Don’t even think about deliberately only quoting a tiny part of my very lengthy post so as to make it look a different way
Notice how my next sentence was - there’s nothing wrong with that. Literally the start of the next paragraph. The audacity there is really quite something;Yes exactly! It’s a very manipulative tactic.
The quote was nothing wrong with that butDon’t you even think about deliberately only quoting a tiny part of my very lengthy post so as to make it look a different way
Maybe I'm being unfair, but that doesn't sound very much like you genuinely think there's nothing wrong with it?
Quite. It's almost amazing the weird scenarios people make up in their minds to make things fit.
Indeed. And it isn't.
I don’t think there’s anything wrong with it per say, I was simply replying to a user who asked how it was virtue signaling. I explained how it was virtue signalling. And indeed, I think such virtue signalling pointless when it’s done so deliberately obviously. But nowhere did I say there was something wrong with it. The twisting of other people’s posts is unfair, yes, and I really beg that you stop.
Think you may have had a swing an a miss there. Agree with your points but not sure it was NorthKent1989 that made *those* comments.
You have:
Although the other posts I was thinking of were actually from another poster- apologies for that, I'll edit accordingly.
My interpretation of what you wrote was based on the words after the but, in the same way when someone says "with all due respect" it usually precedes something very disrespectful. Again, apologies if this was not what you were saying.
Naming the Overground lines was a manifesto commitment at the last election.
They didn't put any words in their mouth. They asked what bad about that scenario.
Good response telstarbox! One could argue that Elizabeth Line is also political. Victoria too (though at second hand I suppose, since the station was already there). But the Establishment never thinks that support for them is political.Unlike, say, Trafalgar Square or Waterloo?
Unlike, say, Trafalgar Square or Waterloo?
I was thinking the same thing. It does certainly load ammo in that particular argument next time the topic comes around again in the local press and transport initiatives.
Indeed. Few of the Underground lines describe their location. Central perhaps. Northern is downright misleading. District is meaningless, as (except in historical terms) is the Metropolitan.
I think that's kind of intentional, the Liz is basically a fancy 'Overground' (A TfL service on national rail)
It's not even the original Metropolitan Railway, which went to Paddington (later extended to Hammersmith) but the "St Johns Wood branch"
The women's team, not the girls (under 18s)
To be fair many fans and media refer to the men's team as "our boys".
dnco.com
There is no Emerson Park though, its Hornchurch!
