• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Chiltern May 2023 timetable change - for the worse or better?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jimini

Established Member
Joined
8 Oct 2006
Messages
1,407
Location
London
Long time ago now but in my experience the bus predominantly catered for passengers out of Aylesbury as far as Princes Risborough and then into High Wycombe from the villages outside it. There weren't too many people doing the whole route.

Most employment in Aylesbury and in High Wycombe is not in the town centre - it's all in Cressex business park etc. Nearly everyone just drives. Those on the train probably have no choice and so will continue to use it.

They're pretty good about holding the shuttle where they can for up to 10 mins and I even saw them hold a London bound train recently to avoid a long wait

That hill in Wycombe from the station to Cressex business park is quite unforgiving as I recall!
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

sammyg901

Member
Joined
24 Mar 2009
Messages
326
That hill in Wycombe from the station to Cressex business park is quite unforgiving as I recall!
I never tried walking it! There was a handy little shuttle bus when I was working there briefly

Re: the flooding issues, I saw a tweet from the local MP that these will be resolved in August. Not sure if that is when the line will close for the HS2 works as well
 

njimiller

New Member
Joined
30 Dec 2017
Messages
1
Quite a few appear to relate to the 1Y06 0605 from Oxford which is only 4 cars. This is followed by a 6 car from Bicester North 10 minutes later which may be a better option for Beaconsfield / Gerrards Cross commuters at least until Oxford-Paddington reopens
I took this 6-car getting on at Denham Golf Club on Tuesday morning and there were still plenty of seats available even after its final stop at Denham. However, I note this morning (Wednesday) it was short-formed to 5 carriages.

Why are there two hour gaps in the West Ruislip service midday - the cost of an additional stop must be miniscule. It would not have been allowable under the Passenger Service Requirement in my day, but of course, the DfT can issue derrogations.
Same two hour gap at Denham Golf Club. I queried this with them via Twitter and there answer was about extended station dwell times which meant both Ruislips and DGC couldn't be served every hour. When I queried why this was allowed as it contravened the Passenger Service Requirement of the franchise contract, I was told that the DFT will be aware of the changes.

Extended dwell times was also the reason given as to why DGC is the only station not served by the 00:10 otherwise all stations to Aylesbury (to be fair DGC only became a stop on this service during the pandemic). Due to the extended dwell times, a stop at DGC would mean the train not clearing the line in time for Network Rail engineering work. It does seem that a minute has been added between many station stops.
 

12LDA28C

Established Member
Joined
14 Oct 2022
Messages
3,280
Location
The back of beyond
Re: the flooding issues, I saw a tweet from the local MP that these will be resolved in August. Not sure if that is when the line will close for the HS2 works as well

Yes it is. The branch will be closing for ten weeks so it makes sense to replace the culvert at the same time.
 

Nova1

Member
Joined
26 May 2021
Messages
382
Location
Stratford-Upon-Avon
What is the point of this? Is this just a train that would otherwise run ECS?

1684926846210.png


This is now the only direct service from Stratford-Upon-Avon to London, at 21:33 in the evening. Disappointing given it used to be almost 1per 2 hours to London pre-covid.
 

cle

Established Member
Joined
17 Nov 2010
Messages
4,040
Very strange stopping pattern too! But maybe it's 'skipping' with another service?
 

sammyg901

Member
Joined
24 Mar 2009
Messages
326
Yes it is. The branch will be closing for ten weeks so it makes sense to replace the culvert at the same time.

Just saw a Bucks Free Press report - total closure of Aylesbury either way for 10 days during August and then the branch will be closed until October
 

12LDA28C

Established Member
Joined
14 Oct 2022
Messages
3,280
Location
The back of beyond
Just saw a Bucks Free Press report - total closure of Aylesbury either way for 10 days during August and then the branch will be closed until October

That's because the culvert at Aylesbury runs beneath all 3 lines so no trains can run whilst this work takes place. Better to do it in the summer holidays when less people are travelling...
 

JW4

Member
Joined
14 Feb 2023
Messages
272
Location
Birmingham
Why has Acocks Green lost all of its Chiltern Services in the timetable change, seems a bit odd
 

12LDA28C

Established Member
Joined
14 Oct 2022
Messages
3,280
Location
The back of beyond
Why has Acocks Green lost all of its Chiltern Services in the timetable change, seems a bit odd

Maybe Chiltern considered that the station was served sufficiently by WMT and opted to concentrate its services where there is no alternative operator?
 
Last edited:

JW4

Member
Joined
14 Feb 2023
Messages
272
Location
Birmingham
@12LDA28C
Thought the Leamington spa service would call there maybe, given all the London and Banbury it used to have are gone and the LMS 2 hourly service just passes through fast to Solihull, Dorridge, Lapworth
 

Birmingham

Member
Joined
14 Mar 2020
Messages
496
Location
United Kingdom
Thought the Leamington spa service would call there maybe, given all the London and Banbury it used to have are gone and the LMS 2 hourly service just passes through fast to Solihull, Dorridge, Lapworth
Can’t think why a minor suburban station would need to have regional express services calling. That’s the job of the local operator.
 

JW4

Member
Joined
14 Feb 2023
Messages
272
Location
Birmingham
Can’t think why a minor suburban station would need to have regional express services calling. That’s the job of the local operator.
It only has two evening services on weekdays to Leamington Spa, Lapworth has calls on the two hourly Chiltern Birmingham-Leamington service as well as some calls on London services and it’s a significantly smaller station.
 
Last edited:

Mikey C

Established Member
Joined
11 Feb 2013
Messages
6,865
Having needed to go to Great Missenden yesterday (and not paying attention to the Chiltern changes as it's not my regular line) I was really surprised that they're not running a consistent all day half hourly service, with for example two "27" departures the 11:27 and 12:27 departures out of Marylebone removed.

Why those two?
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,995
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Just saw a Bucks Free Press report - total closure of Aylesbury either way for 10 days during August and then the branch will be closed until October

Could you link to the article? Cheers.

As for the timetable, there's a longer gap than I recall between morning peak trains from Vale Parkway. There are also a lot of overcrowded 2 car workings in the evening.

Edit: Found the article, it's in the Herald: https://www.bucksherald.co.uk/news/...eek-aylesbury-closure-due-to-hs2-work-4155857

The long closure is just the Princes Risborough branch.

Jacqueline Dey, Chiltern Railways' operators director, said: "The damaged culvert has led to numerous short-notice cancellations this year, and we are pleased that a permanent fix will be in place before the end of the summer. Customers should be mindful that Network Rail and HS2 works will close the railway between Princes Risborough and Aylesbury for a further ten weeks after these repairs, with the line reopening again on Monday 30 October. Rail replacement buses will be in operation during this time, and customers should check before they travel.
"We know that this is a significant, long-term closure, but we are confident that the railway between Princes Risborough and Aylesbury will be more reliable as a result of these important works."
 

HamworthyGoods

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2019
Messages
3,956
Having needed to go to Great Missenden yesterday (and not paying attention to the Chiltern changes as it's not my regular line) I was really surprised that they're not running a consistent all day half hourly service, with for example two "27" departures the 11:27 and 12:27 departures out of Marylebone removed.

Why those two?

Costs simply - the trains in the middle of the day on a weekday are usually very quiet.
 

12LDA28C

Established Member
Joined
14 Oct 2022
Messages
3,280
Location
The back of beyond
Having needed to go to Great Missenden yesterday (and not paying attention to the Chiltern changes as it's not my regular line) I was really surprised that they're not running a consistent all day half hourly service, with for example two "27" departures the 11:27 and 12:27 departures out of Marylebone removed.

Why those two?

Because they were the Aylesbury terminators and they have retained the xx57 which run through to (and return from) Aylesbury Vale Parkway.


So the article claims a ten-day closure to repair the culvert but the dates given clearly indicate a 12-day closure.
 

Mikey C

Established Member
Joined
11 Feb 2013
Messages
6,865
Because they were the Aylesbury terminators and they have retained the xx57 which run through to (and return from) Aylesbury Vale Parkway.
But it's only those 2 Aylesbury terminators that have been removed, the 13:27, 14:27 and 15:27 are still running.
 

12LDA28C

Established Member
Joined
14 Oct 2022
Messages
3,280
Location
The back of beyond
But it's only those 2 Aylesbury terminators that have been removed, the 13:27, 14:27 and 15:27 are still running.

As you might expect due to the time of day, those services were identified as being the most lightly used so the stock was reallocated elsewhere to increase capacity on busier trains.
 

sammyg901

Member
Joined
24 Mar 2009
Messages
326
From my observation the timetable seems to be going OK, from what I've heard from friends there are a couple of problems in the AM peak - between 6.30-7am at High Wycombe / Beaconsfield there are a few short trains that have come from far out which are very busy. The bulk of the capacity only runs a bit later. Also an issue around 9am from Banbury with a couple of short trains then too.

Evening peak seems to be OK

Aylesbury Vale Parkway peak service is about right for the demand, there is a bit of a gap in the morning but you work around it, services in the evening more or less every 30 mins.

Lots of shortforming still at the moment though with a few units gathering dust and dirt at Aylesbury!
 
Joined
3 Jan 2014
Messages
31
As you might expect due to the time of day, those services were identified as being the most lightly used so the stock was reallocated elsewhere to increase capacity on busier trains.
But they are used, just slightly less than the others. Same as trains from Aylesbury, they are used but they've been removed anyway.

The Met line is treated with contempt by Chiltern nowadays. Football at Wembley, cancel trains all day. Singalong at Wembley, cancel the evening trains. Get a bus to Beaconsfield instead. No idea why they don't just say use the Met from Amersham or run a shuttle Aylesbury to Amersham
 

12LDA28C

Established Member
Joined
14 Oct 2022
Messages
3,280
Location
The back of beyond
But they are used, just slightly less than the others. Same as trains from Aylesbury, they are used but they've been removed anyway.

The Met line is treated with contempt by Chiltern nowadays. Football at Wembley, cancel trains all day. Singalong at Wembley, cancel the evening trains. Get a bus to Beaconsfield instead. No idea why they don't just say use the Met from Amersham or run a shuttle Aylesbury to Amersham

Chiltern attempt to match the provision of stock to passenger demand, which is why those services were cut from the timetable to provide capacity where it is needed more. Although I agree, the service on the Met could be better, and cancelling trains on the Met due to a concert at Wembley is completely unacceptable.
 

md2016

Member
Joined
3 Feb 2023
Messages
23
Location
Haddenham
From my observation the timetable seems to be going OK, from what I've heard from friends there are a couple of problems in the AM peak - between 6.30-7am at High Wycombe / Beaconsfield there are a few short trains that have come from far out which are very busy. The bulk of the capacity only runs a bit later. Also an issue around 9am from Banbury with a couple of short trains then too.

Evening peak seems to be OK

Aylesbury Vale Parkway peak service is about right for the demand, there is a bit of a gap in the morning but you work around it, services in the evening more or less every 30 mins.

Lots of shortforming still at the moment though with a few units gathering dust and dirt at Aylesbury!

When trains aren't shortforming, the morning capacity feels about right.

The evening capacity on the slower trains to GX and Beaconsfield aren't great though on Tues-Thurs. Unless you're at the station well in advance, they've gone from standing for 20-25 minutes to standing for 30-35 minutes. As an aside, the Oxford service also seems to frequently slow down/ stop short of Seer Green, adding delays to that service.

Now the Nuneham viaduct has reopened, it would surely be more efficient to many more people to switch Beaconsfield and Seer Green on the Oxford/ High Wycombe service. As others have said, it's bizarre that Beaconsfield is one of the only stations that is faster off-peak than on-peak, when it is one of the busier stations. But I think they've sacrificed it to justify running the slower services.
 

sammyg901

Member
Joined
24 Mar 2009
Messages
326
Yes it does seem like a bad deal for Beaconsfield. Not an easy fix within the current setup as the Oxford services for passengers from stations like Bicester Village are already pretty slow, especially compared to pre-COVID

Seer Green is already a call in the xx.15 Oxfords. I wonder if they'd consider Beaconsfield in the xx.45 or just add it into a Birmingham service. Suspect all these services are also pretty busy though !
 
Joined
3 Jan 2014
Messages
31
Chiltern attempt to match the provision of stock to passenger demand, which is why those services were cut from the timetable to provide capacity where it is needed more. Although I agree, the service on the Met could be better, and cancelling trains on the Met due to a concert at Wembley is completely unacceptable.
I would disagree about capacity, the problems are surely of Chilterns own making with failing to maintain their stock or plan stock replacements properly, resulting in shortages. This only reveals how short of stock they are if they have to cut a handful of trains to bolster other services. There doesn't seem to be any plans to sort that out, even longterm.

Weekends it's now an hourly service all day for the Met. Feels like the 80's all over again.........
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,995
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
And I hope they are sending out more than a single 2 coach unit during the times of the day they deem "off-peak" at weekends when the service drops to hourly.

They are sending out 2 car sets which appear from anecdotal experience to be sufficient. The weekend leisure traffic on Chiltern Met services is tiny.
 

david1212

Established Member
Joined
9 Apr 2020
Messages
1,481
Location
Midlands
I would disagree about capacity, the problems are surely of Chilterns own making with failing to maintain their stock or plan stock replacements properly, resulting in shortages. This only reveals how short of stock they are if they have to cut a handful of trains to bolster other services. There doesn't seem to be any plans to sort that out, even longterm.

Back to the end of 2019 Chiltern had been run by Arriva for a few years with a very different style than the days of Adrian Shooter and Rob Brighouse. Had the style of latter continued Chiltern would have entered 2020 in a much better state. Even so how much of the current shortcomings are really of Chilterns own making rather than beyond their control? First the supply of parts is a network wide issue. Second staffing disputes both maintenance and operation are overall in the hands of the DfT / Treasury. Likewise stock, even if units were available at the depots would they be allowed to use them and are the Class 68 and stock sets fully utilised after allowing for maintenance? Longer term unless significant changes in policy again the DfT / Treasury will dictate any replacement stock new or cascaded.
 
Joined
3 Jan 2014
Messages
31
They are sending out 2 car sets which appear from anecdotal experience to be sufficient. The weekend leisure traffic on Chiltern Met services is tiny.
You clearly don't suffer Chiltern. Is weekend leisure traffic 'tiny' now because we can't rely on it? Football, cancel all trains, concert cancel all or some trains. West Coast shut, cancel all trains.

its more reliable to drive to Amersham, Chesham or Chalfont. Princes Risborough car parking is extortionate so no one goes there.

Evening hourly service more often 2 cars, full and standing is not a way to improve passenger numbers. Everyone seems to miss the point that Chiltern used to have enough stock, and now they don't. What's gone wrong?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top