• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Do you think that the UK switching to electric vehicles is realistic?

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
103,798
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
My current car was new in 2020 and came fitted with Bridgestone Potenzas. At four years old three were suffering from tread cuts and sidewall perishing and cracking, and since my car doesn't have a spare wheel, I opted to change them. To my surprise, when I looked up replacement tyre availability, the Potenzas were listed as "suitable for summer use only" in Britain - I hadn't been warned of that by the dealer supplying the car. They've now been changed for Goodyear all-season tyres, since I don't have space or facilities to keep separate summer and winter sets (in common with about 99% of UK car owners I suspect).

Almost nobody has winter tyres in the UK. 99% of cars have summer tyres. They're just not necessary because there is about a week a year when road conditions and temperatures are such that they might be helpful.

All-season tyres are likely to be a compromise at both - they'll wear faster than summer tyres. (The difference is how hard the rubber is)
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
29,386
Location
UK
Almost nobody has winter tyres in the UK. 99% of cars have summer tyres. They're just not necessary because there is about a week a year when road conditions and temperatures are such that they might be helpful.

All-season tyres are likely to be a compromise at both - they'll wear faster than summer tyres. (The difference is how hard the rubber is)

I fitted winter tyres when driving a fair bit and as they're better when temperatures at about 7 degrees or less, they're useful for far more than a week.

The difference in grip, especially in snow, is amazing and the main issue here is that you can drive in terrible conditions but most cars around you can't so you still get stuck behind them.

I wholeheartedly recommend them if you want to feel safer and be able to drive almost normally.

My local garage kept my tyres in store and swapped them for me so it was no fuss. Minimal cost and keeping two sets of rubber meant an extended lifespan for each.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
31,961
Back to EVs… two small landmarks this week.

1) SMMT data for February registrations had 25% of all newly registered cars being EVs, with a further 9% being plug in hybrids.

2) My standard measure of EV use is to count the number I see with a driver behind the wheel on my walk to the station in the morning. In 2019 I was excited if I saw more than 3, last year the record went up to 20. I have been waiting to breakthrough the 30 barrier for a while, with a couple of 28s and a 29, but today smashed through it with 37.
 

paul1609

Established Member
Joined
28 Jan 2006
Messages
7,992
Location
K
Back to EVs… two small landmarks this week.

1) SMMT data for February registrations had 25% of all newly registered cars being EVs, with a further 9% being plug in hybrids.

2) My standard measure of EV use is to count the number I see with a driver behind the wheel on my walk to the station in the morning. In 2019 I was excited if I saw more than 3, last year the record went up to 20. I have been waiting to breakthrough the 30 barrier for a while, with a couple of 28s and a 29, but today smashed through it with 37.
Id suggest its very patchy, down here in deepest Kent they are still very rare. If you see them itll be DFLs at the weekend visiting family or their second homes.
We do however have our first fast charger on the A259 outside of Rye in a farm shop. Its unusual to see more than 1 bay in use in Station Road Tenterden car park.
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
29,386
Location
UK
When my then MP Grant Shapps announced the green strip on EV plates I thought it was dumb, but now it certainly does help highlight how many there are on the road.

And like others, in any given trip I will see many EVs out and about.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
31,961
I can cheat a bit on that tally. Our local railway station is about 200 yards from our front door. Between, is a Volvo dealership, with an abundance of EVs. :D

Ah, but I only count those with a driver behind the wheel. Otherwise when I walk past the various car parks….


When my then MP Grant Shapps announced the green strip on EV plates I thought it was dumb, but now it certainly does help highlight how many there are on the road.

It does, although I have seen green flash plates on cars that definitely have an engine; conversely about a quarter of the EVs I see don’t have the green flash.
 

GusB

Established Member
Joined
9 Jul 2016
Messages
7,356
Location
Elginshire
It is getting quite common to various degrees.
First problem is there is no clue the bus is about to move (no juddering into gear or change in engine note).
Do you need a clue that a bus is about to move? Surely if it stops and picks people up it's expected that the bus will move off once the last passenger has boarded.

Second it is instant full on acceleration if the driver so wishes - lethal.
Really depends on whether the driver is the on-off type or if they try to be gentle on acceleration and braking.
I am sure it must be possible to limit the acceleration on an electric bus ?.
I wish that you'd stop blaming this incident on the fact that the bus was electric; it was simply poor driving. It's highly likely that if the driver was the on/off type, they'd do the same whatever means of propulsion. It's possible to knock someone off their feet when a diesel vehicle accelerates or brakes harshly.
 

Peter Sarf

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
7,533
Location
Croydon
Do you need a clue that a bus is about to move? Surely if it stops and picks people up it's expected that the bus will move off once the last passenger has boarded.
Well we all know buses move - obviously. BUT should a driver wait for people to sit down or at least clear the stairs - the available seats are not always right next to the door. I was on the stairs - how else does one get to the upper deck ?. How else do you propose one uses a bus if one has to assume it will move at any instant after boarding and therefore no liability rests with the bus operator to check where people are ?.
I wish that you'd stop blaming this incident on the fact that the bus was electric; it was simply poor driving. It's highly likely that if the driver was the on/off type, they'd do the same whatever means of propulsion. It's possible to knock someone off their feet when a diesel vehicle accelerates or brakes harshly.
I can assure you that the acceleration of an electric bus is a lot greater than the acceleration of a diesel bus.
I do not have figures but I have regular experience.
What makes it worse is the lack of a clue the bus is about to lurch forwards.
You do get a clue with a diesel and the acceleration is less anyway.

Therefore I maintain there is an issue - the bus operator needs to be aware that the electric bus can accelerate faster and so more likely to cause injury.
I am not saying electric busses should be banned or withdrawn but it is a good idea to understand the new risk associated with them and mitigate accordingly.
 

NIT100

Member
Joined
10 Aug 2022
Messages
156
Location
Glasgow
Well we all know buses move - obviously. BUT should a driver wait for people to sit down or at least clear the stairs - the available seats are not always right next to the door. I was on the stairs - how else does one get to the upper deck ?. How else do you propose one uses a bus if one has to assume it will move at any instant after boarding and therefore no liability rests with the bus operator to check where people are ?.

I can assure you that the acceleration of an electric bus is a lot greater than the acceleration of a diesel bus.
I do not have figures but I have regular experience.
What makes it worse is the lack of a clue the bus is about to lurch forwards.
You do get a clue with a diesel and the acceleration is less anyway.

Therefore I maintain there is an issue - the bus operator needs to be aware that the electric bus can accelerate faster and so more likely to cause injury.
I am not saying electric busses should be banned or withdrawn but it is a good idea to understand the new risk associated with them and mitigate accordingly.
Which is already implement with TFL. Most new buses will have the ability to limit acceleration, and some can also limit jerk (rate of change of acceleration). But generally it is up to the operator to either specify what they want on purchase, or manage it themselves.

Extract from Bus Vehicle Specification_v2.5 April 2024 on page 20

4.3 Driver Assist
4.3.1 Acceleration performance The combined engine and transmission acceleration controls shall limit the bus to a rate that provides the driver with adequate driving acceleration in the fully laden condition, whilst not subjecting the passengers to excessive forces that potentially cause the passengers to become unstable.
4.3.1.1 Acceleration Rate Compliance The maximum rate of acceleration shall be less than 1.2m/s2 under all load conditions when tested against LBSL Attachment 43: Bus Acceleration Performance Assessment Protocol.
4.3.2 Advanced Emergency Braking (AEB) This requirement only applies to new vehicles entering the fleet from 2024 as per the Bus Safety Roadmap for new build buses It should be noted that AEB is intended to operate only in the last second or two before an imminent collision. The driver remains responsible for all aspects of driving, including collision avoidance, at all times.
 

MotCO

Established Member
Joined
25 Aug 2014
Messages
5,093
Is the situation worse with the advent of straight staircases? I'm sure staircases used to have shorter straight sections, so it would be easier to balance against the corners under sharp acceleration, of indeed braking.
 

Peter Sarf

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
7,533
Location
Croydon
Which is already implement with TFL. Most new buses will have the ability to limit acceleration, and some can also limit jerk (rate of change of acceleration). But generally it is up to the operator to either specify what they want on purchase, or manage it themselves.

Extract from Bus Vehicle Specification_v2.5 April 2024 on page 20
Interesting. So perhaps things have changed since my accident on 30/01/2024.
I really should find a way of chasing it up for the safety of others.

July 20 page 13 "Lower maximum acceleration limit removed".

As per page 20. Maximum 1.2m/s**2.
Acceleration due to gravity is 9.8m/s**2 so the 1.2m/s**2 standard is quite respectable ?. Or am I getting my 50 year old maths/physics wrong ?. My left hand was losing grip on the handrail. Granted my hand was sliding down but I suspect I was experiencing way more than 1.2m/s**2. Of course gravity is in there acting at about 45 degrees.
Is the situation worse with the advent of straight staircases? I'm sure staircases used to have shorter straight sections, so it would be easier to balance against the corners under sharp acceleration, of indeed braking.
I suppose staircases always used to be across the back of the bus going back far enough in time. So acceleration/braking would just throw someone against the side wall rather than straight down.

I am not aware of newer buses having a landing or bend half way. The "Boris" bus has the rear staircase running across the back the forward staircase is standard iirc. In modern buildings staircases have to (legally ?) have bends or landings.

I think it is more to do with the possible acceleration of newer electric buses than change in staircases. Although really some would argue a staircase in a moving vehicle is a crazy idea in the first place - oops bang goes half the bus capacity !.
 
Last edited:

NIT100

Member
Joined
10 Aug 2022
Messages
156
Location
Glasgow
In modern buildings staircases have to (legally ?) have bends or landings.
Part M building regs (Accessibility) has a limit of 12 steps between landings, for rest and recovery. There is specified dimensions for landing sizes etc. but I am an engineer not an architect so don't get involved too much in these things.
 

MotCO

Established Member
Joined
25 Aug 2014
Messages
5,093
Interesting. So perhaps things have changed since my accident on 30/01/2024.
I really should find a way of chasing it up for the safety of others.

July 20 page 13 "Lower maximum acceleration limit removed".

As per page 20. Maximum 1.2m/s**2.
Acceleration due to gravity is 9.8m/s**2 so the 1.2m/s**2 standard is quite respectable ?. Or am I getting my 50 year old maths/physics wrong ?. My left hand was losing grip on the handrail. Granted my hand was sliding down but I suspect I was experiencing way more than 1.2m/s**2. Of course gravity is in there acting at about 45 degrees.

I suppose staircases always used to be across the back of the bus going back far enough in time. So acceleration/braking would just throw someone against the side wall rather than straight down.

I am not aware of newer buses having a landing or bend half way. The "Boris" bus has the rear staircase running across the back the forward staircase is standard iirc. In modern buildings staircases have to (legally ?) have bends or landings.

I think it is more to do with the possible acceleration of newer electric buses than change in staircases. Although really some would argue a staircase in a moving vehicle is a crazy idea in the first place - oops bang goes half the bus capacity !.

I'm thinking that early DMSs seem to have had a shorter straight section, and more steps at the top and bottom going across the bus, but post 'Ogle', the later DMSs, Metrobuses and Titans had longer straights. Or maybe I am just mis-remembering.
 

notverydeep

Member
Joined
9 Feb 2014
Messages
1,046
One of my main memories of a year driving buses in London in 1994 and 1995. was that there was often very little margin between no braking at all and fully letting go of the anchor and that giving a comfortable ride was difficult at best and likely to loose quite a lot of time. A couple of true emergency stops illustrated that bus brakes can be really, really effective! Acceleration was usually a bit smoother, but even here it was quite hard to give a smooth ride and to predict exactly when gear changes would occur. Even in a fleet of only about 25 double-deckers there was a great deal of inconsistency. It sounds like the 30 years since have not really changed that...
 

Peter Sarf

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
7,533
Location
Croydon
I'm thinking that early DMSs seem to have had a shorter straight section, and more steps at the top and bottom going across the bus, but post 'Ogle', the later DMSs, Metrobuses and Titans had longer straights. Or maybe I am just mis-remembering.
Yes. I cannot recall what the stairs looked like on older busses except my school bus days back in 1965-1969 when it was something akin to a route master but outside London. I do not remember ever going upstairs but in those days of course the air up there was very unpleasant, chokeingly so !. - only suitable for those wanting to kill themselves with tobacco !.
One of my main memories of a year driving buses in London in 1994 and 1995. was that there was often very little margin between no braking at all and fully letting go of the anchor and that giving a comfortable ride was difficult at best and likely to loose quite a lot of time. A couple of true emergency stops illustrated that bus brakes can be really, really effective! Acceleration was usually a bit smoother, but even here it was quite hard to give a smooth ride and to predict exactly when gear changes would occur. Even in a fleet of only about 25 double-deckers there was a great deal of inconsistency. It sounds like the 30 years since have not really changed that...
The acceleration possible with an electric bus is a lot greater. It is significantly more dangerous than the bus at top speed (except if an emergency stop intervenes). It is also when the passenger is most likely to be still moving
It is an important thing to address as otherwise it is going to look bad for electric vehicles. Maybe it can be limited with software ?.

Interestingly I notice some London busses give a very brief toot on their horn as they set off - this seems to be automatic and only on diesel buses ?. I have assumed this is so that pedestrians in really busy parts of congested London get a clue before they are flattened - remembering the engine is right at the opposite end so no clue available. Bear in mind there are plenty of places where buses and pedestrians are very thoroughly mixed. I wonder why this feature does not seems to exist on electric buses ?. Indeed maybe electric cars as well should have it. It is a very brief and weak toot that also gives a clue to people inside the bus. Only down side would be yet more low level noise (vehicles reversing, turning & doors closing) but acceleration can be a sudden and unexpected move otherwise.
 

notverydeep

Member
Joined
9 Feb 2014
Messages
1,046
The acceleration possible with an electric bus is a lot greater. It is significantly more dangerous than the bus at top speed (except if an emergency stop intervenes). It is also when the passenger is most likely to be still moving
It is an important thing to address as otherwise it is going to look bad for electric vehicles. Maybe it can be limited with software ?.
I would say that software management of acceleration and especially the 'jerk rate' is essential. I don't know whether this is already applied to any of the existing electric buses. I would be surprised if the extra acceleration that electric traction would permit would improve passenger journey times to any significant degree, given the low average traffic speeds in urban areas and the small fraction of the journey they would represent on longer interurban or rural routes.

Stairs on double-deckers are a key potential hazard on an otherwise very safe mode (compared to road transport as a whole). When I was driving, I did do my best to ensure that everyone going upstairs was seated before moving off, but this did lead to losing time - I wasn't a very fast bus driver! I wonder if there would be a case for re-visiting articulate vehicles from this perspective, but that is probably for another thread!
 

Peter Sarf

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
7,533
Location
Croydon
I would say that software management of acceleration and especially the 'jerk rate' is essential. I don't know whether this is already applied to any of the existing electric buses. I would be surprised if the extra acceleration that electric traction would permit would improve passenger journey times to any significant degree, given the low average traffic speeds in urban areas and the small fraction of the journey they would represent on longer interurban or rural routes.

Stairs on double-deckers are a key potential hazard on an otherwise very safe mode (compared to road transport as a whole). When I was driving, I did do my best to ensure that everyone going upstairs was seated before moving off, but this did lead to losing time - I wasn't a very fast bus driver! I wonder if there would be a case for re-visiting articulate vehicles from this perspective, but that is probably for another thread!
Good point about negligible impact of subdued acceleration.

I think without software it is up to the kind of driver. Some drivers will try to make up time more aggressively than others. You make me think also its inevitable that a driver might not notice someone on the stairs. It is a lot to check the inside of the bus and manoeuvre a large vehicle in London traffic !. Mistakes happen but its the consequences of some mistakes that have to be worried about - if it can be avoided by limiting acceleration than all to the good.
 

DelW

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2015
Messages
4,687
Interestingly I notice some London busses give a very brief toot on their horn as they set off - this seems to be automatic and only on diesel buses ?. I have assumed this is so that pedestrians in really busy parts of congested London get a clue before they are flattened - remembering the engine is right at the opposite end so no clue available. Bear in mind there are plenty of places where buses and pedestrians are very thoroughly mixed. I wonder why this feature does not seems to exist on electric buses ?. Indeed maybe electric cars as well should have it. It is a very brief and weak toot that also gives a clue to people inside the bus. Only down side would be yet more low level noise (vehicles reversing, turning & doors closing) but acceleration can be a sudden and unexpected move otherwise.
I believe that for several years now, electric and hybrid cars have had to be fitted with an audible warning that sounds when they're moving at low speed. When I bought my hybrid in 2020 it was still an option (which I ticked) - I was a bit concerned that it might be a loud warble or similar, but in fact it's not audible from inside the car. I think they became mandatory a year or so later.
 

BingMan

Member
Joined
8 Feb 2019
Messages
467
When my then MP Grant Shapps announced the green strip on EV plates I thought it was dumb, but now it certainly does help highlight how many there are on the road.

And like others, in any given trip I will see many EVs out and about.
The green strip annoys me. There is no such thing as a "green" motor vehicle just various levels of grey. An electrical spark symbol i would be more appropriate way of indicating an EV

Therefore I maintain there is an issue - the bus operator needs to be aware that the electric bus can accelerate faster and so more likely to cause injury.
I am not saying electric busses should be banned or withdrawn but it is a good idea to understand the new risk associated with them and mitigate accordingly.
Not a new problem. the Bradford trolley buses in the fifties' were notorious for their rapid acceleration.
 

87electric

Member
Joined
27 Jan 2010
Messages
1,154
Plenty of news reports on a car exploding/catching fire in a tunnel near Heathrow at 3am today. Interesting to see that there are quotes from the fire brigade. The quote in the Express online article say it was an EV while Sky online say diesel powered. Someone is misquoting here, but who? Is there any footage of the fire brigade talking to the cameras at all?
 

Harpers Tate

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2013
Messages
1,857
It seems that most of the reports I looked at say "diesel" including the Express just now.
 

bahnause

Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
666
Location
bülach (switzerland)
Plenty of news reports on a car exploding/catching fire in a tunnel near Heathrow at 3am today. Interesting to see that there are quotes from the fire brigade. The quote in the Express online article say it was an EV while Sky online say diesel powered. Someone is misquoting here, but who? Is there any footage of the fire brigade talking to the cameras at all?
A look at the statistics shows that fires are much more likely with combustion engines than with EVs. Unfortunately, people seem to increasingly believe the widespread misinformation about EVs and suspect them first and foremost in the event of a fire.
 

PeterC

Established Member
Joined
29 Sep 2014
Messages
4,364
To the conspiracy theorists all cars that catch fire ae EVs.

Edit; correcting typo
 
Last edited:

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
15,211
Location
St Albans
The green strip annoys me. There is no such thing as a "green" motor vehicle just various levels of grey. An electrical spark symbol i would be more appropriate way of indicating an EV


Not a new problem. the Bradford trolley buses in the fifties' were notorious for their rapid acceleration.
It's not a problem at all, - no need to get annoyed. An electrical spark symbol might need to be stylised to avoid confusion with the registration numbers/letters, - another excuse to raise their number plate price. A simple green strip is just another colour trim for the plate, like a yellow background or red characters.
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
29,386
Location
UK
A look at the statistics shows that fires are much more likely with combustion engines than with EVs. Unfortunately, people seem to increasingly believe the widespread misinformation about EVs and suspect them first and foremost in the event of a fire.

Not only that but because they're getting so much anti EV nonsense posted on Facebook, when anyone says it was a petrol or diesel vehicle the immediate response is that this is a lie, and that it's a cover up.

Even today people insist the fire at Luton Airport was an EV. The fire service, police, airport workers and general public involved are all in on the conspiracy. Just like your GP you've known for years was in on the Covid scam....

it will have been diesel given the short time the fire service were on site.

Can't be (sarcasm) as we've all seen that video that shows diesel doesn't burn because someone put a match in some diesel and it went out...
 

Snow1964

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2019
Messages
8,060
Location
West Wiltshire
DfT says there are now over 75,000 public chargers in UK, with new one every 29 minutes. Also 680,000 domestic driveway chargers.

So chances of not finding one are going down (but there are still some local areas where they are thinly spaced)

Millions will find it easier to drive an electric vehicle (EV) or make the switch as the UK reaches the landmark of 75,000 public chargers.

Backed by £200 million in government investment, today (12 March 2025) Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander has confirmed this significant milestone – with public chargers rolled out at the lightning speed of one every 29 minutes.

The number of public chargers sits alongside over 680,000 domestic chargepoints at people’s driveways, helping ensure EV drivers or those looking to make the switch are never too far from a chargepoint.

This flagship moment comes as the government is investing over £2.3 billion to help industry and consumers make a supported switch to EVs. This is creating high paid jobs, attracting investment and tapping into a multi-billion pound industry to make the UK a clean energy superpower and deliver the Plan for Change.

 
Joined
19 Jul 2023
Messages
172
Location
Milton Keynes
Not sure if this is the appropriate place to ask this - EVs will need to pay VED from 1st April 2025.

Is the DVLA going to contact/write to all registered keepers to tell them they need to go online and pay or is it up to the registered keeper to know that they need to pay in a couple of weeks time and be pro-active and go online and pay?
 

Top