Thank you for the information. If you do see a notice about that it would be great if you could let us know.I am not sure of software updates. No notices have been issued so far. Usually they get issued when the software gets updated and "interesting" new "features" are discovered!
Today at the London Assembly Transport Committee meeting Mark Wild has answered my question. The software on the 345s will be updated before Christmas. Andy Byford had just clarified that the new version number being installed is 5.4.I'm wondering if this is because of a planned upgrade to the train based software in the 9 car units. It is costly to move 7 car units to the east so if there are 9 car units out of action while being upgraded any 7 car units might be needed. Has anyone any information on the upgrade? I may be imagining it, but I thought I read somewhere that it was scheduled shortly after the upgrade to ELR100 in the COS. I can't find the reference to it now.
It’s required as we take over GWR peak services next month which run in / out of platform 14 at Pad. Platform 14 can only accommodate 7 car 345s.I do find it a little odd Reading gets the 7-cars as these are by far the busiest trains of the three routes on the West. I will presume it is for diagram convenience rather than anything else.
It’s required as we take over GWR peak services next month which run in / out of platform 14 at Pad. Platform 14 can only accommodate 7 car 345s.
7-car sets can't do the Airport services due to the software version differences between the 7 and 9 car types.I do find it a little odd Reading gets the 7-cars as these are by far the busiest trains of the three routes on the West. I will presume it is for diagram convenience rather than anything else.
Why would they have been timetabled to use platform 14 when all the units were 9 cars until the last few weeks?True but that is only a select number of peak trains. I don't believe any of those listed in the the Tiger screenshot above are those special peak diagrams that TfL have taken over from GWR (nor could they be as that timetable isn't running yet. Indeed regular TfL services are never timetabled to use P14.
The rolling stock software upgrade has been delayed till December and there is another signalling software update at Christmas too.True but that is only a select number of peak trains. I don't believe any of those listed in the the Tiger screenshot above are those special peak diagrams that TfL have taken over from GWR (nor could they be as that timetable isn't running yet. Indeed regular TfL services are never timetabled to use P14.
The rolling stock software upgrade has been delayed till December and there is another signalling software update at Christmas too.
Having the diminishing number of 7 cars on the west side makes lots of sense as it reduces loco drag requirements (and cost) and means that any units awaiting conversion are close at hand.
A small number of 7car will presumably be needed till September when through running starts.
Why would they have been timetabled to use platform 14 when all the units were 9 cars until the last few weeks?
The first train of the day to Heathrow becomes a Hayes train so it’s operationally safer to keep 9 car trains on both those services.
There's no point in Bombardier/Alstom putting any effort into the 7-car software version as ultimately the fleet will all be 9 car and there are more than enough 9 car sets to work the routes that must have them (Airport). Far better to get the 9 car "full" version working properly and put all the available software development resource into getting them running correctly.Fair enough. The latest I heard was that 7-cars could do Hayes (the natural preference) or Heathrow but still seems not to have changed.
I never said they were - you brought up P14 initially. These are booked trains so will no doubt used the booked platforms (usually 12) which has no restrictions. What I'm saying is that 7-cars on Reading services is not ideal but this has been answered above as apparently they can still not run under ETCS / to Heathrow due to the software anomalies (which again I was under the impression had been resolved).
Heathrow needs to have ETCS functioning hence 9car. 7car software is still the older basic software without ETCS functionalityFair enough. The latest I heard was that 7-cars could do Hayes (the natural preference) or Heathrow but still seems not to have changed.
I never said they were - you brought up P14 initially. These are booked trains so will no doubt used the booked platforms (usually 12) which has no restrictions. What I'm saying is that 7-cars on Reading services is not ideal but this has been answered above as apparently they can still not run under ETCS / to Heathrow due to the software anomalies (which again I was under the impression had been resolved).
Fair enough. The latest I heard was that 7-cars could do Hayes (the natural preference) or Heathrow but still seems not to have changed.
I never said they were - you brought up P14 initially. These are booked trains so will no doubt used the booked platforms (usually 12) which has no restrictions. What I'm saying is that 7-cars on Reading services is not ideal but this has been answered above as apparently they can still not run under ETCS / to Heathrow due to the software anomalies (which again I was under the impression had been resolved).
At the other end of the Reading route it's a lot, lot quieter... My last early evening trip between Twyford and Reading I had coaches 8 and 9 entirely to myself. This year I've only had 2 TfL Rail train journeys west of zone 6 that could be described as 'somewhat busy'.I do find it a little odd Reading gets the 7-cars as these are by far the busiest trains of the three routes on the West.
At the other end of the Reading route it's a lot, lot quieter... My last early evening trip between Twyford and Reading I had coaches 8 and 9 entirely to myself. This year I've only had 2 TfL Rail train journeys west of zone 6 that could be described as 'somewhat busy'.
*Waves to our friends on the crowded Shenfield route.*
Yes I'm not sure why I was thinking about 7-cars to Heathrow so ignore me there! But a Hayes diagram might be more approriate no?
The first train of the day to Heathrow becomes a Hayes train so it’s operationally safer to keep 9 car trains on both those services.
The unit working xx32 to Hayes & Harlington does Hayes workings all day starting 0532 from Paddington.
The unit working xx02 to Hayes & Harlington all day does 9T01 0442 London Paddington to Heathrow Central and return first.
In an ideal world all effort will be going into converting the remaining 7-car 345s into their 9-car version asap - by adding the coaches already built.Indeed. I would have thought it is not beyond the realms of possibility to have 7-car working on the two Hayes diagrams (with some swap or alteration early in the day) for now but ultimately it's relatively short-term and not a priority issue.
In an ideal world all effort will be going into converting the remaining 7-car 345s into their 9-car version asap - by adding the coaches already built.
One day, one day, maybe soon....In an ideal world!
As 7cars will need to operate into P14 till next September (the most probably date for some services to start running through to the core - if the timetable aligns), it appears 7cars will be around for while yet. The current GWR Reading service times are the least likely to align with core running.One day, one day, maybe soon....
Yes, has been for some time - since May.Is 345010 now a 9-car?
Thanks very much!Yes, has been for some time - since May.