221129
Established Member
I'm surprised they don't do a Lothian and just not give a damn about it!Finally, a bus operator has gone vocal about turning passengers away because the bus is40%full
I'm surprised they don't do a Lothian and just not give a damn about it!Finally, a bus operator has gone vocal about turning passengers away because the bus is40%full
It's a lot easier to impose measures than it is to remove them, especially when it's about keeping people safe. I'm sure McGill's would be subject to criticism in the media if they removed the capacity limits!I'm surprised they don't do a Lothian and just not give a damn about it!
That’s largely what McGill’s do in the west of Scotland too, and they also went back to normal service levels at the same time as Xplore Dundee. However, I think the issue is that the reduced capacity is now being reached on an increasing number of journeys on the busiest routes, so if there isn’t a change to the social distancing requirements soon, they risk losing passengers as they are unable to carry them safely.It's a lot easier to impose measures than it is to remove them, especially when it's about keeping people safe. I'm sure McGill's would be subject to criticism in the media if they removed the capacity limits!
For the record, their subsidiary in Dundee do not limit capacity and leave it up to passengers to decide whether a bus is too full, either by not getting on, or getting off and catching the next bus. This is the primary reason Xplore reinstated full frequencies on all core routes a few weeks ago.
Most of the routes are not even back at pre covid frequencies, so they should have some resource knocking around.
Which is how it should be. People happily wedge onto trains into Brighton, or local trains around London. I doubt anyone that is worried about Covid is going anywhere near a bus anyway.For the record, their subsidiary in Dundee do not limit capacity and leave it up to passengers to decide whether a bus is too full, either by not getting on, or getting off and catching the next bus. This is the primary reason Xplore reinstated full frequencies on all core routes a few weeks ago.
Which is how it should be. People happily wedge onto trains into Brighton, or local trains around London. I doubt anyone that is worried about Covid is going anywhere near a bus anyway.
I've noticed similar behaviour on the tube. Some people won't sit in a seat between two other people but will stand six inches away from another person in a doorway.I noted with some amusement on Saturday that on Chiltern people were strictly avoiding the seats marked as out of use...and cramming into the vestibule instead. Somewhat counterproductive.
You are right there, my former work place had over 50% off with covid at the same time, some of these will have become long term and of course, some have died. Even in the high unemployment north east bus companies struggle to recruit and retain.You are assuming the level of resource is the same as pre-Covid. Drivers may have left and not been replaced, for example.
Change to allow greater bus capacity in England from 17 May
The Department for Transport has accepted a risk-based case produced by the Confederation of Passenger Transport (CPT) for the use of every forward-facing seat on bus services in England. As a result, that will be permitted outside London from Monday 17 May where capacity is currently constrained on busy journeys.
While the change will be welcomed by operators that have seen difficulties on certain trips, CPT has been careful to stress that the development does not represent a ‘big bang’ approach of a return to full capacity across the board.
The Confederation adds that the relaxation – agreed by Under-Secretary of State for Transport Baroness Vere – is in response to issues experienced on some journeys under the current limitation that allows around 40-45% of a bus’s total seating to be used. Demand is expected to further increase shortly as further restrictions in England are lifted. Rear- and side-facing seats still should not be used after 17 May, however.
“This is about trying to solve problems at peak times,” says a CPT spokesperson. They add that at less busy times, it should still be the case that passengers are expected to socially distance when on board. However, the Confederation believes that if the step was not taken now there is a risk of long-term damage to patronage and a diversion of some customers to “unsustainable modes.”
CPT’s risk-based case represents an update of a previous document from 2020. It enabled the use of one of every pair of forward-facing seats, except by those travelling in family groups where both positions can be occupied. CPT says that the 17 May change takes into account the low prevalence of COVID-19, the rapid rollout of the vaccination programme and a greater knowledge of on-bus ventilation.
In acknowledging the risk-based case document, Baroness Vere notes that the safer transport guidance for operators already states that when a 2m distance cannot be kept, a 1m distance should be maintained – but “where possible.” Therefore, the 1m distance is not an “absolute requirement,” says CPT.
In a letter to CPT Chief Executive Graham Vidler dated 10 May, Baroness Vere says that each operator should be encouraged to implement safety measures – including social distancing – based on the circumstances of their operation, as well as learnings gained throughout the pandemic. Lady Vere adds that each operator should adopt a consistent approach going forwards “to avoid confusion among passengers.”
The change does not apply to coaches, CPT adds. However, it is working to build a separate, evidence-based case for the coach sector that it expects to deliver “very soon.”
It is good news, we were told about it today.Great news to hear. I was worried about capacity as things ease on Monday.
We have been told all forward facing seats will be able to be used so presumably that will be the case for all operatorsI had a guy on the other afternoon having a go at me right up against the screen because the bus was "too full" and that I shouldn't allow 2 school kids to stand in the empty buggy bay (I don't really care if they choose to stand but even so I couldn't see them as the cab door frame obstructs that side of the mirror on those buses)
I just told him to jog on in the end, I had 21 passengers on a bus that's allowed 21 passengers.
Edit: Also been told our capacities are up from Monday, but not sure by how much yet.
Yes, that's my understanding too - all seats available except any bench type or rearward facing.We have been told all forward facing seats will be able to be used so presumably that will be the case for all operators
Yes, that's my understanding too - all seats available except any bench type or rearward facing.
Thats what I have also heard, max capacity increases to equal all forward facing seats. But off-peak still recommended to only use the window seats (unless family group)
Hopefully TfL, and the devolved nations follow suit!
I used the X5 from MK to Oxford on Monday, and the largest number on board was I think 4.
Ha. Most drivers will do anything they can to keep their bus as empty as possible…Took an extremely busy double decker Stagecoach route 3 from Kingsbridge to Dartmouth today, which bizarrely included six dogs. Fortunately they were good boys; everyone in holiday mood. Later the bus I was on passed a 12 from Paignton to Torquay showing Bus Full, when it was nothing like. I wonder if the driver knows the new rules yet?
Obviously the driver of the 3 was a dog lover then!Ha. Most drivers will do anything they can to keep their bus as empty as possible…
I’d probably sooner drive around dogs, than members of the general public tbh. Bet the bus would be cleaner too!Obviously the driver of the 3 was a dog lover then!