I have seen some bizarre proposals from Peel Group over the years but this must be the best yet. .
I agree with the main thrust of your comments. Peel as a company has a PMA-OPM philosophy - Positive Mental Attitude about Other People's Money. This has always been apparent at Finningley. How long was the Great Yorkshire Way in gestation? Peel are shrewd operators who banked not only their ability to turn round the former RAF base blessed with a V-Bomber capable runway that can now support large commercial airport but also the flow of public funds into South Yorkshire to regenerate former mining settlements.Plausible promises of high technology jobs based at the airport were given. This was all good "castles in the air" stuff - the problem with such castles is that when you try to move in you will always fall through the floor.
Diverting the ECML is such as a castle - the additional stopping time allowing as well for acceleration and deceleration would pose significant constraints on all ECML operators. However IMHO this story is nothing more than a good example of Peel's ability to spin a good yarn for public funds..
Peel will have observed the success of Stobart's Southend Airport Station which involves a station built on an existing railway that happens to run past the airport's perimeter. (I appreciate that Southend's success also has been built on the basis of a lack of airport capacity in the south east). It should be possible to build something similar in scale, on or near the old Finningley Station sight - linked to airport terminal by a people carrier similar to that being installed between Luton Airport Parkway station and Luton Airport.
The problem comes on the southern and eastern approaches to Doncaster where the Joint Line merges with the ECML. A similar problem occurs at the south end of the route at Peterborough where proposals for a grade separated junction at Werrington are being put in place - similar to those recently executed at Norton Bridge on the WCML - which from my experience is working just as it says on the tin. A segregated junction at the south end of Doncaster is the next logical step in extending the rail freight route from Felixstowe - a process that began with the FTN project. Reliability on the ECML fast trains would be improved.
However north and east of Doncaster there are a number of rail routes formerly used by deceased coal trains that could provide alternative routes to Leeds which could if opened to passenger traffic provide the connectivity stimulus to West and South Yorkshire that is much vaunted but vaguely explained in the Northern Powerhouse think-tankery stuff.
This is how synergy can be created. Add together the costs of a new station at Finningley, a grade separated junction, and new stations/routes in West Yorkshire and then work out the benefits. Diverting the ECML is just blowing in the wind or rather blowing other people's money in the wind..
Last edited: