I’m afraid this is all pie in the sky, crayonista thinking.
The 2-min specification referred to the physical couple/uncouple process, which the train does achieve. The wider allowance required for wheels-stop to wheels start, which also includes dwell, cab actions, driver movement and dispatch procedure, takes 8 mins for uncoupling, and 6 mins for coupling, as absolute minimums.
Crayonista?
The post speculates on ways of more effectively using the fleet and reducing costs without the uncoupling (having acknowledged the restrictions at Oxford), whilst maintaining customer satisfaction.
You’ve clearly never negotiated contract addendums. ATP isn’t an excuse to make clauses totally redundant, and it’s not as if Hitachi has performed well in all areas! There’s room for negotiation- like the 800s not returning to Hitachi depots each day.
And it’s not my crayons making rumours of 7 cars. It’s publicly known that GWR is not happy with the current fleet mix, particularly if it has to meet DfT cost savings. This might be a means to a better place.
Are there seriously rumours to that effect?
110mp 387s replacing 800s doesn't make sense and they couldn't go further than Brickyard (do 800s go further between runs?).
No way they will allow the political uproar of down grading the service between two of the three capitals on the mainland!
I would say, this is a rumour someone without much common sense has started!
It would also mean the services must be cancelled when the tunnel is shut, again, completely non-sensical!
Yes, but again not my rumours. Just bringing together what has been reported across the industry media. Many ideas get discussed and some obviously won’t go ahead.
The tunnel has Swansea services - there would be a service and the full 2 per hour never runs via Gloucester.
TfL taking all the slows has definitely been discussed. Might not happen, but if it does there will be surplus 387s.