Whistler40145
Established Member
Will England enforce any changes for the final test match?
It won't really matter "Ashes-wise" as that will be the 5th and final Test Match in this series.Will England enforce any changes for the final test match?
Indeed and probably the final appearance of James AndersonIt won't really matter "Ashes-wise" as that will be the 5th and final Test Match in this series.
England will want to square the series so it won’t be a ‘dead’ Test. Josh Tongue back for either Anderson or Broad is all I envision.Will England enforce any changes for the final test match?
Play abandoned 20 minutes ago, without a ball being bowled during the day!
No, not necessarily. Wood and Woakes were automatic choices after Headingley if fit and Robinson needed replacing. Broad would have been justifiably complaining if he'd been relinquished, and the myth of Stokes being the fifth seam bowler had to be perpetuated. So it was Anderson or Tongue essentially, and for all sorts of reasons Anderson got the nod. Sentimentality? Yes, a bit of that plus the numerous voices, here and elsewhere, that Anderson had been 'let down' by the pitches provided at Edgbaston and Lord's. There was some truth in the case of Edgbaston, but not Lord's, and his refusal to admit this imo showed he no longer had the required self-criticism necessary of an elite cricketer, so it was no surprise to me that he failed to produce the goods in Manchester, and his long and illustrious test career should end there.With regards to your earlier posting concerning Tongue, would it not have been better if he had been selected for this particular Test Match which England had to win, rather than the fifth Test Match. Whose shoulders should carry the weight of that decision making?
Yes. a DRAW.In certain circumstances, such as in this Test Match where England looked certain victors had it not been for the rain, should the Umpires pronounce a result?
And the last of a remarkable partnership, two very different characters, just like Trueman and Statham. Brian Stetham was my bowling hero growing up, along with Dougie Wright, the last of the England leggies for some while.The match bowling returns of the "old brigade" might be worth noting, as this looks to be the last opportunity to do so for the elder of the two.....
Broad........26 - 2 - 115 - 2
Anderson...37 - 9 - 81 - 1
England will want to square the series so it won’t be a ‘dead’ Test. Josh Tongue back for either Anderson or Broad is all I envision.
An inevitable comparison really.And the last of a remarkable partnership, two very different characters, just like Trueman and Statham. Brian Stetham was my bowling hero growing up, along with Dougie Wright, the last of the England leggies for some while.
There is no Duckworth Lewis for test matches thankfully and whilst I’m sad because Australia retain the ashes, the correct result was a draw.In certain circumstances, such as in this Test Match where England looked certain victors had it not been for the rain, should the Umpires pronounce a result?
That was my forecast as well.Drawing the series is almost as important as winning it. I've predicted 2-2 all along, with one ruined by rain, and I see no reason to revise that now, especially with Australia lacking a capable spinner.
I agree with most of that. I'd add though that, up until yesterday, England had had most of the good fortune going - all four tosses won, and with that and the weather the best fast bowling conditions. Lyon's injury too, much more impactful than Leach's which was pre-series. Something that hasn't much been featured was England's appalling over rate on Saturday afternoon, as though play then was an unexpected extra to add to a guaranteed session or two on Sunday. England might have had six or seven Aussie wickets down if they'd had more gumption. By the way, if there had been some play yesterday I don't think an England victory was by any means certain. Marsh. Green. Carey. Starc and Cummins might well have added enough runs to set, say, 126 in 14 overs, and after 7 of those overs with England 63-5, with Stokes and Bairstow, both raised in the order, out. What might then have happened? We shall never know!I think overall England can hold their heads up. Look at where we were this time about 16 months ago. Rudderless, clueless and a general shambles all round.
Yet we've matched the Aussies in general and can consider ourselves unlucky not to have gone into the last with all to play for.
Poor preparation for the first test, the keeping situation are the two aspects that were avoidable though.
Just like the abandoned day in the "Free George Davis" Test (Headingley - '77(??)! However, that would have been ruined by rain too.I agree with most of that. I'd add though that, up until yesterday, England had had most of the good fortune going - all four tosses won, and with that and the weather the best fast bowling conditions. Lyon's injury too, much more impactful than Leach's which was pre-series. Something that hasn't much been featured was England's appalling over rate on Saturday afternoon, as though play then was an unexpected extra to add to a guaranteed session or two on Sunday. England might have had six or seven Aussie wickets down if they'd had more gumption. By the way, if there had been some play yesterday I don't think an England victory was by any means certain. Marsh. Green. Carey. Starc and Cummins might well have added enough runs to set, say, 126 in 14 overs, and after 7 of those overs with England 63-5, with Stokes and Bairstow, both raised in the order, out. What might then have happened? We shall never know!
It would, but they've picked Bairstow again.Shame that it ended on such a damp note, would have made for such a dramatic & enthralling final test. The best thing now would be to end the series as a 2-2 draw.
Nothing wrong with his selection...unfortunately, they've also picked Broad.It would, but they've picked Bairstow again.
Still the top wicket taker in the series..................................Nothing wrong with his selection...unfortunately, they've also picked Broad.
and you cant see from the last game why they are picking him?It would, but they've picked Bairstow again.
Actually, it's more the English media, well certain publications that is, that had the tantrum...not the team or indeed those of us who are pragmatic about the result and love cricket.So... has English cricket finished thier tantrum?
Or should the colony send thier finest tissues?
Actually, it's more the English media, well certain publications that is, that had the tantrum...not the team or indeed those of us who are pragmatic about the result and love cricket.
I sat opposite Glenn McGrath on the train into Euston yesterday. What a nice man. He is also MASSIVLEY tall.
That was a moment!Hoped you asked how us ankle is, and left a tennis ball under the seat.