on Flickr it appears to be dead anyway (nothing's plugged into the Multi socket and I don't believe they can Multi anyway?)
Of note with 003, is that it retains it's Romanian Cab windows as well - I would have thought, like the 66s, they'd have standardised those!
![]()
69003 6E17 Winwick
60076 ‘Dunbar’ + 69003 at Winwick on 6E17 13:02 Liverpool Bulk Terminal – Drax Power Station biomass hoppers on 30/10/21.flickr.com
No idea if I'm honest, given it was due to head down to Eastleigh for repainting. Perhaps it's being trip worked later on and attaching it to this was a move to set it up for later?Interesting point regarding the windows, hadn’t noticed that as it passed by. What would be the likely purpose of the locos inclusion in this service?
What is the difference, please, for those of us who have no clue? I know the (now removed on class 69) nose end grilles were different on Romanian versions.it retains it's Romanian Cab windows as well
What is the difference, please, for those of us who have no clue? I know the (now removed on class 69) nose end grilles were different on Romanian versions.
Oh, I see, thanks.On the Romanian built examples, the cab side windows were a two piece set up, with the small non opening window framed by a large rubber gasket - On the British built examples, it used a single window frame for both windows similar to the Class 47s.