• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Controversial railway opinions (without a firm foundation in logic..)

Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Shaw S Hunter

Established Member
Joined
21 Apr 2016
Messages
2,970
Location
Sunny South Lancs
I remember on pancake day a couple of years ago, trains were going to London St Pancake according to the platform info screens.
If there are so many people happy to continually use alternative names for the place perhaps it needs renaming officially. Possibilities: Kings Cross West, Euston East, Somers Town, (British) Library.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
39,236
Location
Yorks
Another flight of cancellations from York tonight.

Sunak is apparently visiting India today. Perhaps he can take a leaf out of India's book and get the bloody trains running !

The problem that many people have is confusing the spellings of 'gauge' and 'guard'....or is it 'guage' and 'gaurd' ?

Too many vowels in too many orders for me !
 

BilPel

New Member
Joined
9 Aug 2023
Messages
2
Location
Cornwall
I think my most "controversial" opinion would have to be: At privatization Intercity, NSE and Regional Railways should have been franchised off as whole entities rather than being split down by region/route. Open Access Operators would still be allowed on my "'ideal'" privatized network of course.

(However under the current fractured system I agree with a previous poster, in that "the more TOCs the better").
 

GatwickDepress

Established Member
Joined
14 Jan 2013
Messages
2,290
Location
Leeds
Anyone advocating the return of Pacers to the UK rail network should be made to live on one for a year first!

And it would have to be one with all the classic Pacer faults as well, ie toilets out of order, windows that only open in winter and heaters that only work in summer!
No different to the last student accommodation I had then! :D
 

urbophile

Established Member
Joined
26 Nov 2015
Messages
2,109
Location
Liverpool
I can never work out the correct spelling of gauge. It takes at least fifteen looks at the diary !
It's not the spelling that's the problem so much as the illogical pronunciation. What other word pronounces AU as AY?

Another flight of cancellations from York tonight.

Sunak is apparently visiting India today. Perhaps he can take a leaf out of India's book and get the bloody trains running !
I doubt if he'll see one, let alone ride one, since he will doubtless have his private jet.
 

Alanko

Member
Joined
2 May 2019
Messages
641
Location
Somewhere between Waverley and Queen Street.
The Americans never built a decent looking steam locomotive. They either look like children's toys (4-4-0 The General-style tender locos with fruity cow catchers, spark arrestors, big brass lamp lashed to the chimney) or things cobbled together Mad Max-style from spare parts from the oil industry. A series of black barrels crudely riveted together, teetering along on two dozen comically small driving wheels, black smoke billowing from yet another barrel on the top. Exponentially worse if in some sort of Shay or Mallet configuration with cams and driveshafts all over the place.

Noteworthy for delivering gargantuan power at the rail head, but not designed efficiently at all. I have no idea how anybody can get excited about them.
 

Krokodil

Established Member
Joined
23 Jan 2023
Messages
2,746
Location
Wales
The Americans never built a decent looking steam locomotive. They either look like children's toys (4-4-0 The General-style tender locos with fruity cow catchers, spark arrestors, big brass lamp lashed to the chimney) or things cobbled together Mad Max-style from spare parts from the oil industry. A series of black barrels crudely riveted together, teetering along on two dozen comically small driving wheels, black smoke billowing from yet another barrel on the top. Exponentially worse if in some sort of Shay or Mallet configuration with cams and driveshafts all over the place.

Noteworthy for delivering gargantuan power at the rail head, but not designed efficiently at all. I have no idea how anybody can get excited about them.
What about the streamliners built for Southern Pacific or New York Central?
 

Alanko

Member
Joined
2 May 2019
Messages
641
Location
Somewhere between Waverley and Queen Street.
What about the streamliners built for Southern Pacific or New York Central?

They look like the private transport of a high ranking Russian/German/generic baddie in a Bond film.


I read an interesting book a while back that linked the obsession with streamlining everything in the 1930s, including household objects such as steam irons or toasters, back to the eugenics movement. Say no more!
 

Sad Sprinter

Established Member
Joined
5 Jun 2017
Messages
1,869
Location
Way on down South London town
Hs2 should have been built as a London-Birmingham-Manchester route, via Moor Street, with an interchange created in the cutting of the existing lines on the exit from New Street. One train every 10 mins alternating between fast and slow trains. Slow trains will have three classes but the fast ones just two. Terminate HS2 at Manchester Victoria or better yet, Manchester Central, approach the tracks along that abandoned Midland viaduct *drools*. I don’t know why, I just love that idea.
 

eldomtom2

On Moderation
Joined
6 Oct 2018
Messages
1,557
The Americans never built a decent looking steam locomotive. They either look like children's toys (4-4-0 The General-style tender locos with fruity cow catchers, spark arrestors, big brass lamp lashed to the chimney) or things cobbled together Mad Max-style from spare parts from the oil industry. A series of black barrels crudely riveted together, teetering along on two dozen comically small driving wheels, black smoke billowing from yet another barrel on the top. Exponentially worse if in some sort of Shay or Mallet configuration with cams and driveshafts all over the place.

Noteworthy for delivering gargantuan power at the rail head, but not designed efficiently at all. I have no idea how anybody can get excited about them.
Personally I would put more emphasis on the "efficient design" part - there's no art to American steam locomotives, since they could always build bigger. While there is definitely an animal pleasure in the very large and very powerful, the best locomotives, like the best art, were born from limitations.
Mind you, Americans will get furious with you if you dare suggest their trains weren't perfect - I got jumped on a couple of days ago for saying that at no point in time could the US have been said to have the world's best passenger rail.
I read an interesting book a while back that linked the obsession with streamlining everything in the 1930s, including household objects such as steam irons or toasters, back to the eugenics movement. Say no more!
I read that book and didn't think much of it - academics tend to have an obsession with linking anything they can get their hands on back to unsavoury ideologies on flimsy evidence.
 

317 forever

Established Member
Joined
21 Aug 2010
Messages
2,611
Location
North West
Birmingham - Manchester should go over to LNWR using spare class 350/2s when available.

If Liverpool can manage without direct trains to Bristol or Reading, so can Manchester.
 

sprinterguy

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2010
Messages
11,072
Location
Macclesfield
The Americans never built a decent looking steam locomotive. They either look like children's toys (4-4-0 The General-style tender locos with fruity cow catchers, spark arrestors, big brass lamp lashed to the chimney) or things cobbled together Mad Max-style from spare parts from the oil industry. A series of black barrels crudely riveted together, teetering along on two dozen comically small driving wheels, black smoke billowing from yet another barrel on the top. Exponentially worse if in some sort of Shay or Mallet configuration with cams and driveshafts all over the place.

Noteworthy for delivering gargantuan power at the rail head, but not designed efficiently at all. I have no idea how anybody can get excited about them.
I like this, it made me chuckle and, ultimately I have to agree. Though I can't help but marvel at/cower from the sheer weight and power the Americans were ultimately able to achieve with steam power on Stephenson gauge (Noting another post above, I always have to think hard as to which way round the a and u go there) track.
 

bussnapperwm

Established Member
Joined
18 May 2014
Messages
1,515
Birmingham - Manchester should go over to LNWR using spare class 350/2s when available.

If Liverpool can manage without direct trains to Bristol or Reading, so can Manchester.
And the GWR should run the Resding/Bristol to Brum services
 

urbophile

Established Member
Joined
26 Nov 2015
Messages
2,109
Location
Liverpool
Personally I would put more emphasis on the "efficient design" part - there's no art to American steam locomotives, since they could always build bigger. While there is definitely an animal pleasure in the very large and very powerful, the best locomotives, like the best art, were born from limitations.
Mind you, Americans will get furious with you if you dare suggest their trains weren't perfect - I got jumped on a couple of days ago for saying that at no point in time could the US have been said to have the world's best passenger rail.
Bigger, louder and brasher is so often the American answer to everything, especially politicians.
 

sprinterguy

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2010
Messages
11,072
Location
Macclesfield
Birmingham - Manchester should go over to LNWR using spare class 350/2s when available.

If Liverpool can manage without direct trains to Bristol or Reading, so can Manchester.
There should be some direct trains to the south (that isn't London) from at least somewhere in the North West.

I could accept there being only one through train an hour (with the other path being 350/2s), though ultimately the perceived problem would go away entirely if the incumbent operator had sufficient and more appropriate rolling stock.
 

thaitransit

Member
Joined
8 Mar 2008
Messages
261
Location
Brisbane Queensland Australia
Here is something controversial.

What about returning it to a single operator nationwide eg British Rail. With fares that are simple and cheap regardless of when you travel?

Also moving to 100% reservations required on long distance regional services eg London to Glasgow etc. No more risk of having to stand and you can book the exact seat you want online in advance.

A return to checked luggage as an option on long distance trains no more concerns of where to put it or its safety during the trip.

How about a proper buffet car and a lounge car on long distance trains! You know proper cooked meals on a train to Manchester or Glasgow etc.

This is how it should be comfortable on all regional and long distance trains. Its not all about the fastest journey but the enjoyment of relaxing on the train perhaps having a meal in the buffer car or a drink in the lounge while travelling in a relaxed state as the hours go by.
 

xotGD

Established Member
Joined
4 Feb 2017
Messages
6,111
Also moving to 100% reservations required on long distance regional services eg London to Glasgow etc.
Just no. One of the advantages of rail over other modes is flexibility.

Get to the station earlier than expected? Jump on the earlier train. (Unless you have bought an Advance, but then you have exchanged flexibility for a financial benefit out of choice.)
 

sprinterguy

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2010
Messages
11,072
Location
Macclesfield
Here is something controversial.

What about returning it to a single operator nationwide eg British Rail. With fares that are simple and cheap regardless of when you travel?

Also moving to 100% reservations required on long distance regional services eg London to Glasgow etc. No more risk of having to stand and you can book the exact seat you want online in advance.

A return to checked luggage as an option on long distance trains no more concerns of where to put it or its safety during the trip.

How about a proper buffet car and a lounge car on long distance trains! You know proper cooked meals on a train to Manchester or Glasgow etc.

This is how it should be comfortable on all regional and long distance trains. Its not all about the fastest journey but the enjoyment of relaxing on the train perhaps having a meal in the buffer car or a drink in the lounge while travelling in a relaxed state as the hours go by.
I generally agree that this is how regional and long distance rail travel should be, but I agree with xotGD that 100% reservations undermines the turn up and go appeal of rail travel. It's largely that flexibility that attracts me to take the train.
 

CaptainHaddock

Established Member
Joined
10 Feb 2011
Messages
2,222
Also moving to 100% reservations required on long distance regional services eg London to Glasgow etc. No more risk of having to stand and you can book the exact seat you want online in advance.
.
Why stop there, that's nowhere near Draconian enough? All passengers on long distance services should be strapped into their seats with locked seatbelts that are not released until the train is nearing their destination. Refreshments, if required, would be brought to their seat and if they need the toilet they would have to press a button for traincrew to bring them a bucket.
 

AlastairFraser

Established Member
Joined
12 Aug 2018
Messages
2,218
Force EMR's Liverpool to Norwich service through Denton, Ashton and Victoria, instead of the Castlefield Corridor.

A lot of the time people miss connections at Picc, due to their poor punctuality on Liv-Norwich services.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
39,236
Location
Yorks
Personally I would put more emphasis on the "efficient design" part - there's no art to American steam locomotives, since they could always build bigger. While there is definitely an animal pleasure in the very large and very powerful, the best locomotives, like the best art, were born from limitations.
Mind you, Americans will get furious with you if you dare suggest their trains weren't perfect - I got jumped on a couple of days ago for saying that at no point in time could the US have been said to have the world's best passenger rail.

I read that book and didn't think much of it - academics tend to have an obsession with linking anything they can get their hands on back to unsavoury ideologies on flimsy evidence.

My God, when did they imagine that they did have the worlds best passenger service ?
 

Shaw S Hunter

Established Member
Joined
21 Apr 2016
Messages
2,970
Location
Sunny South Lancs
My God, when did they imagine that they did have the worlds best passenger service ?
Given that so many Americans assume the US is a massively improved version of Europe (and only a few actually visit) it hardly comes as a surprise that they could be deluded about rail services.
 

Krokodil

Established Member
Joined
23 Jan 2023
Messages
2,746
Location
Wales
Given that so many Americans assume the US is a massively improved version of Europe (and only a few actually visit) it hardly comes as a surprise that they could be deluded about rail services.
There is a segment of the American population who either believes that the US way is the best way, or they concede that the developed world functions better, but it couldn't possibly work over there, because: reasons.

Take high speed rail for instance. They claim that the US is too big to support it, but the coasts are very densely populated
 

xotGD

Established Member
Joined
4 Feb 2017
Messages
6,111
Force EMR's Liverpool to Norwich service through Denton, Ashton and Victoria, instead of the Castlefield Corridor.

A lot of the time people miss connections at Picc, due to their poor punctuality on Liv-Norwich services.
So making them walk from Victoria to Piccadilly will improve connections?
 

Top