I would agree with this statement if we were solely talking about the passenger railway. Sadly since 1982 freight traffic continues to contract, although in saying that it is more to do with the traditional rail using industries dissapearing.
It's mentioned on the first post under events that happened in 2002.Anyone mentioned the re-opening of Beauly as a modest (one coach length station ?) ..........any traffic on that line is / was worthwhile............
It's mentioned on the first post under events that happened in 2002.
Yes, definitely....but probably best not to mention Altnabreac!Is it worth mentioning the new kiosks on Far North Line at Scotscalder etc. where boarding passengers now alert the driver electronically, potentially speeding up services?
I notice the list of improvements since 2000 doesn't include the routes to England via the WCML/ECML.
These may not be Scotrail projects but they certainly involve Network Rail Scotland north of Carlisle/Berwick, and substantial investment.
Including:
- tilting trains on the WCML, with increased London frequencies (hourly to Glasgow in the 2008 VHF timetable
- improved speeds/frequencies on the WCML to Edinburgh via Carstairs (including the recent junction upgrade), essentially to hourly
- bi-mode trains running north of Edinburgh from the ECML, and an increased frequency to London (LNER)
You can reach Edinburgh by 1219 (0807 ex Birmingham) on an Avanti off-peak ticket (also cheaper than XC).When you include tenuous elements like that, shouldn't you also include the negatives of slashing of direct services from Scotland to destinations in England and the withdrawl of long-distance off-peak rail tickets to/from Scotland priced by Cross Country. It's now impossible to get to Edinburgh on a standard off-peak ticket on an XC service from Birmingham that arrives before 3pm.
No. Longannet was not at any point mothballed. One consequence of the SAK reopening was to take the Longannet coal trains off the Forth Bridge. Alloa passenger numbers hugely exceeded estimates.Wasn't Edinburgh Park developer funded with a long and drawn out process that resulted in a 2 platform station when BR (it took a while!) wanted a 4 road station to enable express services to overtake the stoppers?
Also wasn't Alloa just a happy consequence of the freight line to Longannet being un-mothballed on the cheap to keep the lights on?
No. Longannet was not at any point mothballed. One consequence of the SAK reopening was to take the Longannet coal trains off the Forth Bridge. Alloa passenger numbers hugely exceeded estimates.
Reading through the Google searches, as far as I can see, the Stirling to Dunfermline route was indeed mothballed.
The purpose of the reopening of the SAK route was to take coal trains off the Forth Bridge, and the consequence was the ability to reopen Alloa station. Not the other way round.
No. Longannet was not at any point mothballed. One consequence of the SAK reopening was to take the Longannet coal trains off the Forth Bridge. Alloa passenger numbers hugely exceeded estimates.
Excluding the portion of line between Kincardine and Dunfermline.Reading through the Google searches, as far as I can see, the Stirling to Dunfermline route was indeed mothballed.
Is it materially any different to the system employed at St. Bees Golf Halt in 1914?Is it worth mentioning the new kiosks on Far North Line at Scotscalder etc. where boarding passengers now alert the driver electronically, potentially speeding up services?
Did that station have a computer screen with upcoming departures with a call system that transmitted to the train?Is it materially any different to the system employed at St. Bees Golf Halt in 1914?
I suspect they'll be watching this trial to see what comes of it. I note we have heard nothing on passenger numbers since it began, but we await the eventual result.Have we had the removal of "peak" fares from October 2023 until at least June 2024 which seems quite a bold move. Is anything similar currently in place anywhere south of the border?
Considering they introduced it as a promotion there’s nothing to restore as it times out on the due date (unless extended, of course). As for a fear I’d adverse reaction, what would make this any more special than - say - banning the influx of Bully dogs or the deposit return scheme?Will Transport Scotland be able to restore peak fares? I doubt it given the Government's absolute fear of negative headlines.
The original plan in 2020 was to do most of the network by 2035 but the financial situation has drastically worsened. It's going to take a lot longer than that. We're still waiting for the "refresh" to the plan that was first promised for spring 2023, then "by the end of 2023".I hope that Transport Scotland will focus on wiring most of their existing lines in the next few years.
Paisley Corridor Improvements. Quite a major project, cost £170 million. Included 2 new platforms at Central: https://www.railway-technology.com/projects/paisley-corridor/?cf-view&cf-closedA third track was laid between Shields Junction and Arkleston to increase capacity between Glasgow Central and Paisley Gilmour Street, originally as part of the Glasgow Airport Rail Link project. I can’t recall the exact date but was something around 2015.
This allowed the Glasgow to Ayr service frequency to be doubled to 4tph though this was subsequently reversed in the Fit for the Future cuts.
It's going to take two years to complete the few miles up to East Kilbride. I can't see much else starting much before 2026. Hope I'm wrongThe original plan in 2020 was to do most of the network by 2035 but the financial situation has drastically worsened. It's going to take a lot longer than that. We're still waiting for the "refresh" to the plan that was first promised for spring 2023, then "by the end of 2023".