• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Crossrail - Construction updates and progress towards opening (now expected 24 May 2022)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

ijmad

Established Member
Joined
7 Jan 2016
Messages
1,812
Location
UK
Or maybe not, I've not heard many call it the Vic or the Pic

I hear these shortenings all the time, personally speaking. Maybe it depends on the age group and social status of who you mix with the most!
 

thomalex

Member
Joined
25 Aug 2021
Messages
344
Location
Leeds
I'd say Crossrail is similar to RER A/B, but RER C is much more like Thameslink and RER D is more like the East London Line / Overground. Of course Paris has its own Overground network too, called Transilien, but the RER C and D with their lower branch frequency and more complex routes feels much more these than Crossrail.

I agree the 'mode' branding for the Elizabeth line is weird. I wonder what the plan will be if Crossrail 2 is ever brought back from mothballs. Will it be the same mode as Elizabeth Line or will we get yet another 'mode'?

A problem for the distant future no doubt but if Crossrail 2 does eventually happen you could bring back the Crossrail brand as the mode and have an Elizabeth line and this line (Charles line anyone?) under it.

I still think however the Elizabeth line will be subsumed under the Underground banner eventually though.
 

MotCO

Established Member
Joined
25 Aug 2014
Messages
4,155
The problem with 'The Victoria Line' is that it can refer to the tube line or the main line trains running into Victoria (as opposed to the London Bridge lines etc.)
 

mrmartin

Member
Joined
17 Dec 2012
Messages
1,018

Wolfie

Established Member
Joined
17 Aug 2010
Messages
6,232
I hear these shortenings all the time, personally speaking. Maybe it depends on the age group and social status of who you mix with the most!
Not to mention where you live. Those furthest from London, who say it once in a blue moon, seem keenest on the full long form.

The problem with 'The Victoria Line' is that it can refer to the tube line or the main line trains running into Victoria (as opposed to the London Bridge lines etc.)
Not to people living in London!
 

ctom_s

Member
Joined
23 Dec 2015
Messages
92
Location
Hornchurch, Essex
I think most who've been in london will call it crossrail for starters (like the way people still called thameslink thameslink even when it wasn't branded as such), maybe the elizabeth line will catch on eventually and people from outside london will call it that.

As for shortenings I don't know....I don't know of many other lines that a regularly shortened. Picc Line, Vic Line maybe that's about it. Liz line doesn't sound right haha.
 
Last edited:

dosxuk

Established Member
Joined
2 Jan 2011
Messages
1,789
As for shortenings I don't know....I don't know of many other lines that a regularly shortened. Picc Line, Vic Line maybe that's about it. Liz line doesn't sound right haha.

Baker Street & Waterloo Railway? A shortening so popular it was formally adopted.

More seriously, the Metropolitan line is regularly shortened to the Met. I don't think I've ever heard anyone read out "Hammersmith & City Line" either - although, bizarrely, I can't think what they use instead - probably "not the circle line, the other one" or "the pink line".
 

davetheguard

Established Member
Joined
10 Apr 2013
Messages
1,812
Baker Street & Waterloo Railway? A shortening so popular it was formally adopted.

More seriously, the Metropolitan line is regularly shortened to the Met. I don't think I've ever heard anyone read out "Hammersmith & City Line" either - although, bizarrely, I can't think what they use instead - probably "not the circle line, the other one" or "the pink line".

Someone I used to know always called it the "hot & cold" (H&C), which I tend to use myself now. I doubt that it's called that in common usage though.

Perhaps it should be!

I can't see myself using Johnson's pet name for Crossrail though. I wonder what that late name change cost the ratepayers of London? Luckily, I'm not one of them.
 

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
7,667
Location
London
People won’t call it the Elizabeth line, they’ll call it crossrail

Probably will call it whatever the media, signage, announcements, society call it. That being said you ask 10 people in London what the "London Overground" is called, and you'll get a bunch of different answers. Crossrail does seem to be what the general public now it as, or "TfL" for railway folk.

I've thought the Elizabeth line is always weird because it isn't a Tube line and it has more in common with Thameslink / Overground which are both not called a "XXX line", whilst the latter still has a distnictive TfL brand. Crossrail could have fit neatly into that (with the potential of Crossrail 2/3/4 in future, similar to RER in Paris).
 

GC class B1

Member
Joined
19 Jun 2021
Messages
448
Location
East midlands
Baker Street & Waterloo Railway? A shortening so popular it was formally adopted.

More seriously, the Metropolitan line is regularly shortened to the Met. I don't think I've ever heard anyone read out "Hammersmith & City Line" either - although, bizarrely, I can't think what they use instead - probably "not the circle line, the other one" or "the pink line".
Isn’t it known as the H&C?
 

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
7,667
Location
London
I can't see myself using Johnson's pet name for Crossrail though. I wonder what that late name change cost the ratepayers of London? Luckily, I'm not one of them.

Most of the signage hadn't been created by then, so I doubt it would have been any substantial cost.
 

43066

Established Member
Joined
24 Nov 2019
Messages
9,580
Location
London
Not sure if this has been asked already, but do we know when Crossrail will appear on Traksy, OTT etc.?
 

Watershed

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
26 Sep 2020
Messages
12,195
Location
UK
Not sure if this has been asked already, but do we know when Crossrail will appear on Traksy, OTT etc.?
Schedules are already in the open data, and hence are shown in OTT and RTT etc., albeit as they are unadvertised passenger services, they only appear in the "detailed" view on the latter.

Traksy already shows the "core" (in fact there is a new Reading/Heathrow to Shenfield/Abbey Wood map!) but OTT's maps function only shows the connections at either end.
 

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
7,667
Location
London
Not sure if this has been asked already, but do we know when Crossrail will appear on Traksy, OTT etc.?

It's on CCF for a few weeks, TMIS for a while (both internal) and Trakys you can see it here - https://traksy.uk/live/M+63+PADTON

One thing I've already seen is how much of a backlog you can get at Abbey Wood with any sort of delays as 9Uxx services wait outside for one of the two platforms available.
 

theking

Member
Joined
30 Sep 2011
Messages
626
Hopefully RTT puts the departures into the existing stations, will be a pain having to search crossrail specific at whitechapel for example.
 

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
7,667
Location
London
Hopefully RTT puts the departures into the existing stations, will be a pain having to search crossrail specific at whitechapel for example.

I don't think it will. The specific codes of PDX, LSX, FDX, WDX (Paddington, Liverpool St, Farringdon and Whitechapel respectively) all exist and are separate from the mainline stations. It will be very much a 5 minute frequency "turn-up-and-go" even from the 'reduced' Central section timetable though, so shouldn't be too much waiting (bar disruption).
 
Joined
20 Aug 2018
Messages
57
Location
Sussex
I don't think it will. The specific codes of PDX, LSX, FDX, WDX (Paddington, Liverpool St, Farringdon and Whitechapel respectively) all exist and are separate from the mainline stations. It will be very much a 5 minute frequency "turn-up-and-go" even from the 'reduced' Central section timetable though, so shouldn't be too much waiting (bar disruption).
I'd have thought that for Paddington and Liverpool Street at least it would make sense to integrate the two stations as some services may depart from the legacy platforms in peak hours and/or disruption.
 

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
7,667
Location
London
I'd have thought that for Paddington and Liverpool Street at least it would make sense to integrate the two stations as some services may depart from the legacy platforms in peak hours and/or disruption.

'Legacy platfoms' - making National Rail users feel old! Yeah there would certainly be some merit in that but would need to be done in a way that wouldn't confuse people. I know there are discussions about how to manage this on customer information screens when through running begins either later this year or 2023; one approach might be as is done at Kings Cross with the Thameslink service that now depart from St Pancras, but will be quite the shift for people to no longer see their purple trains on 10-12 at Paddington and 15-17 at Liverpool Street (with the exception of a very small number of peak trains).
 

43066

Established Member
Joined
24 Nov 2019
Messages
9,580
Location
London

Schedules are already in the open data, and hence are shown in OTT and RTT etc., albeit as they are unadvertised passenger services, they only appear in the "detailed" view on the latter.

Traksy already shows the "core" (in fact there is a new Reading/Heathrow to Shenfield/Abbey Wood map!) but OTT's maps function only shows the connections at either end.

It's on CCF for a few weeks, TMIS for a while (both internal) and Trakys you can see it here - https://traksy.uk/live/M+63+PADTON

One thing I've already seen is how much of a backlog you can get at Abbey Wood with any sort of delays as 9Uxx services wait outside for one of the two platforms available.


Thanks all. Not sure how I managed to miss that!
 

DC1989

Member
Joined
25 Mar 2022
Messages
500
Location
London
I feel like these trains should follow the tube model and have XX Mins to destination rather than the 17:10, 17:15 etc

In the central section these trains are going to be every 150 seconds - maybe even 120 seconds further down the line. Even minor delays will show everything thereafter as delayed?
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,528
I love the way Signalmaps shows the crossrail core and the movement of the trains.
I had a look earlier, and assumed it must have been a glitch with signalmaps missing data, because on the approach to Abbey Wood 9U15 had left a duplicate 9U15 a few blocks behind itself, which was only overwritten a few minutes later when 9U16 came along. The reversals at Abbey Wood seemed quite slick though.
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
18,967
I feel like these trains should follow the tube model and have XX Mins to destination rather than the 17:10, 17:15 etc
They will follow that model, just as the East London Line does on the common section (and indeed SWR does at Clapham Junction towards Waterloo). The underground has a timetable though, not just gaps.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top