Jacob Porrett
Member
Article in the RAIL MagazineWhere is that mentioned? Have they even started driver/guard training?
Article in the RAIL MagazineWhere is that mentioned? Have they even started driver/guard training?
I believe it’s a nearly 2 year old article on the website, and never been updated, so I wouldn’t really worry about what they originally assumed…I notice in this SWR article they say "Once the first train arrives on the Reading route".
One wonders the significance of the word "train" (singular).??
I read that as they aim to have a plan by June 30th dictating how and when they will introduce them by.Article in the RAIL Magazine
This is the article that I read.I read that as they aim to have a plan by June 30th dictating how and when they will introduce them by.
I believe GBRf drivers are involved in the testing. No SWR driver managers or drivers have yet had training.Out of pure curiosity, would it be possible for SWR to use the same drivers that are testing the units for passenger service?
That is what I read. As I wrote above, I see the June date as when they Weill have a plan of how and when they are going to introduce them.This is the article that I read.
Yeah I see that now, I should've guessed by the Feltham depot article below it not being updated since May 2020.!I believe it’s a nearly 2 year old article on the website, and never been updated, so I wouldn’t really worry about what they originally assumed…
This is the article that I read.
Source: RAIL magazineSWR's delayed Arterio trains have "service plan by June 30"
South Western Railway's new Class 701 Arterio trains could finally enter passenger service later this year - nearly three years late.
The Department for Transport said it had "increased confidence" in the delivery of the Derby-built trains and that it “expects a final entry into service plan by June 30 2022”.
It was responding to a request under the Freedom of Information Act by SWR passenger Rich Williams, which he shared with RAIL. He also asked the DfT to list the main problems that have been preventing introduction of the trains, and was given more information than has previously been published.
The DfT stated that the biggest problem “has been the inconsistency of the software to improve the performance and reliability of the trains”.
It added: “The issues experienced are not consistent on every unit. Core activities such as splitting and joining and train preparation have proved challenging.”
Other problems during testing have included:
The trains were built by Bombardier, which has since been taken over by Alstom. DfT said that Alstom is "providing regular, targeted software drops to address these concerns" and that a team from SWR has been conducting "a comprehensive series of tests”.
- Computer control unit issues.
- Passenger information screen irregularities.
- Configuration irregularities.
- Wheel slide protection faults.
- Driver machine interface merging issues.
There will be additional software upgrades between now and July. But the company has "provisionally accepted" the first batch of trains.
Driver training has yet to start, and the DfT recognises there are outstanding issues with unions.
Although other variants of are Bombardier's Aventra trains have been delivered late, none match the scale of problems encountered with the £1 billion SWR order for 750 vehicles in 90 trains.
The fleet was expected to take over suburban and Reading and Windsor Lines services from 2019 and be maintained at Wimbledon depot. It is widely believed that the operator is struggling to have sufficient rolling stock available.
SWR has agreed a short-term lease extension on part of its Class 707 fleet, that had been due to transfer to Southeastern.
Class 458 trains currently used on Reading-Waterloo services are due to start a programme of upgrades this year, in preparation for taking over Portsmouth duties from Class 450 Desiros. And older Class 455 suburban trains have been withdrawn.
Yes Service Plan……I do not read that as an entry to service date.Source: RAIL magazine
Indeed. Confusion aside however, it does mean we are finally getting a little closer to actually seeing one of the most delayed fleets finally enter service - it'll be interesting to see what their plan entails. Certainly sounds like no turning back now.Yes Service Plan……I do not read that as an entry to service date.
A note on this article: It says that the 455 sets have been withdrawn, which isn't strictly true. AFAIK only 4 units have been returned to Porterbrook, the rest remain either in service or as spares donors. SWR cannot really go further with any withdrawls without compromising diagrams, at least with no new trains to replace them.This is the article that I read.
Have to wait and see. At least it's positive news.That is what I read. As I wrote above, I see the June date as when they Weill have a plan of how and when they are going to introduce them.
Not that they will be in service by June 30th.
Two have already gone to scrap. Not sure on the others.A note on this article: It says that the 455 sets have been withdrawn, which isn't strictly true. AFAIK only 4 units have been returned to Porterbrook, the rest remain either in service or as spares donors. SWR cannot really go further with any withdrawls without compromising diagrams, at least with no new trains to replace them.
Positive news at lastIndeed. Confusion aside however, it does mean we are finally getting a little closer to actually seeing one of the most delayed fleets finally enter service - it'll be interesting to see what their plan entails. Certainly sounds like no turning back now.
Why should it take a FoI request to get some honesty out of SWR and DfT over these trains. About time SWR communicated better with its passengers given it needs them more than ever now.Source: RAIL magazine
I remember Reading in the agreement that all door control would be lostWasn't this a result of the recent DOO RMT settlement? Sounds similar to Greater Anglia and Merseyrail as unlike Southern they remain more useful and safety crit plus guaranteed
“The issues experienced are not consistent on every unit. Core activities such as splitting and joining and train preparation have proved challenging.”
Obviously this is a big problem with the five car subfleet, but surely the ten car units are very unlikely to split and join simply because there wouldn't be the capacity to platform a 20 car class 701. so perhaps the ten car units need a different focus ?
No they haven’t.Where is that mentioned? Have they even started driver/guard training?
They won’t be in the end, drivers wanted guards to be able to close in case of any issues so they’ve gone with thatI remember Reading in the agreement that all door control would be lost
Introduction to the Class 701 yesterday at Waterloo. Had the opportunity to be taken around the unit and look at the various onboard systems. Great progress being made by the project team and it won't be long before we start seeing these introduced into service.
The May 2022 unit diagrams for SWR have been produced on the basis of having no 701s or 707s in traffic. It will mean more shortening of mainline services to free up 450s but the plan is definitely there.Might the deadline to have a workable plan in place by the end of June be related to the planned departure date of the remaining 707s? If they transfer to Southeastern in August, which I think is still the intention, SWR will be even shorter of suburban stock.
Evidence of tangible progress at last!
I thought they had been quite vocal about intending for them to operate under DCO?They could’ve given the front a quick clean
Also surprised to see the GOP panel left wide open where someone from the RMT might see it. I thought contents were supposed to be secret, after all they still haven’t revealed how these trains will operate in regard to guards involvement.
Also haven’t they been saying "it won't be long" for months and months now?Evidence of tangible progress at last!
It’s nice to see that it already comes with layers of black and yellow hazard tape. A new feature from Derby perhaps - we’ll sort of build it, you fix it?They could’ve given the front a quick clean
Also surprised to see the GOP panel left wide open where someone from the RMT might see it. I thought contents were supposed to be secret, after all they still haven’t revealed how these trains will operate in regard to guards involvement.
The dispute with the RMT has been resolved for some time. It's never been a secret that there's GOPs, where they are or what's in them.They could’ve given the front a quick clean
Also surprised to see the GOP panel left wide open where someone from the RMT might see it. I thought contents were supposed to be secret, after all they still haven’t revealed how these trains will operate in regard to guards involvement.
It's part of the WorstGroup influence on the franchise - Laira must have had a consignment that was too much even for them to use and they've sent a load to Wimbledon.It’s nice to see that it already comes with layers of black and yellow hazard tape. A new feature from Derby perhaps - we’ll sort of build it, you fix it?
It's part of the WorstGroup influence on the franchise - Laira must have had a consignment that was too much even for them to use and they've sent a load to Wimbledon.