I'm old enough to remember when those headcodes were either pasted on boards attached to the lamp brackets of steam locos or in the front windows of diesel engines and dmus!
Then new designs incorporated headcode display boxes, but the decision was then taken not to display them and the boxes were blanked-out or the display permanently replaced with two white dots or something like OOOO.
I've often wondered why that decision was taken. Was it "too much information for the passenger?" or am I being paranoid?
As they are still obviously used internally, why can't they be publicly used again? For example, a XC train at Edinburgh simply stating "Plymouth" on the destination indicator is not much help if I'm wanting to go to Derby or Birmingham. And when trains are running out of course, you cannot always depend on PIS systems getting it right!
AFAIK EC is the only company which acknowledges and displays the codes in their timetables. Why are they not more widely used publicly as an additional means of identifying a train?
Then new designs incorporated headcode display boxes, but the decision was then taken not to display them and the boxes were blanked-out or the display permanently replaced with two white dots or something like OOOO.
I've often wondered why that decision was taken. Was it "too much information for the passenger?" or am I being paranoid?
As they are still obviously used internally, why can't they be publicly used again? For example, a XC train at Edinburgh simply stating "Plymouth" on the destination indicator is not much help if I'm wanting to go to Derby or Birmingham. And when trains are running out of course, you cannot always depend on PIS systems getting it right!
AFAIK EC is the only company which acknowledges and displays the codes in their timetables. Why are they not more widely used publicly as an additional means of identifying a train?