• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Worst Rail Routes for fare collection in members' experience?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Kite159

Veteran Member
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
19,317
Location
West of Andover
St Ives branch rarely sees tickets checked in my experience. Had a free journey from Lelant into St Ives this afternoon on a lightly loaded train. The other 6 who got on at Lelant no doubt did not pay either.
Although isn't there normally a revenue block at St Ives during the summer months, both for revenue and to ensure the platform doesn't get too overcrowded?

Although maybe one for @RPI ?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

RPI

Established Member
Joined
6 Dec 2010
Messages
2,768
Although isn't there normally a revenue block at St Ives during the summer months, both for revenue and to ensure the platform doesn't get too overcrowded?

Although maybe one for @RPI ?
Tired of banging my head against a wall with that part of the world I'm afraid, not wanting to delve to much into the internal politics but some depots are managed better than others. Take from that what you will!
 

43066

Established Member
Joined
24 Nov 2019
Messages
9,535
Location
London
Although isn't there normally a revenue block at St Ives during the summer months, both for revenue and to ensure the platform doesn't get too overcrowded?

Although maybe one for @RPI ?

Tired of banging my head against a wall with that part of the world I'm afraid, not wanting to delve to much into the internal politics but some depots are managed better than others. Take from that what you will!

Presumably there is an assumption that most will be bound to/from London, hence will encounter barriers eventually?
 

RPI

Established Member
Joined
6 Dec 2010
Messages
2,768
Presumably there is an assumption that most will be bound to/from London, hence will encounter barriers eventually?
The vast majority of travellers on the St Ives branch are day trippers using the park and ride from St Erth. You actually encounter very few long distance passengers on there proportionately, most getting Taxis from St Erth.
 

WL113

Member
Joined
9 Jun 2010
Messages
209
Location
Rugeley, Staffordshire
The Rugeley-Walsall-Birmingham New Street route must be one of the top contenders here. 'It's free on the train' is often said in Rugeley when discussing travel to Cannock/Hednesford etc. Maybe that explains WMT's attitude to Rugeley... Very often services are turned back at Hednesford if they are a few minutes late.

Ticket checks on the line are very rare. Obviously there are barriers to go though at New Street but even those are often open. Travel between the other stations on the line is pretty much a free for all. The line must be losing a lot of money.
 

Chriso

Member
Joined
7 Dec 2006
Messages
335
The Rugeley-Walsall-Birmingham New Street route must be one of the top contenders here. 'It's free on the train' is often said in Rugeley when discussing travel to Cannock/Hednesford etc. Maybe that explains WMT's attitude to Rugeley... Very often services are turned back at Hednesford if they are a few minutes late.

Ticket checks on the line are very rare. Obviously there are barriers to go though at New Street but even those are often open. Travel between the other stations on the line is pretty much a free for all. The line must be losing a lot of money.
There used to be a small group of assistant ticket inspectors routinely used on the route until electrification.

The idiot management at London Midland decided to get rid of them . I encountered one during his last few weeks around Cannock and he said the line would become a free for all. Another great LM legacy
 

RPI

Established Member
Joined
6 Dec 2010
Messages
2,768
There used to be a small group of assistant ticket inspectors routinely used on the route until electrification.

The idiot management at London Midland decided to get rid of them . I encountered one during his last few weeks around Cannock and he said the line would become a free for all. Another great LM legacy
I've always wondered why more TOC'S don't have Ticket Examiners*, generally not on massive wages but earn commission. Certainly on GWR we make use of them and they bring in a lot of money, especially in the West.

*Different TOC'S have different job titles but effectively a member of staff checking/selling tickets in addition to the guard, but not quite an RPI.
 

Kite159

Veteran Member
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
19,317
Location
West of Andover
I've always wondered why more TOC'S don't have Ticket Examiners*, generally not on massive wages but earn commission. Certainly on GWR we make use of them and they bring in a lot of money, especially in the West.

*Different TOC'S have different job titles but effectively a member of staff checking/selling tickets in addition to the guard, but not quite an RPI.
Especially for those routes which operates with pairs of units which don't have gangways and the instruction for the guard is to stay in the rear unit.
 

markymark2000

On Moderation
Joined
11 May 2015
Messages
3,589
Location
Western Part of the UK
I've always wondered why more TOC'S don't have Ticket Examiners*, generally not on massive wages but earn commission. Certainly on GWR we make use of them and they bring in a lot of money, especially in the West.

*Different TOC'S have different job titles but effectively a member of staff checking/selling tickets in addition to the guard, but not quite an RPI.
Any service which has frequent stops or runs as a multiple unit with the guard unable to be in part of the train should have another member of staff to check tickets.

I'd also say we need to get ticket barriers operational for more hours. I've never seen ticket gates open as much as I have done in the past few months and there seems to be an unwillingness to build more ticket barriers.
 

L401CJF

Established Member
Joined
16 Oct 2019
Messages
1,486
Location
Wirral
Any service which has frequent stops or runs as a multiple unit with the guard unable to be in part of the train should have another member of staff to check tickets.

I'd also say we need to get ticket barriers operational for more hours. I've never seen ticket gates open as much as I have done in the past few months and there seems to be an unwillingness to build more ticket barriers.
Wolverhampton is one that seems to be open 9 times out of 10 and really annoys me. Wide open in the morning and evening rush both days I've worked down there in the last week. Really annoying as there's so many who avoid paying down that way on our trains as it is, no chance of me getting to all of them!

Not much use when they're in operation either to be honest. I had a guy on not long ago who's a regular evader, hiding in the bog going on about "the system" and all that so I gave up with him in the end. He jumped off at Wolverhampton. I watched him go to the wide gate with the staff member on it, who just let him through anyway almost immediately.

Clearly they know not to waste their time on him too!
 

185

Established Member
Joined
29 Aug 2010
Messages
5,027
I also think prioritising BTP for revenue is a horrendous waste; I'd far rather they prioritised dealing with the violent, too drunk, and dangerous offenders rather than one that's simply skipped a fare.
Disagree. At one operator, on a number of revenue blocks over a trial period of of four weeks, a very high number of people were picked up for: wanted on warrant, breach of bail, possession of huge amount drugs, violence, drunk and incapable weapons & stolen property, immigration - all of these found whilst dodging fares of £2.50 to £4. One was wanted for, and subsequently convicted of murder.

The thing that brought a stop to these ops was a certain senior police officer who claimed these ops were 'heavily distorting the figures' and stated "we're not there to be your security thugs".

My opinion - BTP has truly lost its way in recent years.
 

Bikeman78

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2018
Messages
4,601
The Rugeley-Walsall-Birmingham New Street route must be one of the top contenders here. 'It's free on the train' is often said in Rugeley when discussing travel to Cannock/Hednesford etc. Maybe that explains WMT's attitude to Rugeley... Very often services are turned back at Hednesford if they are a few minutes late.

Ticket checks on the line are very rare. Obviously there are barriers to go though at New Street but even those are often open. Travel between the other stations on the line is pretty much a free for all. The line must be losing a lot of money.
The 153+170 combinations were a fare dodgers dream. The guard was always in the 170 so the dodgers went in the 153.
 

markymark2000

On Moderation
Joined
11 May 2015
Messages
3,589
Location
Western Part of the UK
Disagree. At one operator, on a number of revenue blocks over a trial period of of four weeks, a very high number of people were picked up for: wanted on warrant, breach of bail, possession of huge amount drugs, violence, drunk and incapable weapons & stolen property, immigration - all of these found whilst dodging fares of £2.50 to £4. One was wanted for, and subsequently convicted of murder.

The thing that brought a stop to these ops was a certain senior police officer who claimed these ops were 'heavily distorting the figures' and stated "we're not there to be your security thugs".

My opinion - BTP has truly lost its way in recent years.
So much I could say on BTP but it isn't relevant. Waste of time though summarises it for me.

To back up your point though, TFGM and Greater Manchester Police did a Travelsafe operation increasing visibility of the police on public transport to deter anti social behaviour etc, here are their results from Twitter (I've put the figures together and quoted them as text as it's all on photos on twitter)

In 3 days:
82 arrests
158 vehicles seized
3138 Metrolink fines issued
3 court summons
138 stop searches
4 drug seizures
6 drug warnings
 

Chucky

Member
Joined
25 Mar 2022
Messages
45
Location
London
In 3 days:
82 arrests
158 vehicles seized
3138 Metrolink fines issued
3 court summons
138 stop searches
4 drug seizures
6 drug warnings

Which all equals more work for them. Hence why they don't want to do it. Better to ignore it, that way their figures look better. If the crimes aren't detected and recorded then as far as the BTP and the bean counters are concerned, they don't exist and don't need to be acted upon.

I've witnessed a number of these 'sting' operations over the years and thought they were a good thing. Current attitude in this country seems to be brush all the problems under the rug and then pretend we can't smell the festering stink under our feet that, sooner or later, we'll one day have to face up to.
 

uglymonkey

Member
Joined
10 Aug 2018
Messages
480
What's weird is that its not consistent, Exmouth - Exeter always has tickets checks on the train ( even if units in multiple), but Thameslink ( or SouthEastern you never see anyone)
 

Edsmith

Member
Joined
21 Dec 2021
Messages
569
Location
Staplehurst
Disagree. At one operator, on a number of revenue blocks over a trial period of of four weeks, a very high number of people were picked up for: wanted on warrant, breach of bail, possession of huge amount drugs, violence, drunk and incapable weapons & stolen property, immigration - all of these found whilst dodging fares of £2.50 to £4. One was wanted for, and subsequently convicted of murder.

The thing that brought a stop to these ops was a certain senior police officer who claimed these ops were 'heavily distorting the figures' and stated "we're not there to be your security thugs".

My opinion - BTP has truly lost its way in recent years.
I think BTP are to some extent damned whatever they do but I think most people would rather see them proactively dealing with violent offenders and the like rather than standing around chatting as they inevitably would be for much of the time on ticket checks.

What's weird is that its not consistent, Exmouth - Exeter always has tickets checks on the train ( even if units in multiple), but Thameslink ( or SouthEastern you never see anyone)
There were occasional ticket checks on Southeastern before covid but they’re almost non existent now.

I was surprised though to see the ticket barriers at Chatham in use yesterday, there was only a half hourly Thameslink service through the station because of industrial action.
 
Last edited:

Sealink

Member
Joined
16 Aug 2006
Messages
158
Yesterday, I happened to talk to a chappie from Wem. He said that, if seeking to go for a night out in Shrewsbury, taking the train was a 'no brainer' - it was more expensive to park the car than pay any fares, and, of course, he could have a drink without worrying about the breathaliser. He also said that nobody ever buys a ticket on the evening trains back, as no conducter ever comes around. (Presumably Shrewsbury is ungated in the evenings?)

Last month we had this post from @class26:


We've also had mention of massive fare evasion on some Scottish routes, not helped by the increased difficulty in prosecuting offenders caused by Scottish law. I assum this is also a disincentive to conductors to try to get all fares due, especially on late night services when the chances of violence/fracas increases.

This got me wondering - which GB route in this group's esteemed members' experience has the worst fare collection rates, and on which trains? And how much of a difference does this make to the DfT station entrance-exit stats, with potential knock-on effect in terms of lack of improved service enhancement?

I can't remember ever having a ticket checked on Thameslink, and they serve ungated stations.
 

RPI

Established Member
Joined
6 Dec 2010
Messages
2,768
What's weird is that its not consistent, Exmouth - Exeter always has tickets checks on the train ( even if units in multiple), but Thameslink ( or SouthEastern you never see anyone)
The vast majority of early trains (up until around 12:00) have a Ticket Examiner rostered as well as the guard, we RPI'S also often work an Exmouth service either as part of many trips or to fill in before/after a London.

We've done a few station blocks along there too over the past few weeks, one evening one at Polsloe Bridge was very worthwhile last week.
 

david1212

Established Member
Joined
9 Apr 2020
Messages
1,483
Location
Midlands
Disagree. At one operator, on a number of revenue blocks over a trial period of of four weeks, a very high number of people were picked up for: wanted on warrant, breach of bail, possession of huge amount drugs, violence, drunk and incapable weapons & stolen property, immigration - all of these found whilst dodging fares of £2.50 to £4. One was wanted for, and subsequently convicted of murder.

The thing that brought a stop to these ops was a certain senior police officer who claimed these ops were 'heavily distorting the figures' and stated "we're not there to be your security thugs".

My opinion - BTP has truly lost its way in recent years.

Which all equals more work for them. Hence why they don't want to do it. Better to ignore it, that way their figures look better. If the crimes aren't detected and recorded then as far as the BTP and the bean counters are concerned, they don't exist and don't need to be acted upon.

I've witnessed a number of these 'sting' operations over the years and thought they were a good thing. Current attitude in this country seems to be brush all the problems under the rug and then pretend we can't smell the festering stink under our feet that, sooner or later, we'll one day have to face up to.

I think BTP are to some extent damned whatever they do but I think most people would rather see them proactively dealing with violent offenders and the like rather than standing around chatting as they inevitably would be for much of the time on ticket checks.

Hmmmm .....
IMO the BTP certainly should not be doing straight forward revenue protection but given if well run the checks are also picking up a significant number of other offences their involvent seems valid.

Regarding the two sentences I have highlighted in bold surely why the police are there. If "we're not there to be your security thugs" was "we're not there to be your queue control" i.e. no offences then yes down to the railway to manage either in-house or by contracting. If significant verbal abuse, physical abuse, violence, vandalism etc. then the BTP need to be involved. Following on if they pickup people already wanted or find additional offences e.g. drugs, weapons that has to be a good thing.
 

ChiefPlanner

Established Member
Joined
6 Sep 2011
Messages
7,795
Location
Herts
Mentioned many times before , but full ticket checks on the North London line and the Watford DC reaped a rich harvest of bail and warrant skippers , a few drugs possessions and a couple of stolen bikes / property. (plus a significant revenue boost for a while) - certain people chose not to travel. This on a Friday and Saturday evening.

The then Chief Superintendant of BTP , an excellent chap , expressed satisfaction for the excercise and it was repeated serveral times , and on other London Metro routes.
 

uglymonkey

Member
Joined
10 Aug 2018
Messages
480
Actually got my ticket checked on the train from New Eltham to London Bridge last night ! 2nd time in 6 months !
 

Route115?

Member
Joined
26 Jun 2021
Messages
232
Location
Ruislip
Chiltern relies entirely on barriers and Marylebone is nearly always manned. I don't think that i have had my ticket checked on an inner service in the last year.
 

Watershed

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
26 Sep 2020
Messages
12,189
Location
UK
Chiltern relies entirely on barriers and Marylebone is nearly always manned. I don't think that i have had my ticket checked on an inner service in the last year.
They do have some roving RPIs, and a handful of services south of Banbury have guards rostered (generally as pass rides to/from the 68 hauled services, which require guards). But yes, most checks are barrier based, as all south of Banbury (other than 68 hauled/West Ealing) are DOO.
 
Last edited:

RPI

Established Member
Joined
6 Dec 2010
Messages
2,768
SWR west of Salisbury is pretty bad, on my daily commute I've been checked a handful of times, this also shows in a professional capacity to as we catch at least two or three "Pinhoe's" per day when we work at Exeter Central, this is where we scan E Tickets from Pinhoe and check the purchase time and ask some questions if it was bought in the last few minutes, with these so far 100% end up in MG11 where they have mostly come from Honiton/Axminster and as far as Andover!
Quite often in conversation the person will admit that they do it because no one ever checks tickets on that line.
 

LowLevel

Established Member
Joined
26 Oct 2013
Messages
7,634
SWR west of Salisbury is pretty bad, on my daily commute I've been checked a handful of times, this also shows in a professional capacity to as we catch at least two or three "Pinhoe's" per day when we work at Exeter Central, this is where we scan E Tickets from Pinhoe and check the purchase time and ask some questions if it was bought in the last few minutes, with these so far 100% end up in MG11 where they have mostly come from Honiton/Axminster and as far as Andover!
Quite often in conversation the person will admit that they do it because no one ever checks tickets on that line.
I used to use the then SWT train to Exeter quite often because it was free for me using passes - don't remember ever not seeing a guard on there, they were generally pretty good all over their network.

I think there is quite a lot in weak management letting people get into lazy habits that they don't bother attempting to correct across the network. Far easier to leave it be.
 

Edsmith

Member
Joined
21 Dec 2021
Messages
569
Location
Staplehurst
I used to use the then SWT train to Exeter quite often because it was free for me using passes - don't remember ever not seeing a guard on there, they were generally pretty good all over their network.

I think there is quite a lot in weak management letting people get into lazy habits that they don't bother attempting to correct across the network. Far easier to leave it be.
I travel from Clapham Junction to Exeter now and again and whilst I do normally see the guard they don't seem very interested in checking tickets, I think your final paragraph hits the nail on the head.
 
Last edited:

RPI

Established Member
Joined
6 Dec 2010
Messages
2,768
I used to use the then SWT train to Exeter quite often because it was free for me using passes - don't remember ever not seeing a guard on there, they were generally pretty good all over their network.

I think there is quite a lot in weak management letting people get into lazy habits that they don't bother attempting to correct across the network. Far easier to leave it be.
The few keen ones that are left are all old school ones who have been around since SWT days, and its a very small minority.
 

VideozVideoz

Member
Joined
23 Dec 2010
Messages
574
Travelled on my local line (Lichfield - Birmingham) weekly, or several times a week, for the last few years. I’ve had my ticket checked onboard precisely twice in what must be at least 200 journeys. Even the barriers at New Street are open half the time.
I find they new street barriers are usually shut. My QR code wasn’t displaying and they wouldn’t let me through. Consequently, I missed my train despite me showing my email confirmation

I haven't used Preston for a while but when I have ticket checks at the station are common. I would guess that a significant number of people making that journey would be railcard holders, so just forcing anyone alighting without a ticket to buy an Anytime Adult ticket is possibly enough to encourage people to buy before boarding.
I’ve never seen any ticket checks at preston before and I’m there once every couple of weeks!

Any Thameslink service I’ve been on has never had my ticket checked. Does this company not bother??
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top