Am I right in thinking they were a retrofit to the D stock to improve visibility through the train?
Yup, added during their refurbishment to improve visibility through the train.
Am I right in thinking they were a retrofit to the D stock to improve visibility through the train?
Looking at this video on Youtube, it would appear that the end of each car has been made more conventional by removing the end carriage windows, and a normal conventional type corridor has been fitted.
Looking at this video on Youtube, it would appear that the end of each car has been made more conventional by removing the end carriage windows, and a normal conventional type corridor has been fitted.
So are the individual units further apart? They don't look so closely coupled as they do in videos of the Marston Vale route.
Probably an improvement over the UIC rubber gangway used on the MV units together with the bizarre door control mechanism!
Good luck finding a path where you can do that, though.Is piling on the miles really the best testing. Surely stop/start, accelerate/brake, open/close doors every three or four minutes is a better representation of what the units will be subjected to?
It's probably been easier than normal for the last month or two. And even now the service in most places is thinned out. How about the Marston Vale line? No service currently, and even when it's up and running plenty of opportunity to fit a few extra paths in. The only downside might be confusion of passengers.Good luck finding a path where you can do that, though.
Brissle Girl is right, and 2000 miles ASAP is no damn good if the doors don't work reliably. Remember GBRf were running the 800s up and down at high speed but weren't stopping and opening the doors. Come inauguration in October 2017 look what happened at Bath Spa.Brissle Girl, Good points raised. Could it be they want to get the 2000 miles asap, and have the unit delivered to Wrexham and do all the stop start stuff on the Wrexham - Bidston line. Presume they have to upload the station data into the GPS to ensure the diesels cut out prior to and start shortly after station stops, and I think there are plenty of them on that line. I would think most problems (hopefully very few) will be this stop start and opening and closing of doors.
We shall see.
It's just a shame they've been ruined with that awful yellow front!A few photos of the recent test runs have been uploaded by Martin Loader. I must admit, I do like the look of the front of the TFW units.
It's just a shame they've been ruined with that awful yellow front!![]()
That is their logo yesI think the worst bit is the peculiar letter T on the front. Is that for TfW? The yellow bit on the MV units gave them the nickname, 'Penquins' .
It's just a shame they've been ruined with that awful yellow front!![]()
No 230 related cancellations at all for many weeks now. Though whether rail replacement buses suffer from excessive pollen I'm not sure.It's been really hot over the last week and the pollen count has been high. Has there been any sign of the issues seen last year on the Marston Vale line in those conditions?
I expect a lot of people thought that when they were introduced on the Marston Vale Line a year ago....These units are looking really good (inside and out). If they are introduced on the Wrexham - Bidston line smoothly they could be a company maker for Vivarail.
I too thought the yellow was odd so although it is no masterpiece this would be my idea...It's just a shame they've been ruined with that awful yellow front!![]()
The interesting thing from the conversation on the tweet is that they used 002 for a lot of their testing and so building these have been straightforward. 8 and 9 are also well advanced and work on 10 has started.