• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Austria (and perhaps other European countries?) return to full lockdown

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bikeman78

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2018
Messages
4,576
I've heard many saying the opposite too. The ones who I konw are off their feet were also the same way prior to COVID as well. One friend who works in a Nottingham hospital once said to me she was wondering why nobody ever made news that they were on 'red alert' (or whatever it was called, I can't remember) prior to 2020, yet now it is newsworthy.

There are some hospitals which are completely overrun more than normal, but there are also those who are fine.
Exactly this. Long before Covid, A&E departments had waiting times of two hours plus. People had to wait months for a routine operation. It seems unlikely that doctors and nurses had a quiet life before Covid.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

hst43102

Member
Joined
28 May 2019
Messages
950
Location
Tyneside
I've heard many saying the opposite too. The ones who I konw are off their feet were also the same way prior to COVID as well. One friend who works in a Nottingham hospital once said to me she was wondering why nobody ever made news that they were on 'red alert' (or whatever it was called, I can't remember) prior to 2020, yet now it is newsworthy.

There are some hospitals which are completely overrun more than normal, but there are also those who are fine.
November 2019 : https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-50397856
June 2018 : https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-44445303
February 2017 : https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-38859225
December 2016 : https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-38228411
January 2015 : https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-30679949
December 2013 : https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-25268451

Pressure on the NHS is nothing new. This problem should have been sorted years before Covid came along.
 

kristiang85

Established Member
Joined
23 Jan 2018
Messages
2,657
November 2019 : https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-50397856
June 2018 : https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-44445303
February 2017 : https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-38859225
December 2016 : https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-38228411
January 2015 : https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-30679949
December 2013 : https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-25268451

Pressure on the NHS is nothing new. This problem should have been sorted years before Covid came along.

Exactly. It feels like the government and NHS executives now have a nice scapegoat to say why the NHS is broken - COVID - and, even worse, the preferred method to deal with it is to put the burden on us ordinary people and guilt trip us into accepting restrictions on our lives to save the deity that is the NHS.

I, for one, can see through it and will not stand for it.
 

LAX54

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2008
Messages
3,759
Probably about 5 minutes, if your're lucky.

But don't let said Labour MPs read the following article about anti lockdown Sweden having Western Europe's LOWEST INFECTION RATE.

If we did the same, our infection numbers would be rock bottom !
 

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
17,786
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
If a society is prepared to go into lockdown — which at this stage it absolutely shouldn’t — then I don’t think it’s heavy handed at all. Nothing will persuade me that lockdowns are less impactful than forced vaccination. And that’s despite thinking compulsory medical procedures are ethically awful.

This really should be a false equivalence, but Austria has made it a real one.

Real or otherwise, it's a sick one. I see it as no different from forcing conversion therapy onto people, and that is a *very* nasty road for any country, let along a supposedly developed and civilised one, to be going down.

It is both disturbing and disappointing that Austria in particular, given their history, it leading the way on this.
 

MikeWM

Established Member
Joined
26 Mar 2010
Messages
4,420
Location
Ely
Or they are going to suffer the long-term consequences of the effects of repeated infection; or even die from the second/subsequent infection as their body was weakened after the first case.

But that's not how the immune system works (in an otherwise healthy individual, at least).
 

adc82140

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2008
Messages
2,936
Austria is a strange one for laws at the best of times. Using a dashcam there will attract a fine of 10,000 euros. Compare that to here where you often hear the phrase "police are appealing for dashcam footage".

The PM of the Czech Republic has already stated that there will be no similar lockdown there, because they believe the vaccines work. The Northern Ireland version of SAGE has said that there will be no lockdowns.

Therefore I think Austria will be seen as a wacky outlier.
 

AlterEgo

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
20,283
Location
No longer here
If a society is prepared to go into lockdown — which at this stage it absolutely shouldn’t — then I don’t think it’s heavy handed at all. Nothing will persuade me that lockdowns are less impactful than forced vaccination. And that’s despite thinking compulsory medical procedures are ethically awful.

This really should be a false equivalence, but Austria has made it a real one.
Exactly this.

I haven't been able to get a handle on how popular or otherwise the measures are in Austria yet.
 

greyman42

Established Member
Joined
14 Aug 2017
Messages
4,957
Vaccinations were sold to us as a means of getting back to "..normality.." (whatever that means) without the need for restrictions.

If you lock down the whole country, regardless of vaccination status, it makes you question what is the point of having the vaccination in the first place.
But we have not locked down the whole country so we carry on getting our vaccinations.
 

AlterEgo

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
20,283
Location
No longer here
It's down to semantics. What exactly are you saying is "experiment" and how do you define it?

To the average person, these vaccines really aren't experimental in any meaningful sense of the term.

The data we have on the effectiveness of these vaccines in a relatively short time is huge. People may complain about how quickly the data has been but this is due to huge sums being thrown at it and huge amounts of data collected

I don't understand how anyone with any sense can object to these vaccines; the alternative would either be crippling lockdowns or an acceptance of many deaths.
It's experimental in as much as the scale of the vaccine and the pace and urgency of the rollout. But that's it really.

I would view it akin to being able to solve the pandemic by making everyone take three car journeys in a year, but the car is a new model which works a little differently. People generally trust cars to be safe, and most people think brand new cars from established manufacturers will be safe even if they've not seen them operate before. People who would refuse to take three car rides because they've been on Google and seen the car is very new, the government is making me do it, did you see someone got very badly hurt in a car wreck the other day, I already DID a car journey in a similar car...just are not reasonable people.

The level of risk is extremely low and there is no good reason to refuse, especially a year in to the rollout. There's just about no scenario where taking a vaccine is more risky to you than catching COVID at any age.
 

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
17,786
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
It's experimental in as much as the scale of the vaccine and the pace and urgency of the rollout. But that's it really.

I would view it akin to being able to solve the pandemic by making everyone take three car journeys in a year, but the car is a new model which works a little differently. People generally trust cars to be safe, and most people think brand new cars from established manufacturers will be safe even if they've not seen them operate before. People who would refuse to take three car rides because they've been on Google and seen the car is very new, the government is making me do it, did you see someone got very badly hurt in a car wreck the other day, I already DID a car journey in a similar car...just are not reasonable people.

The level of risk is extremely low and there is no good reason to refuse, especially a year in to the rollout. There's just about no scenario where taking a vaccine is more risky to you than catching COVID at any age.

It's the business of no one else whether someone chooses to take a vaccine or not. "I don't want it" is a good enough reason for me. To do anything otherwise is embarking on a slippery slope which I for one don't which to test out.

What will be the next thing the government might want us all to do to ourselves, or (even worse) some of ourselves?

Meanwhile, there's lots of other things we do, or don't do, which potentially impact upon NHS capacity. Why special treatment for deciding whether to take a specific vaccine?
 
Last edited:

Mike395

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
23 May 2009
Messages
2,917
Location
Bedford
It's experimental in as much as the scale of the vaccine and the pace and urgency of the rollout. But that's it really.

I would view it akin to being able to solve the pandemic by making everyone take three car journeys in a year, but the car is a new model which works a little differently. People generally trust cars to be safe, and most people think brand new cars from established manufacturers will be safe even if they've not seen them operate before. People who would refuse to take three car rides because they've been on Google and seen the car is very new, the government is making me do it, did you see someone got very badly hurt in a car wreck the other day, I already DID a car journey in a similar car...just are not reasonable people.

The level of risk is extremely low and there is no good reason to refuse, especially a year in to the rollout. There's just about no scenario where taking a vaccine is more risky to you than catching COVID at any age.
Love that analogy and it's spot on in my opinion (noting that there are genuine cases where medical advice is that the vaccine is a heightened risk so the issue is more complex, but hopefully those people won't be taking advice from a railway forum!). That doesn't, however, mean I support mandation as there's an additional ethical grey area there.

In a vague attempt to steer this thread back on topic - it'll be interesting to see how other countries around Austria react from a border control perspective - somewhat suspecting that (perhaps Germany aside) nothing will happen there, which means I foresee a surge of cross-border early December breaks for those in Austria!
 

brad465

Established Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
7,074
Location
Taunton or Kent
Or they are going to suffer the long-term consequences of the effects of repeated infection; or even die from the second/subsequent infection as their body was weakened after the first case.
Or are they going to suffer the long-term consequences of the effects of repeated/long term restrictions, which has created mental health problems, addiction problems, undiagnosed non-covid ailments and/or financial concerns for many? The ONS have been reporting record alcohol deaths in 2020 and depression symptom experiences doubling from 10% to 20% of adults, for example. Also look at the ONS' weekly deaths registered reports and you'll see deaths have been in excess here for over 3 months, but would have been in excess anyway if no-one was dying with covid. I don't know what the situation is like in Austria with excess deaths but would not be surprised if similar collateral damage was being reported for specific conditions, with some minor variations depending on culture.
Love that analogy and it's spot on in my opinion (noting that there are genuine cases where medical advice is that the vaccine is a heightened risk so the issue is more complex, but hopefully those people won't be taking advice from a railway forum!). That doesn't, however, mean I support mandation as there's an additional ethical grey area there.

In a vague attempt to steer this thread back on topic - it'll be interesting to see how other countries around Austria react from a border control perspective - somewhat suspecting that (perhaps Germany aside) nothing will happen there, which means I foresee a surge of cross-border early December breaks for those in Austria!
There was of course a musical where a group used a folk concert interval to break for the Swiss border, but lets not go too far down that road.
 

MikeWM

Established Member
Joined
26 Mar 2010
Messages
4,420
Location
Ely
The latest UK vaccine surveillance report - which can be found here - show that in the last 4 weeks in over 18s, there were

- 2692 hospitalisations in the unvaccinated
- 6233 hospitalisations in the fully vaccinated

When you break it down by group and vaccine uptake, then yes, pro rata the unvaccinated are significantly more likely to be hospitalised than the vaccinated. But in terms of actual numbers and pressure put on hospitals, the fully vaccinated are well in the majority.

Even with 100% of people vaccinated, and assuming the vaccine cuts the chance of hospitalisation by about 70%, we're talking about 400 hospital admissions a week that could be prevented if you forced *everyone* to be vaccinated. Is that really worth destroying basic principles of our society?

And perhaps as importantly, does anyone really think that without those 400 weekly admissions, suddenly all these public health officials and NHS spokespeople would decide the pandemic was over?
 

greyman42

Established Member
Joined
14 Aug 2017
Messages
4,957
Even with 100% of people vaccinated, and assuming the vaccine cuts the chance of hospitalisation by about 70%, we're talking about 400 hospital admissions a week that could be prevented if you forced *everyone* to be vaccinated. Is that really worth destroying basic principles of our society?
I wonder how many of those could of avoided needing hospital treatment by living a more healthy lifestyle?
 

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
17,786
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
I wonder how many of those could of avoided needing hospital treatment by living a more healthy lifestyle?

We have one at work who has spent a considerable amount of time shielding. Gone from slightly overweight to heavily obese. Hardly a great outcome from the last 18 months. How many others?
 

43066

Established Member
Joined
24 Nov 2019
Messages
9,478
Location
London
We have one at work who has spent a considerable amount of time shielding. Gone from slightly overweight to heavily obese. Hardly a great outcome from the last 18 months. How many others?

Several like that where I work, too. The usual (lazy, lead swinging) suspects. The rest of us just get on with things and, on the bright side, there’s plenty of rest day work available for those who want it.
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
67,936
Location
Yorkshire
The latest UK vaccine surveillance report - which can be found here - show that in the last 4 weeks in over 18s, there were

- 2692 hospitalisations in the unvaccinated
- 6233 hospitalisations in the fully vaccinated

When you break it down by group and vaccine uptake, then yes, pro rata the unvaccinated are significantly more likely to be hospitalised than the vaccinated.
Exactly.

But in terms of actual numbers and pressure put on hospitals, the fully vaccinated are well in the majority.
Fully vaccinated people account for the vast majority of the population, so of course this is the case; it's meaningless.
 

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
17,786
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
Several like that where I work, too. The usual (lazy, lead swinging) suspects. The rest of us just get on with things and, on the bright side, there’s plenty of rest day work available for those who want it.

To be fair, for those genuinely in the extremely vulnerable category, it was a bit of a no-win situation, as following the guidance properly essentially meant remaining indoors, where the opportunity for exercise is quite limited. The one concerned was quite spooked by the whole thing, and was very uncomfortable even going to places like rural walks which were busier than normal especially last year.

However one way or other, it's certainly not a good outcome to have put on a shed load of weight.
 

MikeWM

Established Member
Joined
26 Mar 2010
Messages
4,420
Location
Ely
Fully vaccinated people account for the vast majority of the population, so of course this is the case; it's meaningless.

It isn't a surprise, if that's what you mean by 'meaningless', but what it does mean is that if we're judging how we're doing by the yardstick of how many people are in hospital and how many are dying, then those numbers aren't going to be shifted much by persuading/coercing/forcing the remaining unvaccinated people to be vaccinated.

It shows that anyone saying 'well things are bad now, but if only we could vaccinate some more people, we'd be fine' isn't actually correct, because at this point it won't make that much of a difference (400 hospital admissions a week *across the entire country* really isn't going to make the difference between the NHS being fine and it breaking down).
 

duncanp

Established Member
Joined
16 Aug 2012
Messages
4,856
The latest UK vaccine surveillance report - which can be found here - show that in the last 4 weeks in over 18s, there were

- 2692 hospitalisations in the unvaccinated
- 6233 hospitalisations in the fully vaccinated
I think this is because most people are vaccinated now.

So a smaller percentage of vaccinated people being hospitalised multiplied by a larger number of vaccinated people means more vaccinated than unvaccinated people will end up in hospital.

What would be interesting is to know the average length of stay in hospital for vaccinated vs unvaccinated people.

I see that the Austrian lockdown is going to last a maximum of 20 days (yeah, right).

That means the lockdown could be classed as a "circuit breaker", and we all know how effective they are at suppressing the virus, don't we?
 

adc82140

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2008
Messages
2,936
The latest UK vaccine surveillance report - which can be found here - show that in the last 4 weeks in over 18s, there were

- 2692 hospitalisations in the unvaccinated
- 6233 hospitalisations in the fully vaccinated

When you break it down by group and vaccine uptake, then yes, pro rata the unvaccinated are significantly more likely to be hospitalised than the vaccinated. But in terms of actual numbers and pressure put on hospitals, the fully vaccinated are well in the majority.

Even with 100% of people vaccinated, and assuming the vaccine cuts the chance of hospitalisation by about 70%, we're talking about 400 hospital admissions a week that could be prevented if you forced *everyone* to be vaccinated. Is that really worth destroying basic principles of our society?

And perhaps as importantly, does anyone really think that without those 400 weekly admissions, suddenly all these public health officials and NHS spokespeople would decide the pandemic was over?
Up to a third of daily "admissions" actually are already in hospital when they test positive. If you're admitted to hospital for anything, then you're likely to be quite sick anyway. People will still die in hospital as a result of heart failure, cancer, pulmonary embolus, etc etc. Some of these will have tested positive. Still we don't get daily figures for people admitted to hospital who are ill because of Covid, nor to we get daily figures of deaths where Covid is the primary cause. "within 28 days of a positive test" or "where Covid is mentioned on the death certificate" means nothing.
 

kylemore

Member
Joined
28 Aug 2010
Messages
1,046
Real or otherwise, it's a sick one. I see it as no different from forcing conversion therapy onto people, and that is a *very* nasty road for any country, let along a supposedly developed and civilised one, to be going down.

It is both disturbing and disappointing that Austria in particular, given their history, it leading the way on this.
Well exactly.

You would hope given the history that there were dissenting voices in the Austrian Government attempting to make them see sense and avoid this insanity.
 

WestRiding

Member
Joined
21 Mar 2012
Messages
1,014
Well, at least it's for everyone I suppose.

Austria is a very strange country.
Looks like Germany is about to follow.....
Chuffing sick of this. Not been out of the country for nearly 2 years, just booked Germany thinking travel was a thing again, and looks like missing out again.
 
Last edited:

WestRiding

Member
Joined
21 Mar 2012
Messages
1,014
Following the news that Austria is to enter a Full Lockdown from Monday, all the papers are reporting that Germany will probably follow. When will this nonsense ever end....?

COVID-19: Germany may follow Austria into full lockdown as coronavirus cases hit new high​

Berlin warns it could join its neighbours in closing schools, shops and bars - as Vienna hits out at "radical anti-vaxxers and fake news" after revealing plans for compulsory jabs.​

 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
15,348
Every year the NHS is under pressure; this year the pressure is far worse than usual.
Every year is always worse than the last in the NHS world. The NHS whinging about this year being the worst ever is as predictable as the clocks changing at the end of November.
 

AlterEgo

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
20,283
Location
No longer here
Looks like Germany is about to follow.....
Chuffing sick of this. Not been out of the country for nearly 2 years, just booked Germany thinking travel was a thing again, and looks like missing out again.
It's one region of Germany, I think.

One of the big problems Germany and Austria have is that the state pays for absolute horse poop treatments like homeopathy which literally does not work. Anti-medical views and an insistence against invasive treatment is the core issue driving anti-vaxx views in those countries.

Covid has destroyed many people's ideas of the continental European being somehow more sophisticated and wise. France and Germany have had peak Covid cringe at various points, much worse than the UK. We should be grateful we have held our nerve.

Incidentally, it is the furthest right parties in those countries which are most against mandatory vaccination.
 

WestRiding

Member
Joined
21 Mar 2012
Messages
1,014
It's one region of Germany, I think.

One of the big problems Germany and Austria have is that the state pays for absolute horse poop treatments like homeopathy which literally does not work. Anti-medical views and an insistence against invasive treatment is the core issue driving anti-vaxx views in those countries.

Covid has destroyed many people's ideas of the continental European being somehow more sophisticated and wise. France and Germany have had peak Covid cringe at various points, much worse than the UK. We should be grateful we have held our nerve.

Incidentally, it is the furthest right parties in those countries which are most against mandatory vaccination.
Hope you're right. Was hoping to go to Hamburg in December. Sick of it now. Absolutely sick of it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top