• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Engineering train derailment at Penrith

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

ModernRailways

Established Member
Joined
21 Apr 2011
Messages
2,112
I don't know how fast they hit each other, but I know I'd rather not be at the sharp end when it happened

Farcebook says it was at 45mph, but my DB friend told me it was around 15mph. If it was 45mph I imagine it would be a lot bigger news and there would be quite a mess which wouldn't just take 24 hours to clear up - I imagine that 24 hours will also include finishing the engineering works that were already going on. I also imagine the driver who jumped out would have had more than a broken leg.
 

MadCommuter

Member
Joined
4 Oct 2010
Messages
653
Sorry i do not remember the headcodes well. What is going on? ALl sleepers cancelled or some via ECML?

Only the portions north of Edinburgh running, ie Inverness, Aberdeen & Fort Bill in both directions. The lowland sleepers all cancelled.
 

EltonRoad

Member
Joined
2 Jun 2009
Messages
1,029
Location
Kendal
Portions from Fort William, Aberdeen, Inverness terminate at Edinburgh, and return in the morning.

Glasgow and Edinburgh southbound trains cancelled and berths remain in station for passenger use.

Both northbound trains from Euston cancelled and berths remain in station for passenger use.

Luxury coaches laid on for passengers wishing to travel.

That's my reading from ScotRail web site anyway.
 

Crossover

Established Member
Joined
4 Jun 2009
Messages
9,386
Location
Yorkshire
Everything for tomorrow to and from Glasgow/Edinburgh VT has been entered onto the system as a Carlisle shuttle. Same for TPE. I wonder if TPE have a 350 stuck up North now
 

SPADTrap

Established Member
Joined
15 Oct 2012
Messages
2,353
The possessions on the south of the ECML are from Alexandra Palace to Stevenage so everything is going via Hertford. So that may have added further headaches along with the possessions further north as mentioned earlier.
 

ModernRailways

Established Member
Joined
21 Apr 2011
Messages
2,112
Do the sleeper drivers sign Hertford?

Their is single line working between Durham and Northallerton so it's entirely possible they could have gone through there, but Hertford may be where they decided they couldn't go.
 

tcm1106

Member
Joined
4 Jan 2010
Messages
272
Location
UK
Front bogie of the loco has derailed and the wagon behind it is in the dirt. Nothing derailed on the train in front but the rear wagons have buffer locked.

The lowland sleeper was due to run but crossed communications led to DBS sending the relief driver at Crewe home. Therefore now cancelled as well.
 

RichmondCommu

Established Member
Joined
23 Feb 2010
Messages
6,906
Location
Richmond, London
Where did you hear that?

What happened to the LOL?
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Now waiting for Mr Crow to pop up out of the woodwork to give his opinion

And why shouldn't he? By all accounts things could have been a lot worse.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
I wonder if VT could divert over the S&C tomorrow?
It would save people having to get the bus part way.

I guess it will all depend on having enough loco's to do the drags. Those signal boxes could be very places later on today!
 

Carlisle

Established Member
Joined
26 Aug 2012
Messages
4,313
If there are any diversions it'll probably only be Voyager services that are diverted.

Hope the driver involved makes a speedy recovery .I can recall only one VT diversion a day each way via the S&C when the line was closed for about 2 or so weeks during the grayrigg accident so for various reasons it appears the system is not geared up to regular weekday diversions on this route, coaches always seem very much the preferred option
 
Last edited:

amcluesent

Member
Joined
19 Dec 2010
Messages
877
Lessons need to be learned, 1000s have had travel plans disrupted.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
17,783
Location
East Anglia
14.00 is now the possible re-opening time. At such short notice the S&C and planning that needs to go into it rules it out really. Also ties the Voyagers up for too long. Best stick to a frequent train-bus-train shuttle.
 

Tomnick

Established Member
Joined
10 Jun 2005
Messages
5,882
Lessons need to be learned, 1000s have had travel plans disrupted.
Lessons are always learnt from incidents such as this. Hopefully it'll be in the name of safety rather than convenience though...
 

shx

Member
Joined
7 Jan 2014
Messages
20
I'm surprised to see Scotrail opening their Sleepers for passengers to kip in. Why not via ECML?
They told us, that ScotRail has no drivers allowed to go via ECML available. Pretty chaotic yesterday, till 10pm nobody (at least in Euston) really knew what's going on. At least I haven't seen (or heard the announcement for) the coaches ScotRail's website promised, passengers who stayed were diverted on ECML daytrains.
 

dave59

Member
Joined
28 Jul 2010
Messages
123
Hope the driver involved makes a speedy recovery .I can recall only one VT diversion a day each way via the S&C when the line was closed for about 2 or so weeks during the grayrigg accident so for various reasons it appears the system is not geared up to regular weekday diversions on this route, coaches always seem very much the preferred option

Rightly so. Unless NR improve the transit times (2 hours and 41 minutes) on the diversionary route it remains rather useless for passenger trains other than perhaps the sleepers.
 

TDK

Established Member
Joined
19 Apr 2008
Messages
4,164
Location
Crewe
It is good that some of you have gladly aired your concerns about the driver but it does make my blood boil when many of you are only concerned on the loco numbers, if there are diversions so you can get haulage and also possibly getting photos of trains on diversion. It now seems clearer why some rail staff do not like some spotters. I hope the drivers are OK and I don't give a monkeys about anything else
 

RichmondCommu

Established Member
Joined
23 Feb 2010
Messages
6,906
Location
Richmond, London
It is good that some of you have gladly aired your concerns about the driver but it does make my blood boil when many of you are only concerned on the loco numbers, if there are diversions so you can get haulage and also possibly getting photos of trains on diversion. It now seems clearer why some rail staff do not like some spotters. I hope the drivers are OK and I don't give a monkeys about anything else

Post number three initially described the incident as a LOL moment. It beggars belief how anyone can think like that, especially given that the comment was made by a fellow driver.
 

Rugd1022

Member
Joined
19 Feb 2010
Messages
565
Location
Rugby
I'm not usually one to speculate when accidents occur on the railway but as someone who is very used to working engineering trains within possessions I can say that collisions like this are rare and usually happen at slow speed. Trains are often propelled within a work site (with radio communication between driver and engineering supervisor) as well as driven from the leading cab so there are a number of ways it could have happened.

Best wishes to the drivers involved.
 

Dolive22

Member
Joined
20 Dec 2009
Messages
463
As of 11:02 Virgin now say disruption till 1 pm.

I hope the driver with the suspected broken leg recovers well. Do we know about the other driver?
 

ModernRailways

Established Member
Joined
21 Apr 2011
Messages
2,112
It is good that some of you have gladly aired your concerns about the driver but it does make my blood boil when many of you are only concerned on the loco numbers, if there are diversions so you can get haulage and also possibly getting photos of trains on diversion. It now seems clearer why some rail staff do not like some spotters. I hope the drivers are OK and I don't give a monkeys about anything else

I only posted the numbers of the locos involved as I wasn't sure of the headcodes, some people can find out the headcode by using the loco numbers. I personally couldn't give a crap about the numbers or the headcode, to me it was just two freight trains collided.

A fellow driver posted:

LOL Where did you hear that?

He's since removed the LOL part...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top