I'm trying to envisage how those deck panels relate to the beams that have gone in? The beams have rows of tightly spaced upright bolts on the top, but I'm struggling to see how they relate.3 main beams, 2 went in this morning, presumably other one will be tonight
Seem to have opted more for a light grey colour rather than Cotswold stone colour to match the surroundings
View attachment 141234View attachment 141235View attachment 141236View attachment 141237View attachment 141238
Will probably automerge
Update Monday 21 August 2023
4 new photos, 2 showing 3rd main beam now in, 2 with large stack of deck panels
View attachment 141310View attachment 141311View attachment 141312View attachment 141313
Network Rail were supposed to have finished in May, and on that basis a road closure of next bridge across Avon at Staverton was authorised for 5 month closure for Wessex Water works July-December. No one postponed that.Also, off-topic, but can I also pay my respects to anyone trying to cross from one side of the town to the other last week (and probably this week). Absolutely gridlocked by late morning on Thursday. Took 25-30 minutes to get off from Moulton Drive to get myself to Newtown. Unbelievable chaos
The deck panels are only about one traffic lane wide, took a photo from end of compound to show it, they also have skew ends as bridge is on a skew so span for each deck panel slightly longer.I'm trying to envisage how those deck panels relate to the beams that have gone in? The beams have rows of tightly spaced upright bolts on the top, but I'm struggling to see how they relate.
Network Rail were supposed to have finished in May, and on that basis a road closure of next bridge across Avon at Staverton was authorised for 5 month closure for Wessex Water works July-December. No one postponed that.
The deck panels are only about one traffic lane wide, took a photo from end of compound to show it, they also have skew ends as bridge is on a skew so span for each deck panel slightly longer.
Also took couple of photos with zoom and will see there appears to have been some sort of black bedding strip added since yesterday for deck panels to side of bolts. The outer edges have some brackets which must be something to do with sides of bridge.
View attachment 141350View attachment 141351View attachment 141352View attachment 141353
The "deck panels" are unlike anything I remember seeing before, but one thing I do know is that the posh term for the "bolts" on top of the beams is "shear connectors". Their role is to ensure that the beams "act compositely" with the concrete deck that will be poured around them. Without them, the concrete might slide over the beams when loads are applied.
Thank you, both.
Presumably, more concrete is going to be poured over the decking beams, once in situ? I've looked at the diagrams provided to the Council showing the "new bridge", but it isn't clear from that how these decking beams fit into the design.
The "deck panels" are unlike anything I remember seeing before, but one thing I do know is that the posh term for the "bolts" on top of the beams is "shear connectors". Their role is to ensure that the beams "act compositely" with the concrete deck that will be poured around them. Without them, the concrete might slide over the beams when loads are applied.
Correct, those 'bolts' aka 'studs' are shear connectors.The "deck panels" are unlike anything I remember seeing before, but one thing I do know is that the posh term for the "bolts" on top of the beams is "shear connectors". Their role is to ensure that the beams "act compositely" with the concrete deck that will be poured around them. Without them, the concrete might slide over the beams when loads are applied.
Thank you. V helpful!
I think this is the product installation guide. Mentions a 55mm minimum overlap at the plank ends, then the whole thing is covered in rebar and a deck poured that locks it all together.
By the way, to find the product I did a Google search for “permanent formwork concrete planks” and had a look around for something that looked right…
Most of the deck panels now in, also took so pictures in the compound with pallet full of some sort of spacers, powered wheelbarrows with tactile paving (but these might be for station, one platform is done, other isn't), and stored stone to rebuild the walls
Bradford on Avon - St Margaret bridge Good morning,
We’re sorry that we haven’t been in touch about the crane work that took place last night.
We have been struggling to get a suitable window of opportunity to install concrete slabs and steel components within the limited time being provided to us between train movements on the track. As a consequence, the number of nights the crane has been working has had to be extended, to that which was previously communicated.
The crane will be in use this evening to continue with the installation of the bridge deck. Any components not installed will be dismantled and installed manually, during day time working as this removes the reliance on the closure of the railway.
The Crane will leave the site on Friday morning.
We are sorry for any disturbance this may have caused and we’ll be back in touch with a further update.
Good evening,
We're sorry for the late message tonight but wanted to give you an update on the work we are carrying out on the bridge near you.
We'll be on site this weekend working between 8am and 6pm on both Saturday and Sunday. No work is scheduled for completion during the night time next week, so you should expect to see us working during the day.
Key dates for our programme and we'll be in touch nearer the time to advise of our the shift times.
- Deck construction in place by Tuesday 17 October
- Utility Services Reinstatement complete by Wednesday 22 November
- Removal of temporary services bridge by Tuesday 28 November
- Road Surfacing complete by Wednesday 29 November
- Road open - Thursday 30 November
These dates are subject to change. If this does happen, we will keep you updated.
Thank you for your patience and understanding as we continue to work here.
Parapets of new road over rail bridges have to meet latest standards aiming to prevent a road vehicle breaking through and falling onto the track.That's quite a muscular design of parapet.
I thought that might be the case - though I've not seen one quite like this before. Understandable in this location - a relatively narrow bridge, busy main road, steep hill either side, plenty of lorries...Parapets of new road over rail bridges have to meet latest standards aiming to prevent a road vehicle breaking through and falling onto the track.
There should be very few lorries, as there is a weight restriction a short distance away on the Town Bridge. But it is frequently ignored.I thought that might be the case - though I've not seen one quite like this before. Understandable in this location - a relatively narrow bridge, busy main road, steep hill either side, plenty of lorries...
On some, but not all, of the most recent batch of photos, metal parapets have been added above the concrete ones, and I'd guess these meet the standard for electrification.Slightly disappointed but completely understandably the parapets appear not to be tall enough for electrification requirements (although raising them isn't too hard, and the bridge itself should be fine).
Difficult to tell the exact height of parapet as road still needs to be laid, but based on herras fencing each end on existing footpath would say they will be about 1.7m (5.5 feet) above footpath surface height. Obviously will be error factor in my visual guessOn some, but not all, of the most recent batch of photos, metal parapets have been added above the concrete ones, and I'd guess these meet the standard for electrification.
Fairly sure 1.8m is the latest standard although it's all a bit academic as electrification would be quite far down the line (pun not intended) and the standards could change by then.Difficult to tell the exact height of parapet as road still needs to be laid, but based on herras fencing each end on existing footpath would say they will be about 1.7m (5'3") above footpath surface height. Obviously will be error factor in my visual guess
What height is needed for electrification ?
1.8m is my recollection but I think that one of the (fairly) recent changes was to add a substantial lateral design vehicle impact load at either 0.5m or 0.6m above the base. So I think a typical current design is 0.6m concrete upstand with a 1.2m steel or aluminium parapet above it.Fairly sure 1.8m is the latest standard although it's all a bit academic as electrification would be quite far down the line (pun not intended) and the standards could change by then.
Allowing for OLE under the bridge is quite different from the parapets. I'd be very surprised if the under-deck clearance wasn't OLE-ready just from the location tbh as it's a flat deck.I'd be very surprised if they didn't allow for OHLE even if it's a long time away. AIUI new footbridges on the SWR lines have to have OHLE clearance even though there's virtually zero chance of that replacing the existing third rail DC.
Plenty of clearance, there is a temporary crash deck (not yet removed) which is metal beams with wooden sheets above, the 3 main bridge beams are well clear of this. Must be about half metre between bottom of crash deck and lowest point of bridge beams, and of course space between top of trains and crash deck so probably at least 0.6m if not even moreAllowing for OLE under the bridge is quite different from the parapets. I'd be very surprised if the under-deck clearance wasn't OLE-ready just from the location tbh as it's a flat deck.