I don't know, it's the first I've heard of it. It's pretty frustrating for us as well when these decisions are made.So what’s the excuse for terminating at Derby from the north on the date in question? The work appears to be between Derby and Tamworth.
Same thing happened on a weekend last year. Unfortunately you can't plan for diversions when some crews, even a small number, have had their route knowledge lapse.So what’s the excuse for terminating at Derby from the north on the date in question? The work appears to be between Derby and Tamworth.
You would have thought so, both sets that were at Neville Hill this morning have ended up in Laira tonight so they will definitely need at least one up there tomorrow night...
You can, because you could factor in crew changes at Birmingham and Derby and ensure those turns are resourced by crews with the relevant route knowledge.Same thing happened on a weekend last year. Unfortunately you can't plan for diversions when some crews, even a small number, have had their route knowledge lapse.
The 16:27 Plymouth - Leeds is being formed of one tonight which I thought that would be the case .
But not as simple as you might think. Originally the extra set (43184+366) was due to work 1E67 1627 PLY-LDS, but because 1V50 0606 EDB-PLY (43239/357) was over an hour late due to signalling issues between Exeter and Newton Abbot, they were swapped over; 43184+366 stepping up to work 1E63 1527 PLY-LDS and the set off 1V50 working 1E67 instead. They both end up at Neville Hill tonight, but by set swapping XC saved themselves either a part cancellation or a late start to 1E63.Extra set at Leeds tonight, is for this tomorrow.Realtime Trains | 1Z43 0802 Leeds to Kidderminster S.V.R. | 27/09/2022
Real-time train running information for 1Z43 0802 departure from Leeds to Kidderminster S.V.R. on 27/09/2022. From Realtime Trains, an independent source of train running info for Great Britain.www.realtimetrains.co.uk
You've missed my point. The crew is planned assuming everyone at a depot/link signs all routes worked by that depot/link. Therefore you can't plan for diversions when some crew, even a small number, have lapsed on the route knowledge. Otherwise there is a chance you have crew who have lapsed on route knowledge via Leicester rostered a job with work that way.You can, because you could factor in crew changes at Birmingham and Derby and ensure those turns are resourced by crews with the relevant route knowledge.
They wouldn't be rostered to a job they didn't sign. Crewplan would throw them off the job. I suspect that without RDW the concern is cover if there's service disruption similar to when HST's were temporarily withdrawn midweek last year.You've missed my point. The crew is planned assuming everyone at a depot/link signs all routes worked by that depot/link. Therefore you can't plan for diversions when some crew, even a small number, have lapsed on the route knowledge. Otherwise there is a chance you have crew who have lapsed on route knowledge via Leicester rostered a job with work that way.
Fair enough, I can only go by my own experiences at the TOC I work at, where in the past crews have been assigned jobs they didn't sign. So in XCs case you'd end up with an uncovered job, which you may or may not be able to cover, the RDW issues you mention particularly relevant here. Last time they had engineering works between Wichnor and Derby (earlier this year or last year, can't remember) they only managed one or two early morning and late evening services via Leicester on the Saturday and no diverts on the Sunday.They wouldn't be rostered to a job they didn't sign. Crewplan would throw them off the job. I suspect that without RDW the concern is cover if there's service disruption similar to when HST's were temporarily withdrawn midweek last year.
Reported on Facebook as power car shut down.I see the 0811 Leeds to Plymouth HST this morning only got as far as Sheffield where it was cancelled 'Due to a problem with traction equipment'
Does anyone know the full story?
No HSTs showing heading south from Leeds for the rest of the day!Any news on the HST that would normally be on the 9:10 from Leeds south ?
Is it running in a later slot ?
No HSTs showing heading south from Leeds for the rest of the day!
No HSTs showing heading south from Leeds for the rest of the day!
With this is mind...Is it likely that XC will once again restrict HST use to Fridays, Saturdays and Sundays only, possibly from next week, now that the summer peak is over? It wouldn't surprise me.
... are these the 'usual diagrams' for Mon-Fri or just for Fridays? The 125 group don't seem to be providing diagrams anymore and RTT only goes back a week (with the 12:27 from Plymouth last Monday apparently being a Voyager to Leeds due to disruption or engineering works). I'm trying to plan a trip to Newcastle by the end of October avoiding Voyagers and long stints on Fainsa seated units.From RTT Friday looks to be the usual two diagrams:
0611 Leeds - Plymouth
0606 Edinburgh - Plymouth
1227 Plymouth - Edinburgh
1527 Plymouth - Leeds
Due to engineering works at Newcastle the NE-SW services are terminating at York.Is it a strike timetable again? 1S51 ran to Edinburgh as a 7-car HST yesterday.
They are the normal diagrams for Monday to Friday subject to on the day changes etc like Monday just gone.With this is mind...
... are these the 'usual diagrams' for Mon-Fri or just for Fridays? The 125 group don't seem to be providing diagrams anymore and RTT only goes back a week (with the 12:27 from Plymouth last Monday apparently being a Voyager to Leeds due to disruption or engineering works). I'm trying to plan a trip to Newcastle by the end of October avoiding Voyagers and long stints on Fainsa seated units.
Thanks; don't need to restrict myself to travelling on Fri-Sun thenThey are the normal diagrams for Monday to Friday subject to on the day changes etc like Monday just gone.
It seems as though XC couldn't be bothered to provide passengers with more seats because of the disruption north of Newcastle.
1V50 06:06 from Edinburgh terminated at Newcastle at around 08:40/08:45.
Really that could have run the delayed 08:40 at 09:27 (47 minutes late that was) to Plymouth and the 16:27 back.
Instead they sent the HST straight back to Leeds. Not good luck for passengers when services are already busy enough.
During disruption there should be more seats when possible especially with the current reduced frequency!
I found your comment rather aggressive considering the circumstances and I hope there was no spite included. As Hamworthy stated above, the railway has many operational requirements and doesn't just operate because it can 'be bothered'.It seems as though XC couldn't be bothered to provide passengers with more seats because of the disruption north of Newcastle.
1V50 06:06 from Edinburgh terminated at Newcastle at around 08:40/08:45.
Really that could have run the delayed 08:40 at 09:27 (47 minutes late that was) to Plymouth and the 16:27 back.
Instead they sent the HST straight back to Leeds. Not good luck for passengers when services are already busy enough.
During disruption there should be more seats when possible especially with the current reduced frequency!
Alternative HST sourced from Laira with 43285/43303It's late due to a problem with power car 43366, so it might be going onto Laira when it gets to Plymouth.
It was late off Craigentinny, it's not losing any significant time, so it may have been fixed.
Alternative HST sourced from Laira with 43285/43303
Does anyone know what HST diagrams XC will run (if any) after this weekend's timetable change?