• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Closed/Under Threat Stations Watchlist

Status
Not open for further replies.

SargeNpton

Established Member
Joined
19 Nov 2018
Messages
1,343
Pilning is in the same situation as Polesworth - no footbridge - so perhaps that should be mentioned.
Is Pilning used for potential evacuations of the Severn Tunnel? That may be the only thing keeping it open.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
13,621
Location
Bristol
Is it weird that the stations in the list above have a skeleton -or no- service, while in Scotland at request stops like Altnabreac and Scotscalder they are installing tech to assist passengers and operations...
Because of the remoteness of the far North of Scotland, the line serves a much greater social purpose than other stations in more heavily populated areas where non-driving alternatives like lifts or taxis are more viable. The line, despite it's sparse service, will not be closed unless there is a monumental shift in Scottish politics.
In this context, the investment in tech that help both the passenger flag down a request stop and the railway operate the stops more efficiently is a sensible investment. It's different to stations like Denton, where the trains can't sensibly serve the transport demand and the trams and buses offer decent alternatives into central Manchester.
 

Sealink

Member
Joined
16 Aug 2006
Messages
165
Because of the remoteness of the far North of Scotland, the line serves a much greater social purpose than other stations in more heavily populated areas where non-driving alternatives like lifts or taxis are more viable. The line, despite it's sparse service, will not be closed unless there is a monumental shift in Scottish politics.
In this context, the investment in tech that help both the passenger flag down a request stop and the railway operate the stops more efficiently is a sensible investment. It's different to stations like Denton, where the trains can't sensibly serve the transport demand and the trams and buses offer decent alternatives into central Manchester.

I agree, mostly :)

But then stations like Brigg could surely support a better service? I fear I may be going down a rabbit hole, and it's not to take away from your excellent points.
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
13,621
Location
Bristol
I agree, mostly :)

But then stations like Brigg could surely support a better service? I fear I may be going down a rabbit hole, and it's not to take away from your excellent points.
Brigg could almost certainly support a better service. I don't live in the area so don't know it well but I think this is a frustrating case of railway expediency trumping passenger need. Gainsborough, Kirton Lindsey and Brigg are not big towns but they are not sleepy villages either, and a regular 1tph service (or at least a weekday peak-time) from Grimsby to Gainsborough Central or even Retford would seem to be sensible there.

However I don't know what the actual travel patterns are around there (e.g. if Lincoln or Scunthorpe are more prominent destinations then the train won't compete well against the bus).
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
13,621
Location
Bristol
Have I missed something or why is Gainsborough C more at risk than the other stations on that line?
I'd say all 3 stations on the line are at equal risk. Either the line stays as one or it goes as one. The saving would be in getting rid of the junctions simplifying the operating pattern.
 

Mcr Warrior

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Jan 2009
Messages
12,305
Have I missed something or why is Gainsborough C more at risk than the other stations on that line?
Not sure it's necessarily more at risk, but it seemingly was omitted from the OP's original list in post #1, whereas Kirton Lindsey and Brigg were included.
 

Sealink

Member
Joined
16 Aug 2006
Messages
165
Gainsborough Central does have an hourly service to Sheffield via Retford.
 

Old Yard Dog

Established Member
Joined
21 Aug 2011
Messages
1,489
And it is in the town centre unlike Lea Road which is inconveniently situated a mile or so out of town with only an hourly daytime-only bus service.
 

Mcr Warrior

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Jan 2009
Messages
12,305
Gainsborough Central does have an hourly service to Sheffield via Retford.

Didn't this get cut after COVID? Or has it been restored
Can only see the four Gainsborough Central -> Sheffield services today.

Seven tomorrow (Saturday) from Gainsborough Central -> Sheffield of which three start rom Cleethorpes but then nothing at all on Sunday.

Not exactly a 'Metro' frequency, but still somewhat better than it has been of recent.
 

willgreen

Member
Joined
11 Jan 2020
Messages
632
Location
Leeds
Can only see the four Gainsborough Central -> Sheffield services today.

Seven tomorrow (Saturday) from Gainsborough Central -> Sheffield of which three start rom Cleethorpes but then nothing at all on Sunday.

Not exactly a 'Metro' frequency, but still somewhat better than it has been of recent.
Ah fair enough, that is better than I expected
 

Hornet

Member
Joined
16 Jul 2013
Messages
724
I'm starting to wonder if it has actually been formally closed :lol:
My research regards Weymouth Quay. (Excuse Caps as it's how I list all My Station History Reserch Data on my Excel Spreadsheet).

"WEYMOUTH QUAY STATION CLOSURE HISTORY.
26th SEPTEMBER 1987 WAS THE DATE OF THE LAST REGULAR SCHEDULED PASSENGER SERVICE.
THE LAST TRAIN WAS A 'ONE OFF' CHARTER SERVICE WHICH RAN ON THE 2nd MAY 1999.
NETWORK RAIL DESIGNATED THE WEYMOUTH QUAY TRAMWAY AS "OUT OF USE (TEMPORARY)" FOR A
PERIOD OF 2 YEARS AS FROM 15th JANUARY 2007.
FROM 18th FEBRUARY 2007 TO THE 17th FEBRUARY 2009 NETWORK RAIL HAVE IMPOSED A SHORT-TERM
NETWORK CHANGE TO THE WEYMOUTH QUAY TRAMWAY. THE STRETCH OF TRAMWAY TO BE CLOSED TEMPORARILY
FOR THE 2 YEAR PERIOD IS FROM MELCOMBE REGIS LEVEL CROSSING TO WEYMOUTH QUAY STATION .
A FURTHER 2 YEAR "OUT OF USE (TEMPORARY)" PERIOD STARTED FROM THE 1st APRIL 2009.
NETWORK RAIL PROPOSED THE CLOSURE OF WEYMOUTH QUAY TRAMWAY IN 2013.
THE WEYMOUTH AND PORTLAND BOROUGH COUNCIL’S MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE AGREED A RECOMMENDATION TO SUPPORT, IN PRINCIPLE,
NETWORK RAIL IN PUTTING THE DISUSED WEYMOUTH QUAY TRAMWAY PERMANENTLY OUT OF USE, ALLOWING NETWORK RAIL
TO PROCEED WITH THE PROCESS OF PUTTING THE DISUSED WEYMOUTH QUAY TRAMWAY PERMANENTLY OUT OF USE.
ON THE 2nd FEBRUARY 2016, DORSET COUNCIL MET AND AGREED ON A RECOMMENDATION TO SUPPORT PUTTING THE DISUSED
WEYMOUTH QUAY TRAMWAY PERMANENTLY OUT OF USE AND INFORMED NETWORK RAIL OF THAT.
NETWORK RAIL HAS INDICATED IT'S INTENTION TO START THE PROCESS OF PROGRESSING TO PERMANENTLY OUT OF USE STATUS
FROM THE DATE OF THIS COMMITTEE.
NETWORK RAIL ISSUED A PERMANENT ‘OUT OF USE’ NOTICE 12th APRIL 2016.
WEYMOUTH QUAY TRAMWAY AND STATION WAS NEVER OFFICIALLY CLOSED, BUT PERMISSION WAS GRANTED TO AVOID IT.
(SEE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION E-MAILS). DUE TO THE FACT THAT
NETWORK RAIL TRANSFERRED OWNERSHIP TO DORSET COUNTY COUNCIL AND THAT THE QUAY LINE HAD NOT BEEN USED FOR MANY YEARS.
A CLOSURE NOTICE WAS NOT REQUIRED UNDER THE RULES OF THE 2005 RAILWAY ACT."

As I say my research.
 

Attachments

  • Done Weymouth Quay FOI 1.pdf
    22.5 KB · Views: 28
  • Done Weymouth Quay FOI 2.pdf
    14.4 KB · Views: 8
  • Done Weymouth Quay FOI 3.pdf
    18 KB · Views: 9
  • Done Weymouth Quay FOI 4.pdf
    120.6 KB · Views: 7
  • Done Weymouth Quay FOI 5.pdf
    19.8 KB · Views: 9
  • Done Weymouth Quay FOI 6.pdf
    69.7 KB · Views: 16

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
13,621
Location
Bristol
Cracking piece of research. So it can be taken that 'formal' closure of the tramway and therefore Weymouth Quay took place with the network change to Permanently Out of Use in 2016. This lines up with NESA, which shows a small stub of the quay branch still remains but marked 'Permanently Out of Use', and does not say it continues to any other network or terminal.
 

Baxenden Bank

Established Member
Joined
23 Oct 2013
Messages
4,050
My research regards Weymouth Quay. (Excuse Caps as it's how I list all My Station History Reserch Data on my Excel Spreadsheet).

"WEYMOUTH QUAY STATION CLOSURE HISTORY.
26th SEPTEMBER 1987 WAS THE DATE OF THE LAST REGULAR SCHEDULED PASSENGER SERVICE.
THE LAST TRAIN WAS A 'ONE OFF' CHARTER SERVICE WHICH RAN ON THE 2nd MAY 1999.
NETWORK RAIL DESIGNATED THE WEYMOUTH QUAY TRAMWAY AS "OUT OF USE (TEMPORARY)" FOR A
PERIOD OF 2 YEARS AS FROM 15th JANUARY 2007.
FROM 18th FEBRUARY 2007 TO THE 17th FEBRUARY 2009 NETWORK RAIL HAVE IMPOSED A SHORT-TERM
NETWORK CHANGE TO THE WEYMOUTH QUAY TRAMWAY. THE STRETCH OF TRAMWAY TO BE CLOSED TEMPORARILY
FOR THE 2 YEAR PERIOD IS FROM MELCOMBE REGIS LEVEL CROSSING TO WEYMOUTH QUAY STATION .
A FURTHER 2 YEAR "OUT OF USE (TEMPORARY)" PERIOD STARTED FROM THE 1st APRIL 2009.
NETWORK RAIL PROPOSED THE CLOSURE OF WEYMOUTH QUAY TRAMWAY IN 2013.
THE WEYMOUTH AND PORTLAND BOROUGH COUNCIL’S MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE AGREED A RECOMMENDATION TO SUPPORT, IN PRINCIPLE,
NETWORK RAIL IN PUTTING THE DISUSED WEYMOUTH QUAY TRAMWAY PERMANENTLY OUT OF USE, ALLOWING NETWORK RAIL
TO PROCEED WITH THE PROCESS OF PUTTING THE DISUSED WEYMOUTH QUAY TRAMWAY PERMANENTLY OUT OF USE.
ON THE 2nd FEBRUARY 2016, DORSET COUNCIL MET AND AGREED ON A RECOMMENDATION TO SUPPORT PUTTING THE DISUSED
WEYMOUTH QUAY TRAMWAY PERMANENTLY OUT OF USE AND INFORMED NETWORK RAIL OF THAT.
NETWORK RAIL HAS INDICATED IT'S INTENTION TO START THE PROCESS OF PROGRESSING TO PERMANENTLY OUT OF USE STATUS
FROM THE DATE OF THIS COMMITTEE.
NETWORK RAIL ISSUED A PERMANENT ‘OUT OF USE’ NOTICE 12th APRIL 2016.
WEYMOUTH QUAY TRAMWAY AND STATION WAS NEVER OFFICIALLY CLOSED, BUT PERMISSION WAS GRANTED TO AVOID IT.
(SEE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION E-MAILS). DUE TO THE FACT THAT
NETWORK RAIL TRANSFERRED OWNERSHIP TO DORSET COUNTY COUNCIL AND THAT THE QUAY LINE HAD NOT BEEN USED FOR MANY YEARS.
A CLOSURE NOTICE WAS NOT REQUIRED UNDER THE RULES OF THE 2005 RAILWAY ACT."

As I say my research.
Well, I can't afford a lawyer so shall assume that the procedure described in the last line is 'proper'. Thank you.
As an aside I just learnt how to automatically change upper case to lower case in Excel! In a blank cell type '=lower(cell reference)' eg =lower(a1). The cell reference being where the text to be converted is. Job done!
 

LowLevel

Established Member
Joined
26 Oct 2013
Messages
7,673
I don't think Peartree is at threat. It has a number of regular users. They don't all buy tickets to/from Peartree though.
 

Sealink

Member
Joined
16 Aug 2006
Messages
165
My research regards Weymouth Quay. (Excuse Caps as it's how I list all My Station History Reserch Data on my Excel Spreadsheet).

"WEYMOUTH QUAY STATION CLOSURE HISTORY.
26th SEPTEMBER 1987 WAS THE DATE OF THE LAST REGULAR SCHEDULED PASSENGER SERVICE.
THE LAST TRAIN WAS A 'ONE OFF' CHARTER SERVICE WHICH RAN ON THE 2nd MAY 1999.
NETWORK RAIL DESIGNATED THE WEYMOUTH QUAY TRAMWAY AS "OUT OF USE (TEMPORARY)" FOR A
PERIOD OF 2 YEARS AS FROM 15th JANUARY 2007.
FROM 18th FEBRUARY 2007 TO THE 17th FEBRUARY 2009 NETWORK RAIL HAVE IMPOSED A SHORT-TERM
NETWORK CHANGE TO THE WEYMOUTH QUAY TRAMWAY. THE STRETCH OF TRAMWAY TO BE CLOSED TEMPORARILY
FOR THE 2 YEAR PERIOD IS FROM MELCOMBE REGIS LEVEL CROSSING TO WEYMOUTH QUAY STATION .
A FURTHER 2 YEAR "OUT OF USE (TEMPORARY)" PERIOD STARTED FROM THE 1st APRIL 2009.
NETWORK RAIL PROPOSED THE CLOSURE OF WEYMOUTH QUAY TRAMWAY IN 2013.
THE WEYMOUTH AND PORTLAND BOROUGH COUNCIL’S MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE AGREED A RECOMMENDATION TO SUPPORT, IN PRINCIPLE,
NETWORK RAIL IN PUTTING THE DISUSED WEYMOUTH QUAY TRAMWAY PERMANENTLY OUT OF USE, ALLOWING NETWORK RAIL
TO PROCEED WITH THE PROCESS OF PUTTING THE DISUSED WEYMOUTH QUAY TRAMWAY PERMANENTLY OUT OF USE.
ON THE 2nd FEBRUARY 2016, DORSET COUNCIL MET AND AGREED ON A RECOMMENDATION TO SUPPORT PUTTING THE DISUSED
WEYMOUTH QUAY TRAMWAY PERMANENTLY OUT OF USE AND INFORMED NETWORK RAIL OF THAT.
NETWORK RAIL HAS INDICATED IT'S INTENTION TO START THE PROCESS OF PROGRESSING TO PERMANENTLY OUT OF USE STATUS
FROM THE DATE OF THIS COMMITTEE.
NETWORK RAIL ISSUED A PERMANENT ‘OUT OF USE’ NOTICE 12th APRIL 2016.
WEYMOUTH QUAY TRAMWAY AND STATION WAS NEVER OFFICIALLY CLOSED, BUT PERMISSION WAS GRANTED TO AVOID IT.
(SEE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION E-MAILS). DUE TO THE FACT THAT
NETWORK RAIL TRANSFERRED OWNERSHIP TO DORSET COUNTY COUNCIL AND THAT THE QUAY LINE HAD NOT BEEN USED FOR MANY YEARS.
A CLOSURE NOTICE WAS NOT REQUIRED UNDER THE RULES OF THE 2005 RAILWAY ACT."

As I say my research.
I live near Weymouth. They have lifted the rail lines to the quay.

Funnily,the signal from the quay is still there, at permanent red.

Didn't this get cut after COVID? Or has it been restored
I checked Rail Time Trains and it was operating today
 

70014IronDuke

Established Member
Joined
13 Jun 2015
Messages
3,715
Too kind! I am not against E-W. Far from it. I just don't believe that the local service has to be removed to accommodate it. I think both are possible.
Me neither. I agree 100%. Or perhaps I would put it: both should be made possible.
 

flitwickbeds

Member
Joined
19 Apr 2017
Messages
529
Added Brandon to the master list in post #1 - one platform closed due to old station building at risk of collapse.
 

philthetube

Established Member
Joined
5 Jan 2016
Messages
3,772
Don't think Berney arms is at risk, costs nothing to serve and actually has quite decent (actual) passenger numbers. It is probably in a similar situation to Peartree, mentioned above). Many walkers who continue to Norwich or Acle, I suspect that if that one was ever proposed walking and nature groups would have a lot to say and would probably do passenger surveys to check official numbers.
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
13,621
Location
Bristol
Don't think Berney arms is at risk, costs nothing to serve and actually has quite decent (actual) passenger numbers. It is probably in a similar situation to Peartree, mentioned above). Many walkers who continue to Norwich or Acle, I suspect that if that one was ever proposed walking and nature groups would have a lot to say and would probably do passenger surveys to check official numbers.
Berney Arms wouldn't close unless the Reedham-Yarmouth link was also closed. Politically, I can't see that happening.
 

GRALISTAIR

Established Member
Joined
11 Apr 2012
Messages
7,972
Location
Dalton GA USA & Preston Lancs
What industry closed at Salwick? The Nuclear facility is still open !!
Correct. The freight spur was removed when the line was electrified but the nuclear facility is still open. However, I have a lifelong friend on Fylde Borough Council and he tells me this station will probably close if/when Cottam station gets built/open.
 

Elecman

Established Member
Joined
31 Dec 2013
Messages
2,921
Location
Lancashire
Correct. The freight spur was removed when the line was electrified but the nuclear facility is still open. However, I have a lifelong friend on Fylde Borough Council and he tells me this station will probably close if/when Cottam station gets built/open.
That is very likely
 

WibbleWobble

Member
Joined
19 Aug 2022
Messages
268
Location
Down south
Funnily,the signal from the quay is still there, at permanent red.
Here is the photographic evidence to prove it - taken by myself yesterday (after finally managing to get there!).

Weirdly, the disused track has been left in two small sections - one crossing the access road to the retail park, roughly where I was stood, and also a short section on the dead-end stump of Commercial Road immediately north of the bus depot.

The stretch in between (at the side of B&Q) has been turned into a shared footpath / cycleway, although one of the rails has been set into the asphalt.
 

Attachments

  • 20230325_122833.jpg
    20230325_122833.jpg
    3.3 MB · Views: 171

norbitonflyer

Established Member
Joined
24 Mar 2020
Messages
2,599
Location
SW London
Polesworth is noted as one way only because of a lack of bridge, but Pilning, listed immediately above it, is not so noted although I understand it is in the same situation.
 

Llandudno

Established Member
Joined
25 Dec 2014
Messages
2,260
Should TfW stations between Upton and Wrexham Central (excluding Shotton and Wrexham General) be added to the list as TfW seem hell bent on downgrading the Borderlands line with no sign of train services being resumed anytime soon…
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top