Search results

Lots of emotive language being used here. Given that none of us are privy to the investigation and what evidence there is (or isn't), I am not sure how anyone on here can categorically state this was "murder".

Whats vague about it? It clearly states the areas of disruption and the reason why. Don't see why the 2016 incident should factor into it.

So unless you have had a perfect nights sleep you should call in sick? In any case, shift work, especially when it involves very early starts can mess you up regardless of how much sleep you might have had.

Speaking for heavy rail, that is the general idea. But if there is still pressure or weight being applied after the driver blacks out you will have to wait untill the driver vigilance device kicks in which could be up to a minute.

Perhaps more people visit other parts of the forum than they do here.

Yes. Anyone that intentionally interferes with the safe and or punctual operation of railway services should be fined.

He's not nit picking, he's stating the facts. Also, Given it sounds like a glancing blow, how do you know the driver knew he hit the passenger and how do you know he only reported it 40 minutes later?

Sorry I may have jumped the gun. Are we talking short haul or long haul?

Sorry but how in the hell is it rude to recline you seat?? What you are doing to prevent it is totally out of order!:roll: I pay my fare, and I'm within my rights to use it... and I will, particularly if I have upgraded.

Thankfully only the latter did :)

The thing is, do they actually need the publics sympathy?

Striking as a whole is not unreasonable. What will reducing benefits to the rest of the staff achieve? As far as I can see that will just shift the issue to the other side of the employees and there will be alot more will power for strike action for perk/benefit loses than there would be for...

RMT press release

Wasn't the hump designed with cargo carriers in mind?

Do you get a discount on the current First Group busses then?