Backroom_boy
Member
Or maybe not, I've not heard many call it the Vic or the Pic"The Lizline"
Or maybe not, I've not heard many call it the Vic or the Pic"The Lizline"
Or maybe not, I've not heard many call it the Vic or the Pic
I'd say Crossrail is similar to RER A/B, but RER C is much more like Thameslink and RER D is more like the East London Line / Overground. Of course Paris has its own Overground network too, called Transilien, but the RER C and D with their lower branch frequency and more complex routes feels much more these than Crossrail.
I agree the 'mode' branding for the Elizabeth line is weird. I wonder what the plan will be if Crossrail 2 is ever brought back from mothballs. Will it be the same mode as Elizabeth Line or will we get yet another 'mode'?
If you are looking for detailed timings they are in the Timetable Planning Rules. See section 5 starting on page 16: https://nile.tfl.gov.uk/cdn/static/cms/documents/ccos-tpr2022rev1.pdf
Not to mention where you live. Those furthest from London, who say it once in a blue moon, seem keenest on the full long form.I hear these shortenings all the time, personally speaking. Maybe it depends on the age group and social status of who you mix with the most!
Not to people living in London!The problem with 'The Victoria Line' is that it can refer to the tube line or the main line trains running into Victoria (as opposed to the London Bridge lines etc.)
I do!Not to mention where you live. Those furthest from London, who say it once in a blue moon, seem keenest on the full long form.
Not to people living in London!
As for shortenings I don't know....I don't know of many other lines that a regularly shortened. Picc Line, Vic Line maybe that's about it. Liz line doesn't sound right haha.
Baker Street & Waterloo Railway? A shortening so popular it was formally adopted.
More seriously, the Metropolitan line is regularly shortened to the Met. I don't think I've ever heard anyone read out "Hammersmith & City Line" either - although, bizarrely, I can't think what they use instead - probably "not the circle line, the other one" or "the pink line".
People won’t call it the Elizabeth line, they’ll call it crossrail
Isn’t it known as the H&C?Baker Street & Waterloo Railway? A shortening so popular it was formally adopted.
More seriously, the Metropolitan line is regularly shortened to the Met. I don't think I've ever heard anyone read out "Hammersmith & City Line" either - although, bizarrely, I can't think what they use instead - probably "not the circle line, the other one" or "the pink line".
I can't see myself using Johnson's pet name for Crossrail though. I wonder what that late name change cost the ratepayers of London? Luckily, I'm not one of them.
It's already on OTT (with trial workings), and the detailed view on RTT. Less familiar with Traksy.Not sure if this has been asked already, but do we know when Crossrail will appear on Traksy, OTT etc.?
Crossrail is also on Signalmaps https://signalmaps.co.uk/#crossrail:755Not sure if this has been asked already, but do we know when Crossrail will appear on Traksy, OTT etc.?
Schedules are already in the open data, and hence are shown in OTT and RTT etc., albeit as they are unadvertised passenger services, they only appear in the "detailed" view on the latter.Not sure if this has been asked already, but do we know when Crossrail will appear on Traksy, OTT etc.?
I love the way Signalmaps shows the crossrail core and the movement of the trains.Crossrail is also on Signalmaps https://signalmaps.co.uk/#crossrail:755
Not sure if this has been asked already, but do we know when Crossrail will appear on Traksy, OTT etc.?
Train people yes but the general public will just call it the Elizabeth Line I reckon.People won’t call it the Elizabeth line, they’ll call it crossrail
Hopefully RTT puts the departures into the existing stations, will be a pain having to search crossrail specific at whitechapel for example.
I'd have thought that for Paddington and Liverpool Street at least it would make sense to integrate the two stations as some services may depart from the legacy platforms in peak hours and/or disruption.I don't think it will. The specific codes of PDX, LSX, FDX, WDX (Paddington, Liverpool St, Farringdon and Whitechapel respectively) all exist and are separate from the mainline stations. It will be very much a 5 minute frequency "turn-up-and-go" even from the 'reduced' Central section timetable though, so shouldn't be too much waiting (bar disruption).
I'd have thought that for Paddington and Liverpool Street at least it would make sense to integrate the two stations as some services may depart from the legacy platforms in peak hours and/or disruption.
Crossrail is also on Signalmaps https://signalmaps.co.uk/#crossrail:755
Schedules are already in the open data, and hence are shown in OTT and RTT etc., albeit as they are unadvertised passenger services, they only appear in the "detailed" view on the latter.
Traksy already shows the "core" (in fact there is a new Reading/Heathrow to Shenfield/Abbey Wood map!) but OTT's maps function only shows the connections at either end.
It's on CCF for a few weeks, TMIS for a while (both internal) and Trakys you can see it here - https://traksy.uk/live/M+63+PADTON
One thing I've already seen is how much of a backlog you can get at Abbey Wood with any sort of delays as 9Uxx services wait outside for one of the two platforms available.
I had a look earlier, and assumed it must have been a glitch with signalmaps missing data, because on the approach to Abbey Wood 9U15 had left a duplicate 9U15 a few blocks behind itself, which was only overwritten a few minutes later when 9U16 came along. The reversals at Abbey Wood seemed quite slick though.I love the way Signalmaps shows the crossrail core and the movement of the trains.
They will follow that model, just as the East London Line does on the common section (and indeed SWR does at Clapham Junction towards Waterloo). The underground has a timetable though, not just gaps.I feel like these trains should follow the tube model and have XX Mins to destination rather than the 17:10, 17:15 etc