markymark2000
On Moderation
Key issue on this one is that these rotas are only available once someone has worked somewhere for so long and if they exist, they are rarely advertised so anyone who would want such a duty, reasonably wouldn't apply. Larger operators tend to have a 'new starter' roster and to get off that, you have to wait for spaces to become available on the other rosters which is ok but how long will that take? It's not very gSimilarly some operators offer a choice of rotas (e.g. separate early / late / split shift rotas) for drivers whose circumstances or preferences suit this, and some offer a choice of 'high earnings' rotas with regular longer duties, e.g. a 42 - 45 hour week rather than the normal 38 hour week, for those drivers who want more than standard hours but without working 6 days a week, and / or a rota with 4 long duties not 5 standard duties (although these can present difficulty getting cover in the event of holidays / sickness.)
If you offer staff the hours that they want and work with them, turnover goes down and I think that is what they forget.There can be some resistance from existing staff / unions to new ways of doing things in the face of staff shortages, as any form of flexibility that may attract / retain more staff can conflict with the argument of improving pay and conditions to attract / retain more staff.
The bean counting style of management tends only to see the headline figures, but having a very high turnover of staff will generate costs in recruiting, training and kitting out new drivers. And while everyone's new to a job at some point, and recognising it's a big generalisation, but experienced drivers who are not worried about their personal finances, and who are not working ludicrous duties / rotas, are going to tend to have fewer expensive accidents and generate less customer service issues that will cost time and money to sort out.
The issue is, the TC doesn't do that often and operators know that. It only seems to happen when it is an operator which the authorities don't like. They explore every other option before fining an operator, especially a large operator, they are bit too pally so unfortunately, while yes it is a threat, it's rarely executed and operators know that.And if a lot of journeys get dropped because of staff shortage, some passengers are going to give up on using the buses, so revenue is lost, and if it's frequent and unplanned, then sooner or later the traffic commissioners can impose financial penalties.
I don't think it would make any difference operationally for the full timers and part timers to be on different rosters. Infact, would probably make it worse. If a part timer wants overtime or wants to go full time, they then can't take that work on unless it's on the 'part time' routes or they get route trained which is additional cost. You need a mix of them on all possible rosters. Preferably ones which go past the depot or to/from the bus station (wherever the sign on/off point is) since you won't want to be paying for them to travel if it can be avoided. On a 5 hours shift if that is what they want, an hour for travel and waiting for a bus is just lost time.If you have a mix of fulltme and reduced hours staff, would it be possible (and operationally simpler) to allocate the fulltimers to one set of routes, and the reduced hours staff to another set of routes? Clearly it may not always be possible - e.g. if the reduced hours staff can only work mornings, but it may be simpler to try to piece together shifts in a discrete set of rotas.
I know one depot which struggles like heck for people to do earlies and so they had to put it in with everything else to get them covered.
A good few years ago, drivers would work the school buses at one firm then if they wanted daytime work, would then go to the other company and essentially cover through the midday. Probably not the best for brand image though that you go elsewhere for school work, it's like one firm can't provide enough work.All I knew was that they demanded you weren't working another job whilst working for them....so what's the point of going part time with them then?
For First or another big operator, the only issue that I can see is if they work for another company who is involved in Passenger Carrying Vehicles (PCV). Why would it matter if someone worked in Lidl for a few hours as well? Unless it comes back to the common belief of bus companies that 'If we need you, you must drop everything in your diary, leave your kid in town, they can take the shopping home, It doesn't matter, as long as you are in work within 5 minutes of us calling you'. The belief of live to work, not work to live.