• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

11 May, Fatal Taichung MRT crash, automatic train hit failed crane 1 dead 10 injured

Status
Not open for further replies.

Gostav

Member
Joined
14 May 2016
Messages
415
English news from Focus Taiwan https://focustaiwan.tw/society/202305110019
41 seconds from track intrusion to fatal Taichung MRT crash, video shows
Taichung, May 11 (CNA) The Taichung Metro faced growing scrutiny over its emergency response procedures after releasing video footage showing that 41 seconds passed from the time a crane boom fell onto the MRT line and when it was struck by a train on Wednesday, killing one passenger and injuring 10.

Taichung Metro released the footage and laid out its version of how the accident unfolded in a press conference Thursday morning at Feng-le Park Station, near where the crash occurred.

In the video footage, the train enters Feng-le Park Station at 12:26:50 p.m. The crane boom -- which collapsed as it was being removed from the 31st floor of a nearby building under construction -- is seen falling in front of the station at 12:27:04 p.m., striking noise barriers surrounding the MRT line, but not falling directly onto the tracks.

Despite the intrusion, the train proceeded to leave the station at 12:27:30 p.m. and crashed into the boom at 12:27:45, pushing it for several more seconds before coming to a stop.


Regarding the video, Taichung Metro Chief of Operations Hsu Tai-ming (許泰銘) explained that all Taichung MRT trains have a two-meter long sensor on the front car, which activates the emergency brakes if it comes into contact with a foreign object on the tracks.

However, the MRT network does not have an intrusion detection system surrounding the tracks, which means that if a foreign object does not land on top of the tracks or disturb any electrical equipment, it will not trigger an emergency notification, Hsu said.

In terms of the response by MRT staff, Hsu said the security guard on the platform immediately notified the station manager by radio after discovering that something had fallen in front of the train.

According to Hsu, the station manager -- who can not be seen in the released footage -- went to the platform to check, and then ran to the station's service desk to alert the traffic control center.

From the traffic control center, activating the emergency brakes via computer and getting the train to stop takes about 20 seconds, which would have still been insufficient to prevent the accident, he said.

Meanwhile, Hsu said the MRT attendant inside the driverless, automated train also followed relevant SOP by notifying the traffic control center over the radio after discovering the object in the train's path.

The attendant then reached for the key to open the driver panel and access the emergency brakes, Hsu said, but the train rammed into the metal frame moments later.

A CCTV image released by on Thursday by Taichung Mass Transit Transport Corp. shows reactions of the staff and passengers on the platform before the crash a day earlier.
In addition to the response of staff members, the Taichung Metro also faced questions over the apparent inability of people on the platform or inside the first carriage to quickly bring the train to a halt.

On the New Taipei Metro, for example, there are emergency brake levers on the wall of each train carriage, which can stop a train approximately eight seconds after being activated.

Meanwhile, the Taipei Metro has emergency brakes on the platforms at some high-traffic stations, which can be used in case a person or object falls onto the tracks.

The Taichung Metro lacks both of these features.

Although Taichung Metro carriages do have emergency buttons, the company explained that once activated, these only stop the train after it reaches the next station.

Similarly, it said, the emergency door release handle does not work when the train is moving.

Regarding these issues, Taichung Metro's acting chairman, Lin Liang-tai (林良泰), said only that the company will "evaluate installing emergency buttons on station platforms" and "continue to improve" its emergency hardware and evacuation procedures.

Meanwhile, the Taichung District Prosecutors Office said Thursday it summoned 10 people from the company operating the crane, as well as a Taichung MRT security guard and train attendant for questioning.

Four individuals from the construction firm, including the site manager and crane operator, were interrogated on suspicion of negligent homicide and offenses against public safety, and were later released on bail ranging from NT$200,000 (US$6,506) to NT$500,000, the office said.

(By Su Mu-chun, Hau Hsueh-ching and Matthew Mazzetta)

Enditem/AW
Cannot believe that "though Taichung Metro carriages do have emergency buttons...these only stop the train after it reaches the next station." "...the emergency door release handle does not work when the train is moving."

Video report

Wiki shows the rolling stock of Taichung Metro were made by Kawashi (include the automatic operation system?). Emm, not good.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
24,947
Location
Nottingham
Cannot believe that "though Taichung Metro carriages do have emergency buttons...these only stop the train after it reaches the next station." "...the emergency door release handle does not work when the train is moving."
Balance of risk. Incidents of this type are far less likely (indeed I can't recall anything similar) than incidents where the safest course of action is to bring the train to the next station where it can be evacuated quickly and safely, and the majority of metros whether automated or manually driven will adopt this approach. However, there might be a case for giving the station manager and the on-train attendant the facility to stop a train quickly via an emergency button, as these staff can be trained to assess an incident and work out the best course of action.
 

MarkyT

Established Member
Joined
20 May 2012
Messages
6,271
Location
Torbay
I think it's fairly common for passenger alarm buttons in metro systems to not automatically stop trains between stations whether the train is manually or automatically driven. That makes particular sense underground where help for most envisaged incidents onboard (health, crime, fire) can be more effectively provided at the next station rather than stuck in a running tunnel between stops. In tunnels, a substantial external object falling suddenly on the track is less likely than on this elevated section however.

It seems two employees were aware of the obstacle, possibly immediately, but weren't able to quickly initiate an emergency stop. An onboard train attendant was at or near the front of the train although it's not explained whether they were sat at the forward 'driving' position, or whether they're alway required to be there. Nevertheless they had to unlock and open a panel to access the emergency stop button and first reportedly radioed in to the control centre, adding to delay. The platform security guard, similarly, had no direct immediate access to an emergency stop facility and had to radio in to the control centre.

Lessons to be learnt for the railway no doubt, but the main takeaway for me is that construction work near the railway is hazardous, so maybe extra temporary measures to protect the track need to be implemented when risky activities like the crane dismantling are being carried out. A physical crash deck would be gold standard, or additional communications and alarms perhaps suspending operations briefly during critical lifting events.

The comment about emergency door release was bizzare. Of course doors should never be able to be opened in motion!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top