• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Class 701 'Aventra' trains for South Western Railway: progress updates

pompeyfan

Established Member
Joined
24 Jan 2012
Messages
4,343
Because the RMT spent three years (or more?) going on strike on the SWR over DOO before accepting it, but now SWR isn't going to use DOO on the 701s. Union members voted to accept the following:

Is it a fact that SWR will not use any form of DOO? Or is that speculation in this thread?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Towers

Established Member
Joined
30 Aug 2021
Messages
2,520
Location
UK
So why didn't SWR plan it that way in first place and then add functionality at a future point rather than wasting years of software development leaving nearly a Billion pounds worth of rolling stock sitting idle and no doubt degrading as its been off the juice for so long. This has been one of the industries worst rolling stock introductions although not the only one and its about time the transport select committee teed up an enquiry.
Because, bluntly, there were very few options left on the table. Strengthening SWR suburban trains to 10 car had been done by acquiring the 456 fleet, bringing spare capacity at Waterloo had done by bringing the Eurostar platforms back into use, there really weren’t many places left to turn. Speeding up dwell times as much automation as possible in order to squeeze in extra services was about all that was left on the list of options! Covid meant of course that ultimately it wasn’t necessary.
 

Nicholas Lewis

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
7,239
Location
Surrey
Because, bluntly, there were very few options left on the table. Strengthening SWR suburban trains to 10 car had been done by acquiring the 456 fleet, bringing spare capacity at Waterloo had done by bringing the Eurostar platforms back into use, there really weren’t many places left to turn. Speeding up dwell times as much automation as possible in order to squeeze in extra services was about all that was left on the list of options! Covid meant of course that ultimately it wasn’t necessary.
I get all that my point is the best strategy was to get trains in use then add the clever bits as a follow on upgrade and when proven move to the tighter timetable. Anyhow all irrelevant now and actually sensible to bin off all the clever stuff now but doesn't take away what an utter fiasco this has been from train builder through to operator which is why a Transport Select Committee enquiry would expose the background and expose the issues so they aren't repeated in the future.
 

LUYMun

Member
Joined
15 Jul 2018
Messages
1,173
Location
Cancelled
Because, bluntly, there were very few options left on the table. Strengthening SWR suburban trains to 10 car had been done by acquiring the 456 fleet, bringing spare capacity at Waterloo had done by bringing the Eurostar platforms back into use, there really weren’t many places left to turn. Speeding up dwell times as much automation as possible in order to squeeze in extra services was about all that was left on the list of options! Covid meant of course that ultimately it wasn’t necessary.
Whilst this is true SWR's franchise plans always looked ambitious to put it mildly. The network already struggled to run as many trains as timetabled, peak time services were consistently a few minutes late. But SWR planned to both increase and speed up services. Covid probably saved them somewhat, the trains were already full but trying to run more never really looked achievable.
Surely, as demand is expected to return to pre-pandemic levels by the mid-to-late-2020s (as mentioned in NR's Waterloo Approaches report), these short-term reversions must've bitten SWR in the backside, given that train capacity would still persist a problem when a sense of normality returns? More importantly, if it is vital to reduce the overcrowding on the Waterloo lines, wouldn't this be a stronger case for Crossrail 2 more than ever?
 

Goldfish62

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
11,661
Surely, as demand is expected to return to pre-pandemic levels by the mid-to-late-2020s (as mentioned in NR's Waterloo Approaches report),
I think that prediction can be looked back on now as hopelessly optimistic.
 

bb21

Emeritus Moderator
Joined
4 Feb 2010
Messages
24,153
Apologies but what does a door guard do? Do they just stand by the doors and press the button to open them? Seems a little silly...
701 GOPs are not equipped with door open buttons, so door release has to be done by driver. Dispatch only by guard.

The timetable pre-2020 was simply unworkable without the additional technology as the network did not have sufficient capacity to accommodate the number of services at the time with their booked lengths. Additional services had been specified and implemented without anyone really understanding what can be accommodated in reality. This had been proven by repeated simulation exercises. It (together with reduced infrastructure reliability) explains a significant part of why punctuality continued to decline for many years and ended up in a prolonged period of what can only be described as "abysmal".

Unfortunately from what I understand this recent development was caused by a massive clusterf*** by the company. The less said the better. If heads are being knocked together to bring the new trains into service, then I am glad at least some people are finally seeing sense.
 

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
9,779
Location
Hampshire
There seems to be some movement tonight, coming up from Southampton I travelled past 2 x 10 car 701s almost following each other towards Eastleigh. Both in testing with full interior lights on.
 
Joined
9 Dec 2012
Messages
713
Imagine having the fun job to ring up Mick Lynch and say "Sorry Mick bit awkward but you know that agreement we signed two years ago after all that suffering, can we pretend it didn't happen !"

What a circus this all is!
 

Goldfish62

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
11,661
701 GOPs are not equipped with door open buttons, so door release has to be done by driver. Dispatch only by guard.
Exactly the same method of operation as per Electrostars, IEPs, Pendolinos, etc.
 

Towers

Established Member
Joined
30 Aug 2021
Messages
2,520
Location
UK
Exactly the same method of operation as per Electrostars, IEPs, Pendolinos, etc.
80x (IETs) at least are fitted with door open buttons at the guards’ panels, which although the doors are intially released by the driver does mean that they can be swiftly reopened by the guard if needed during the dispatch process. This is a very sensible bit of design that seems to be overlooked all too often; the person pressing the door close button really ought to have the facility to quickly reopen them again if something develops.
 

Goldfish62

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
11,661
80x (IETs) at least are fitted with door open buttons at the guards’ panels, which although the doors are intially released by the driver does mean that they can be swiftly reopened by the guard if needed during the dispatch process. This is a very sensible bit of design that seems to be overlooked all too often; the person pressing the door close button really ought to have the facility to quickly reopen them again if something develops.
Are right. Well, the Southern Electrostars at least definitely do not have door open buttons on the guards panel, not that the guards panel is used anymore except for local door operation by the OBS.

Anyway, risking going OT here..
 

TRXsouth

Member
Joined
1 Aug 2020
Messages
56
Location
Surrey
And while the 701 saga continues, a week of very high temperatures for passengers to endure on 455s without air conditioning…..
 
Last edited:

Sun Chariot

Established Member
Joined
16 Mar 2009
Messages
3,355
Location
2 miles and 50 years away from the Longmoor Milita
Today's Eastleigh to Marchwood ran far earlier than booked and I arrived too late for photos. So here's 029 being shunted about the transfer/reception area. The other units were not being moved about.

I wonder at what point these can be treated as a "barn find"? :D
 

Attachments

  • 701029_Marchwood.JPG
    701029_Marchwood.JPG
    3.7 MB · Views: 153

wickham

Member
Joined
3 Feb 2021
Messages
363
Location
Knaphill
Regarding post 5947: Realtime Trains shows Monday's Worksop to Wembley movement as cancelled and the loco returning to Leicester. So presumably 701506/511 are STILL at Worksop.
 

Peter Wilde

Member
Joined
14 Oct 2019
Messages
95
Location
Surrey
Hopefully by next summer we can say different...
Not likely to happen on all lines, surely? Those slated for early introduction of 701s may be OK (or sometimes OK?) by next summer. But those of us further down the queue may be sweltering … again. The 455s have been good trains and will be sorry to see them go, but not in hot weather. Toilets on the new stock are long awaited too - if they prove to be working when needed.
 

Snow1964

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2019
Messages
8,060
Location
West Wiltshire
Another charge has been registered by Rock Rail South West
Unit 701 054

List of 701s with charges to Deutche Bank Luxembourg is now

004, 006, 011, 012, 013, 014, 015, 016, 017, 018, 019, 022, 023, 024, 025, 026, 027, 028, 029, 030, 031, 032, 033, 034, 035, 037, 038, 040, 041, 042, 043, 044, 045, 046, 047, 048, 049, 050, 051, 052, 054, 508, 509, 510, 512,

(41 units 10car, 4 units 5car)
430 vehicles of 750 (which is 57.33%)

Missing units are :
001-003, 005, 007-010, 020-021, 036, 039, 053, 055-060,
501-507, 511, 513-530
 
Last edited:

GeoffS

Member
Joined
1 Apr 2022
Messages
40
Location
Chichester
Another charge has been registered by Rock Rail South West
Unit 701 054

List of 701s with charges to Deutche Bank Luxembourg is now

004, 006, 011, 012, 013, 014, 015, 016, 017, 018, 019, 022, 023, 024, 025, 026, 027, 028, 029, 030, 031, 032, 033, 034, 035, 037, 038, 040, 041, 042, 043, 044, 045, 046, 047, 048, 049, 050, 051, 052, 054, 508, 509, 510, 512,

(41 units 10car, 4 units 5car)
430 vehicles of 750 (which is 57.33%)

Missing units are :
001-003, 005, 007-010, 020-021, 036, 039, 053, 055-060,
501-508, 510-511, 513-530
According to post 5,893 unit 053 was registered too: was this incorrect? May I point out also that 508 and 510 appear in BOTH the registered and missing lists above.
 

Top