185
Established Member
- Joined
- 29 Aug 2010
- Messages
- 5,474
Could open the two disused Edgehill tunnels as a heritage underground railway
It isn't a really good idea at all. Hiring the train out for stag and hen dos is a ridiculous idea. Who wants a load of drunks roaming around the network? Merseyrail certainly doesn't because it has banned the consumption of alcohol on its network.That is a really good idea - could also have a toilet fitted.
It was the overall concept of it being hireable for special events which I suggested was a good idea.It isn't a really good idea at all. Hiring the train out for stag and hen dos is a ridiculous idea. Who wants a load of drunks roaming around the network? Merseyrail certainly doesn't because it has banned the consumption of alcohol on its network.
As for running it to special events. Retaining traction knowledge for a few trips to the golf or Southport air show per year would be ludicrously expensive and a complete pain and for what? A 3-car unit that can't multi with the rest of the fleet is hardly a crowdbuster.
Merseyrail are quite happy to have drunken people aboard when it suits them, e.g. whenever an Aintree or Chester race meeting disgorges.Who wants a load of drunks roaming around the network?
Actually, the historical angle is worth consideration whatever the intention. This unit's status as a 'Royal train', however tenuous, is of possible interest to non-preservationists. Again, 507001 is one of the most recently overhauled sets, so it's as good as it's likely to get regardless.If the intentis for it to be used then condition is more improtant anything else. First delivered/first in service/carried the Queen is of minimal importance if you want to run it. If it is case of it being a static exhibit, then the "firsts" are of greater importance.
That isn't a load of drunks roaming the network. It is public transport fulfilling its purpose, i.e. taking people to and from where they want to go, and certainly for the Grand National event they have bolstered security and staffing. So that is extra cost, but for the large numbers involved and the extra revenue they get it will be negligible. If they had to employ extra security for a few drunks on a stag do party train that cost wouldn't be negligible compared to the income.Merseyrail are quite happy to have drunken people aboard when it suits them, e.g. whenever an Aintree or Chester race meeting disgorges.
The Class 507 Preservation Society have reached an agreement to take over the ownership of a train that has served the Liverpool City Region for 46 years. Due to be scrapped later this year, subject to funding the train will now be taken to the Nant Mawr visitor centre 15 miles south of Llangollen for conservation work.
Train 507 001 was built in 1978 by BREL at their Holgate Road Works in York and has spent its entire life working on the Northern and Wirral lines of Merseryrail. On 25th October 1978 Elizabeth II unveiled a plaque at Moorfields station to open the Merseyrail network, before travelling on 507 001 to Kirkby. Now, the Class 507 Preservation Society are working to save 507 001 from the scrap yard and are about to launch an appeal to cover the costs of moving the train to secure storage at the Nant Mawr Visitor Centre.
Nant Mawr is a terminus of the long gone Potteries, Shrewsbury and North Wales Railway, (known informally as the ‘Potts Line’), which opened in 1866 to link the quarries of Criggion and Nant Mawr with the county town of Shrewsbury. Today the Nant Mawr visitor centre is home to the UK's largest collection of industrial monorail equipment (including some used in a James Bond film), a short narrow gauge line and over a mile of standard gauge track. There are also award winning nature trails through the surrounding woodland with many parts of the site having step-free access.
Funds needed
Whilst the Society have secured agreements with everyone involved for the train to be preserved, funds now need to be raised to move the train from the National Rail network to the Nant Mawr site. Expected to cost in the region of £10,000, the society is about to launch an appeal to cover the transport costs.
Society Chairman Robert Hampton said:
“It's fantastic news that we will be preserving this train for future generations. They have served the Liverpool City Region well in the 46 years since Elizabeth II travelled on this very train in 1978, be it taking people to and from work, for a day out to the seaside, or home after an evening out.
But we need to raise money to move the train from the mainline network to its new home at Nant Mawr or it faces being sent to South Wales and turned into razor blades. If everyone who remembers travelling on a train like this were to donate just £5.07 then we would be well on the way to saving this train for the people of Merseyside.
Mark Hignett from the Nant Mawr visitor centre said:
“I am thrilled that a train that carried Elizabeth II is coming to Nant Mawr. The area has many historic connections with Liverpool – lots of the city’s water comes from Lake Vyrnwy which is just 20miles away from us. We look forward to hosting this very special train.”
That hotbed of PEP derivative knowledge…Another PEP derivative bound for Wales!
Going by the sad demise of the 503 - I'd suggest it's for the better!Unfortunate that its not in merseyside, but it all sounds quite hopeful that it will be saved
I believe it’s actually on the English side of the border, despite the name.Another PEP derivative bound for Wales!
Surely the North Mersey branch is a much more reasonable proposal for local heritage?Could open the two disused Edgehill tunnels as a heritage underground railway
It's in a formerly Welsh-speaking area; Oswestry was in Wales before the marcher lordships were ended under Henry VIII.I believe it’s actually on the English side of the border, despite the name.
This has already been discussed at length on the relevant thread, so let us keep it there please.Surely the North Mersey branch is a much more reasonable proposal for local heritage?
Ten year agreement in place but certainly in the short / medium term as far as can be established, not under cover.Positive news, as long as Nant Mawr can keep it undercover and aren't inclined to kick out at some point in the future.
I was wondering why the unit couldn't be hauled by a Diesel Loco from the Merseyrail network to their nearest station at Gobowen and transport the last 6 miles by road.
I am not familiar with the Tanat Valley Railway or the local area round there, but from their website I think it the site is isolated from the National Rail network. Can anyone advise if this would be a cheaper option, or even possible?
To be fair that is about twice as much as I thought they would get in total. Let's be realistic, it doesn't matter how much publicity it gets they are not going to get £10K to transport a unit to some random, rural site in Wales to sit there for a few years until either the money runs out or they have a disagreement, followed by a trip to the scrappies.Hopefully some of the industry magazines will help spread the word about this. It's off to a bit of a slow start sadly.![]()
Its actually more expensive to haul it by rail then by road and it makes quite sense. Consider the cost to hire a loco, fuel, driver salary compared to loading it on lorry which costs around 3k-5k+, compared to rail which costs much much more.I was wondering why the unit couldn't be hauled by a Diesel Loco from the Merseyrail network to their nearest station at Gobowen and transport the last 6 miles by road.
I am not familiar with the Tanat Valley Railway or the local area round there, but from their website I think it the site is isolated from the National Rail network. Can anyone advise if this would be a cheaper option, or even possible?