• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Bridge problem cardiff Central 20/4/25 route blocked Newport Cardiff

John R

Established Member
Joined
1 Jul 2013
Messages
4,431
Or even a service from Central to Pontypridd, and then pick up the planned diagram.

As an aside, when I first became interested in railways the line from
Aber (Junction, as was) to Taffs Well was still available. A fairly short line, imagine the additional flexibility if that was still open.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

The exile

Established Member
Joined
31 Mar 2010
Messages
4,648
Location
Somerset
I guess for the same reason that the GWR Cardiff to Portsmouth services are terminating at Bristol instead of Newport. It can be chaotic at Newport at the best of times, so I'm guessing it can't cope with a significant increase in terminating services
If there were a properly integrated railway, then the North & West lines trains could be diverted to Bristol (ideally reversing at Newport) thus covering the south end of the line properly and substituting for the cancelled Pompey trains.
 

AdamWW

Established Member
Joined
6 Nov 2012
Messages
4,456
The last time the bridge between Queen St and Central was closed for an extended period was due to a landslip and it was shut for 2 weeks, back in 2012.

According to this article, back then Arriva managed to turnaround Rhymney & Coryton trains at Queen St.

That seems to refer to just post-match evening services. I'd be most curious as to how they managed that, if they did.
 

Peter Sarf

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
7,533
Location
Croydon
Does anyone know any more about the actual damage to the bridge ?.

I am wondering if it is similar to the landslip that happened in 2012 albeit with the actual steel work moved this time ?.
Which might make it a more involved repair.
The last time the bridge between Queen St and Central was closed for an extended period was due to a landslip and it was shut for 2 weeks, back in 2012.

According to this article, back then Arriva managed to turnaround Rhymney & Coryton trains at Queen St.

Conjecture but this time the presence of 25KV OHLE might make for it being a bit more "interesting".
 
Joined
4 Jun 2023
Messages
15
Location
Newport
Does anyone know any more about the actual damage to the bridge ?.

I am wondering if it is similar to the landslip that happened in 2012 albeit with the actual steel work moved this time ?.
Which might make it a more involved repair.

Conjecture but this time the presence of 25KV OHLE might make for it being a bit more "interesting".
I wonder if the 25Kv clearance monitor activated?
 

Peter Sarf

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
7,533
Location
Croydon
I wonder if the 25Kv clearance monitor activated?
Good point. Would explain the problem being referred to as a moved girder rather than a bridge bash.
I wonder if it is the 25KV infrastructure that has been bashed. That would make it an easier fix taking days not weeks.

Two feet is a long way for a bit of bridge to move after all.

The bridge carrying the Valley lines over the main was found to have shifted.

From someone I know within the railway, they had been informed it had moved a couple of feet which, if that's the case, I'd going to cause quite a serious issue over the coming days.

Relief lines have been closed
Hmm, bit of a tenuous guess on my part.
 

Jez

Established Member
Joined
22 Jan 2011
Messages
1,743
Location
Neath
Someone on X has asked the same question as I asked here last night - why some services are being terminated in Shrewsbury many miles away from the issue at Cardiff. As usual they gave an answer not related to the question asked and told them tickets are valid with Crosscountry. When asked further the online person at TFW said they not sure but think its to do with too many terminating trains in Newport. But that still doesnt explain why they couldnt go to Cwmbran, Abergavenny or even Hereford.

Obviously it isnt the person answering the messages fault. But it just shows the complete lack of communication. No wonder passengers get fed up!
 

30907

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
20,512
Location
Airedale
Why do the Holyheads need to be cancelled at Shrewsbury?
There may be a crew diagram issue?
But an hourly service south of Shrewsbury isn't unreasonable, and a random check suggests that the Manchester stoppers are calling additionally at Pontypool Rd.
 

Jez

Established Member
Joined
22 Jan 2011
Messages
1,743
Location
Neath
There may be a crew diagram issue?
But an hourly service south of Shrewsbury isn't unreasonable, and a random check suggests that the Manchester stoppers are calling additionally at Pontypool Rd.
True. But why cant TFW just tell us the exact reason for it. We would know then!
 

Peter Sarf

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
7,533
Location
Croydon
True. But why cant TFW just tell us the exact reason for it. We would know then!
Probably an explanation that is "too detailed" for the average punter to understand ?.
Us railway staff/enthusiasts lap up the detail.

TALKING OF DETAIL
Surely someone by now has a picture of the problem or a good insight......
 

vicbury

Member
Joined
17 Mar 2012
Messages
984
Location
Bristol
If there were a properly integrated railway, then the North & West lines trains could be diverted to Bristol (ideally reversing at Newport) thus covering the south end of the line properly and substituting for the cancelled Pompey trains.
Or the service from Bristol could at the very least terminate at Severn Tunnel Junction, with all CrossCountry services additionally stopping there for connections. It is quite ironic that this issue at Cardiff has made it exceedingly hard for me to get to Bristol (from Lydney) but the vast majority of services to Cardiff from here are running!
 

Benjwri

Established Member
Joined
16 Jan 2022
Messages
2,345
Location
Bath
Or the service from Bristol could at the very least terminate at Severn Tunnel Junction, with all CrossCountry services additionally stopping there for connections. It is quite ironic that this issue at Cardiff has made it exceedingly hard for me to get to Bristol (from Lydney) but the vast majority of services to Cardiff from here are running!
Where do trains go after terminating there? It would block the line for any through services.

There are still options to go via Newport to Bristol (An hourly service until midnight), and I would expect station staff or GWR on X might authorise you to travel via Gloucester instead, if your ticket doesn't already allow it, if you ask.
 

AdamWW

Established Member
Joined
6 Nov 2012
Messages
4,456
Probably an explanation that is "too detailed" for the average punter to understand ?.
Us railway staff/enthusiasts lap up the detail.

TALKING OF DETAIL
Surely someone by now has a picture of the problem or a good insight......

And talking of communications, this, from TfW on Twitter:
Supporters attending today's Cardiff City match should be aware that due to on-going repairs to a bridge near Cardiff Queen Street, services are running but may be amended.
seems a rather optimistic way of saying that some routes are closed completely and some have a significantly reduced service.
 

Jez

Established Member
Joined
22 Jan 2011
Messages
1,743
Location
Neath
Probably an explanation that is "too detailed" for the average punter to understand ?.
Us railway staff/enthusiasts lap up the detail.
Yes your right we just like to know the detailed explanation behind everything whilst the average customer just accepts the train is cancelled and that's that!
 

WAB

Member
Joined
27 Jun 2015
Messages
1,095
Location
Anglia
Now I know it's easy to criticise from the sidelines, but I really do find it very hard to understand the necessity to have a title that says it's just Coryton affected, lower down say it's Caerphilly too, then not mention disruption through Pontypridd at all, but just hint at it by mentioning bus ticket acceptance on those routes.
It was much the same during the bad weather over the winter. I’m not sure whoever is posting these messages has actually looked at how they appear for the public.

I’m fairly surprised at the questions around the Rhymney line not being open, when there’s a well publicised closure until mid-May for electrification between Caerphilly and Rhymney…

This should reduce the number of people impacted directly I guess.
People will be getting the pre planned rail replacement buses between Rhymney and Caerphilly, expecting a train onwards to Cardiff. Instead, six trains per hour will be reduced to one bus per hour. I can understand why that’d be a problem today, let alone during the working week.
 
Last edited:

Peter Sarf

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
7,533
Location
Croydon
And talking of communications, this, from TfW on Twitter:

seems a rather optimistic way of saying that some routes are closed completely and some have a significantly reduced service.
Crickey. They really are in a parallel universe I fear.
 

AdamWW

Established Member
Joined
6 Nov 2012
Messages
4,456
Yes your right we just like to know the detailed explanation behind everything whilst the average customer just accepts the train is cancelled and that's that!

That's not been my general experience of people for whom trains are just transport. They won't want as much detail, but they'd still like to know what's happened.

And talking of communications, this, from TfW on Twitter:

seems a rather optimistic way of saying that some routes are closed completely and some have a significantly reduced service.
Crickey. They really are in a parallel universe I fear.

Quite.

Like the one in which the wires to Caerphilly went live in February when they were supposed to despite the planned bridge closures not happening, and when they did happen in April it was just due to some testing. Despite the placards all over the place warning of the imminent energisation of the wires...

It was much the same during the bad weather over the winter. I’m not sure whoever is posting these messages has actually looked at how they appear for the public.

And indeed just about any time there's disruption.
I suspect that the Journeycheck messages are auto-generated from some kind of input rather than just being written out by hand.
Unfortunately this often results in complete nonsense (e.g. saying that a line is blocked and that may cause delays and cancellations, or that more trains than usual need repairs between X and Y).
As you say, it doesn't look as if anyone actually looks at what's being output.
 

Bow Fell

Member
Joined
12 Feb 2020
Messages
291
Location
UK
And indeed just about any time there's disruption.
I suspect that the Journeycheck messages are auto-generated from some kind of input rather than just being written out by hand.
Unfortunately this often results in complete nonsense (e.g. saying that a line is blocked and that may cause delays and cancellations, or that more trains than usual need repairs between X and Y).
As you say, it doesn't look as if anyone actually looks at what's being output.

They’re not auto-generated, they are input from a member of staff using Tyrell, the problem is the choice of wording is pre-defined.

The first will be the reason, so you select that from hundreds of reasons

Second you choose the location and time expected until the disruption ends and what lines are affected.

What is the impact? You can select from cancelled/delayed/revised/terminate at/start at etc.

Then there is ticket acceptance info and rail replacement info which you can freeform in the Customer Advice or Additional Info box, sometimes I prefer freeform here as it makes more sense.

Unfortunately, sometimes it doesn’t read great and that’s a limitation of the system.

To answer, why Holyheads services are starting/terminating at Shrewsbury, Network Rail will have told TfW you need to thin the service out and looking at agreed contingency plans, this is the result.
 

AdamWW

Established Member
Joined
6 Nov 2012
Messages
4,456
They’re not auto-generated, they are input from a member of staff

That's exactly what I meant - someone is providing input which may actually make sense, but the system is then generating nonsense with it.

They’re not auto-generated, they are input from a member of staff using Tyrell, the problem is the choice of wording is pre-defined.

The first will be the reason, so you select that from hundreds of reasons

Second you choose the location and time expected until the disruption ends and what lines are affected.

What is the impact? You can select from cancelled/delayed/revised/terminate at/start at etc.

Then there is ticket acceptance info and rail replacement info which you can freeform in the Customer Advice or Additional Info box, sometimes I prefer freeform here as it makes more sense.

Unfortunately, sometimes it doesn’t read great and that’s a limitation of the system.

Thanks for the explanation.

But in my view this is not an excuse for TfW having such a rubbish system, though it might be for the individuals forced to use it.

And if there was really no alternative to listing all the disruption under "Cancellations to services between Cardiff Central and Coryton" then it really, really needs to go.

It's like the TfW Live Route Status page.

I have no idea how they have come up with something that can and often does say "good service" when the on-line departure boards are a rash of cancellations. I'm pretty sure I could do better with access to a suitable API.
But given that they can't, why is the page still there? Misleading information is worse than no information.
 

Bow Fell

Member
Joined
12 Feb 2020
Messages
291
Location
UK
Thanks for the explanation.

But in my view this is not an excuse for TfW having such a rubbish system, though it might be for the individuals forced to use it.

And if there was really no alternative to listing all the disruption under "Cancellations to services between Cardiff Central and Coryton" then it really, really needs to go.

It's like the TfW Live Route Status page.

I have no idea how they have come up with something that can and often does say "good service" when the on-line departure boards are a rash of cancellations. I'm pretty sure I could do better with access to a suitable API.
But given that they can't, why is the page still there? Misleading information is worse than no information.

It’s a universal system that pretty much every TOC uses because of how it feeds JourneyCheck and the CIS through Darwin. It isn’t perfect, however I find it quick and easy to use even though it doesn’t read back so well at times. But they are the tools that we are all given. I’ve worked with it for almost 10 years and the interface and what you can do has never really changed that much.

Not making excuses but Control Staff pretty much make do with what we’re given. Customer Information through such systems is a huge passion of mine, and I think there are times we can do better but we are limited by the equipment we have.

Unfortunately, again because of the algorithm, one or two cancellations will show “good service” if you think about it one or two cancellations on a line that has a very frequent service is “good” where as if it was an hourly or two hourly that threshold is different. Once CSL2 is activated all lines should show “Red” and “Major Disruption”
 

andypops

Member
Joined
31 Mar 2011
Messages
169
People will be getting the pre planned rail replacement buses between Rhymney and Caerphilly, expecting a train onwards to Cardiff. Instead, six trains per hour will be reduced to one bus per hour. I can understand why that’d be a problem today, let alone during the working week.
I didn’t say there wasn’t a problem? You may need to give your head a wobble.

I stand by my statement that there are likely to be fewer people travelling from Rhymney - Caerphilly due to the pre-planned engineering work.
 

AdamWW

Established Member
Joined
6 Nov 2012
Messages
4,456
It’s a universal system that pretty much every TOC uses because of how it feeds JourneyCheck and the CIS through Darwin. It isn’t perfect, however I find it quick and easy to use even though it doesn’t read back so well at times. But they are the tools that we are all given. I’ve worked with it for almost 10 years and the interface and what you can do has never really changed that much.

I'm not blaming those who input the data, and it's great that it's easy to use for those entering the information.

But, from my point of view as someone using the information, it just doesn't work.

It's not a question of not reading back well. At least in the case of TfW, the information is often incomplete, misleading and just downright nonsense.

As an example, if a line is blocked then there aren't going to be trains until it opens, so don't tell me there may be cancellations or delays.

Unfortunately, again because of the algorithm, one or two cancellations will show “good service” if you think about it one or two cancellations on a line that has a very frequent service is “good” where as if it was an hourly or two hourly that threshold is different. Once CSL2 is activated all lines should show “Red” and “Major Disruption”

Believe me, it will show "good service" when there is far more than the odd train cancelled. Services through Queen Street can have fallen apart completely yet the screen is still happily showing "Good service" on all routes.

Although in any case I would assume "Good service" meant the full timetable running with minor delays at most.

As I said above it's easy to just sit on the sidelines carping. But over and over and over again TfW fail to give accurate and useful information when there's disruption and I do find it hard to believe that they couldn't do better.

On another note, Journeycheck seems to be suggesting a half hourly service tomorrow from Queen Street to Coryton but not Caerphilly. But nothing going the other way!
 

WAB

Member
Joined
27 Jun 2015
Messages
1,095
Location
Anglia
Thanks for the explanation.

But in my view this is not an excuse for TfW having such a rubbish system, though it might be for the individuals forced to use it.

And if there was really no alternative to listing all the disruption under "Cancellations to services between Cardiff Central and Coryton" then it really, really needs to go.

It's like the TfW Live Route Status page.

I have no idea how they have come up with something that can and often does say "good service" when the on-line departure boards are a rash of cancellations. I'm pretty sure I could do better with access to a suitable API.
But given that they can't, why is the page still there? Misleading information is worse than no information.
It should have been done route by route, which has now been done taking a look at Journey Check.
 

WelshBluebird

Established Member
Joined
14 Jan 2010
Messages
5,222
Now confirmed to be impacting tomorrow too. Kinda wish they'd just say it'll be a few days rather than just doing it day by day. If it's sorted before then great it's a bonus but at least set expectations a bit better. Maybe that's too harsh and they did genuinely think it would be sorted by the end of today but given where it is and the history there, my initial reaction was immediately that'll take them longer than what they are saying.
 
Joined
4 Jun 2023
Messages
15
Location
Newport
Now confirmed to be impacting tomorrow too. Kinda wish they'd just say it'll be a few days rather than just doing it day by day. If it's sorted before then great it's a bonus but at least set expectations a bit better. Maybe that's too harsh and they did genuinely think it would be sorted by the end of today but given where it is and the history there, my initial reaction was immediately that'll take them longer than what they are saying.
There is some interesting digging in this picture https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c70zl6d5881o
 

Top