Yes, all those. Plus mispronunciation of Barnstaple as Barnstable, like Whitstable: on news reports everything is 'ahead of' instead of 'before', and some newsreaders think we get vaccine dozes (if only the disease would doze!)
Except if you are referring to the Massachusetts town, which really is 'Barnstable'. That reminds me of the similar 'Tewksbury' in Massachusetts, which brings us back to Tewkesbury, Gloucestershire: apparently that's pronounced something like 'Chucksbury' - according to a local. Is that correct?
I don't think that would be very fair on the people of Malta
That does bring me to one of my other annoyances - people who claim that the UK is not part of 'Europe'.
Despite the actions of Mr Johnson and his government, we are still very much part, both geographically and culturally, of Europe. If we are not Europe, then four of the five New York boroughs (notably, Manhattan), Newfoundland and Vancouver Island are not North America. The seven continents include their geographically-associated offshore islands, not just the continental land masses themselves.
And doubtless the same people would try to deny that that the chalk downs of Pas-de-Calais are geologically related to - indeed, a continuation of - the North Downs....
Any ad which uses the expression 'two times' rather than 'twice'. Anyone able to shed any light on why?
Don't know for sure, but there was a dance track at the end of the 90s called 'Two Times'. From that maybe?
Regarding "Madchester", was that started by the music press back in the days when the Manchester bands The Stone Roses and Happy Mondays shot to fame?
Does anyone actually call the city Madchester? I have always taken it to refer to the music scene, not the city itself.
I could understand perfectly well when I saw a bus with "Not In Service" on the front - simple - but now it says "Sorry I'm Not In Service", as if we are all toddlers
Yes, this. Not so new either.
As a 12-year old I understood the meaning of 'Not in Service', so I'm sure most of us can.
There is more truly awful new music available today than there ever has been.
https://xponorth.co.uk/resources/ov...spotify-every-day-thats-nearly-one-per-second says:
Going OT, but with all this new music available why do the pop charts seem to be so slow-moving these days? Definitely since about 2010 there seems to be a slow-down to a near crawl. Back iin the 90s the long stays at the top of Bryan Adams and Wet Wet Wet were notoriously unique and just about everyone of any age was aware of them , while apparently a number of other tracks have come close to replicating those feats in the last 10 years which I have never even heard of - suggesting songs stay around by default these days. Maybe because mainstream contemporary radio just plays the same 40 tracks over and over again for 6 months? (Not sure, don't listen to contemporary radio anymore, I'm stuck in the 70s-00s... sorry)