No I don't.
This debate started when it was suggested that, under FoM, more people had moved from the UK to settle in the EU than had moved from the EU to settle in the UK. I produced figures showing that was incorrect and that the excess (EU to UK over UK to EU) was probably about 2m. We could argue over the exact number (and I doubt anybody really knows) but it seems common ground that the excess is that way and it is fairly well accepted that the number is 2m +/- a bit.
The result of this is that, regardless of what percentage of the various populations those numbers represent, the EU27 was blessed with accommodation freed up for 2m people (with the consequential reduction in pressure on their public services) whilst the UK had to find accommodation for that number(with the consequential extra burden on public services).
You immediately muddied the waters:
Whilst you may not be interested in the absolute numbers, it is those numbers who have to be accommodated and whatever percentages they represent, the UK had to cope with an increase of 2m people, whilst the EU27 enjoyed a 2m loss. Whilst FoM existed, the vast majority of people both in the UK and in the EU were happy where the were. But some took advantage of FoM - more in the EU than in the UK (whic. To make a proper comparison of percentages you would have to examine the numbers who moved from each country and which countries they moved to - an exercise in futility I would suggest. But I have already shown that >5% of Lithuanians now live in the UK and 2.6% of Portuguese live here. By contrast, the country receiving the most UK people moving elsewhere is Spain. Around 300,000 Brits live in Spain but this represents only about 0.45% of the UK population.
Those statements are disingenuous. We are discussing what happened under FoM whilst the UK was an EU member. To make a fair comparison you would have to look at all the people who moved to different EU countries, including those who moved from the remaining 27 member nations (say) from Bulgaria to (say) Germany. Much as it suits your argument, you cannot treat the EU as a single entity and the UK as a stand alone country. Whilst FoM existed, the vast majority of people both in the UK and in the rest of the EU were happy where the were. But some took advantage of FoM - more in the EU than in the UK (which is scarcely surprising as there are about seven times more people in the EU27). But there was more to FoM that between the EU27 and the UK - much more.
The only lie in what you've said is the introduction of Turks into the frame. It is not a lie to say that 450m people had the unfettered right to settle in the UK. It is factually correct. Nobody with any sense believed they were all standing on the doorstep waiting to come in (if so, why didn't they come earlier?) and nobody with any sense believed the Turks were involved in the scheme. As I've said frequently: anybody casting a vote, be it is an Election for the Parish Council or a referendum, who makes their choice based on what politicians tell them could or might happen is foolish. There were lies told on both sides before the referendum because that's what many politicians do.