• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Face coverings compulsory on public transport in England from 15 June

Status
Not open for further replies.

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
28,963
Location
Redcar
We're wandering around a bit all over the place at the moment. Let's focus on face coverings on public transport please going forward. There are plenty of other threads to discuss wider aspects of the current situation (and if there are not then the Forum has more than sufficient capacity to host additional threads as needed!).

Thanks :)
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

43066

On Moderation
Joined
24 Nov 2019
Messages
11,532
Location
London
My observations this morning have confirmed my suspicion that the requirement to wear face coverings is an unenforceable, complete and utter joke of a policy.

I would say 80-90% of people I’ve encountered on the railway so far today are wearing some form of face covering. Many are wearing their masks around their necks, many are wearing them covering mouths only, with their noses uncovered.

A significant minority are not bothering at all (no comment on which group I fall into!).
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
41,316
Location
Yorks
My observations this morning have confirmed my suspicion that the requirement to wear face coverings is an unenforceable, complete and utter joke of a policy.

I would say 80-90% of people I’ve encountered on the railway so far today are wearing some form of face covering. Many are wearing their masks around their necks, many are wearing them covering mouths only, with their noses uncovered.

A significant minority are not bothering at all (no comment on which group I fall into!).

80 - 90% seems like a fairly good uptake to me.

Were many of those wearing them around their necks doing so on stations, rather than on trains.
 

MattA7

Member
Joined
27 Jan 2019
Messages
473
I wonder if the engineer needs to wear a mask/face covering as he is safely locked away in his cabin for security reasons anyway (at least on ScotRail trains anyway however I imagine most have the same security measures)
 

43066

On Moderation
Joined
24 Nov 2019
Messages
11,532
Location
London
80 - 90% seems like a fairly good uptake to me.

Were many of those wearing them around their necks doing so on stations, rather than on trains.

More on the stations than on the trains - but quite a few on board trains, too!

I note that BTP are not wearing masks at all - no idea whether this is down to a deliberate policy.

I wonder if the engineer needs to wear a mask/face covering as he is safely locked away in his cabin for security reasons anyway (at least on ScotRail trains anyway however I imagine most have the same security measures)

If by engineer you mean driver, no, they are not required to wear masks while driving.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
41,316
Location
Yorks
More on the stations than on the trains - but quite a few on board trains, too!

I note that BTP are not wearing masks at all - no idea whether this is down to a deliberate policy.

I can fully understand people not wearing them on open platforms as there is no logic to it, but it still seems that many are making the effort on the trains by the sound of it.
 

westv

Established Member
Joined
29 Mar 2013
Messages
4,356
:D
I wonder if the engineer needs to wear a mask/face covering as he is safely locked away in his cabin for security reasons anyway (at least on ScotRail trains anyway however I imagine most have the same security measures)
Engineer? This isn't the USA.:D:D
 

NorthOxonian

Established Member
Associate Staff
Buses & Coaches
Joined
5 Jul 2018
Messages
1,527
Location
Oxford/Newcastle
I walked down to the shops for the first time in the post-mask era and noticed a couple of things as I went past the bus station.

The first was that most of the buses seemed about as busy as they were this time last week, possibly even slightly quiter. Given demand has increased for travel, with retail workers travelling in and busier high streets, the fact usage is at best constant is not a good sign. Where are all the people who claimed in surveys that they'd use the bus if mask wearing was enforced?

The other noticeable change is a massive increase in litter - a lot of people throwing disposable masks away once they leave the bus station. I'm surprised there hasn't been more statements against littering by bus companies or the government - it does seem to be a growing problem, especially around here.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
41,316
Location
Yorks
I walked down to the shops for the first time in the post-mask era and noticed a couple of things as I went past the bus station.

The first was that most of the buses seemed about as busy as they were this time last week, possibly even slightly quiter. Given demand has increased for travel, with retail workers travelling in and busier high streets, the fact usage is at best constant is not a good sign. Where are all the people who claimed in surveys that they'd use the bus if mask wearing was enforced?

The other noticeable change is a massive increase in litter - a lot of people throwing disposable masks away once they leave the bus station. I'm surprised there hasn't been more statements against littering by bus companies or the government - it does seem to be a growing problem, especially around here.

Litter is something that will need to be addressed.

Perhaps a relaunch of the "Keep Britain Tidy" campaign.
 
Last edited:

Skymonster

Established Member
Joined
7 Feb 2012
Messages
1,994
I note that BTP are not wearing masks at all - no idea whether this is down to a deliberate policy.
Law enforcement is exempt according to the legislation. Really though, I think they should be showing a good example and wearing them.
 

MattA7

Member
Joined
27 Jan 2019
Messages
473
Law enforcement is exempt according to the legislation. Really though, I think they should be showing a good example and wearing them.

But they won’t as The government has always had the “don’t do as I do,do as I say” attitude and probably always will
 

Butts

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Jan 2011
Messages
11,576
Location
Stirlingshire
Law enforcement is exempt according to the legislation. Really though, I think they should be showing a good example and wearing them.

Ironically I saw a couple of BTP officers wearing them at Haymarket Station in Edinburgh the other day.
 

Mag_seven

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
1 Sep 2014
Messages
10,789
Location
here to eternity
The "White Collar" TSSA union apparently still don't want the "wider public" to use the rail network despite the requirement to wear face coverings:


TSSA General Secretary, Manuel Cortes, has warned that the compulsory use of face coverings on public transport in England from today (Monday 15th June) must "not be seen as a green light" for wider use of public transport or the ditching of social distancing measures.

Commenting, Cortes said: “The changes in the rules are welcome as they are likely to lower transmission of the virus on the transport network. However, this must not be seen as a green light among the wider population to use public transport.

“It must remain the case that only the key workers who are keeping us safe during the pandemic continue to use public transport.

This seems a perverse view for a union that's supposedly concerned about its members long term job prospects and wants increased public transport usage to take.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
41,316
Location
Yorks
The "White Collar" TSSA union apparently still don't want the "wider public" to use the rail network despite the requirement to wear face coverings:






This seems a perverse view for a union that's supposedly concerned about its members long term job prospects and wants increased public transport usage to take.

What a clueless wonder.

Passengers won't forget the betrayal by these Unions in a hurry.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
41,316
Location
Yorks
50p says that the majority won't hear about and those that do will forget about it within a few weeks.

Perhaps that's just me. But as someone who has shrugged my shoulders and got on with things during various strikes because I agree generally with a unionised workforce, I find this attitude to passengers disgusting.

It also assumes that there are any passengers actually left on the railway after all of this.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
103,885
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
This seems a perverse view for a union that's supposedly concerned about its members long term job prospects and wants increased public transport usage to take.

I can't help but take the view that the Government needs to be just a bit more Tory about this and tell them (and no doubt the RMT) to get lost.

And that if they don't, along will come the "Coronavirus (Prohibition of Industrial Action) Regulations 2020".
 

Trackman

Established Member
Joined
28 Feb 2013
Messages
3,565
Location
Lewisham
I walked down to the shops for the first time in the post-mask era and noticed a couple of things as I went past the bus station.

The first was that most of the buses seemed about as busy as they were this time last week, possibly even slightly quiter. Given demand has increased for travel, with retail workers travelling in and busier high streets, the fact usage is at best constant is not a good sign. Where are all the people who claimed in surveys that they'd use the bus if mask wearing was enforced?

Funny that, I think the buses have been quieter since masks have been introduced- I excepted it to be busier with shops opening etc as you say.
Seen a few buses on a busy route today carrying around fresh air.
 

island

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2010
Messages
17,343
Location
0036
When the French Government does, as it's just following French law as a French company which operates to and through France.
Eurostar International Ltd. is a British company incorporated in Britain with a British CEO, CFO, and Strategic Director and a head office in Britain.
 

Journeyman

Established Member
Joined
16 Apr 2014
Messages
6,295
The "White Collar" TSSA union apparently still don't want the "wider public" to use the rail network despite the requirement to wear face coverings.

This seems a perverse view for a union that's supposedly concerned about its members long term job prospects and wants increased public transport usage to take.

I knew this would happen. It's utterly, utterly stupid.
 

alex397

Established Member
Joined
6 Oct 2017
Messages
1,739
Location
UK
Funny that, I think the buses have been quieter since masks have been introduced- I excepted it to be busier with shops opening etc as you say.
Seen a few buses on a busy route today carrying around fresh air.

This is just from my observations so obviously not completely accurate, but in my area (east Kent), buses appear to be slightly busier this week. Certainly still quiet and not sustainable in the long term for commercial operations, but certainly busier even with the face covering rule.

On one of the usually busy inter-urban routes on a 15-min frequency, most buses have a handful (appx 5 passengers), whereas in past weeks were largely carrying fresh air (and at a lower frequency).

Keeping on topic, most passengers are wearing masks, but quite a few taking them off when sitting down!
 

MikeWM

Established Member
Joined
26 Mar 2010
Messages
4,610
Location
Ely
Perhaps that's just me. But as someone who has shrugged my shoulders and got on with things during various strikes because I agree generally with a unionised workforce, I find this attitude to passengers disgusting.

It's not just you - I agree entirely.

The only quasi-logical reason to introduce masks was to coax an increase in passenger numbers (whether that actually works, or has the opposite effect, is a different matter!)
 

Journeyman

Established Member
Joined
16 Apr 2014
Messages
6,295
The only quasi-logical reason to introduce masks was to coax an increase in passenger numbers (whether that actually works, or has the opposite effect, is a different matter!)

Yeah, it's meant to "reassure" people, but just massively freaks me out instead. I don't currently have to use public transport in England, but when work picks up again, I will. I'm very tempted to claim a mental health exemption.
 

Jonny

Established Member
Joined
10 Feb 2011
Messages
2,573
Yeah, it's meant to "reassure" people, but just massively freaks me out instead. I don't currently have to use public transport in England, but when work picks up again, I will. I'm very tempted to claim a mental health exemption.

Same for me - as I fit the disability criteria. I don't even need to fall back on self-identification.
 

Killingworth

Established Member
Joined
30 May 2018
Messages
5,652
Location
Sheffield
It's been very effective. I saw a train take 2 psssengers aboard today, not related, bringing the total number carried to 8 (all masked), in 4 coaches. That's the highest number I've seen on a Northern train since March. But that's rather a lot of fresh air to be carted around by a crew of two! Zero in carriage 1, 1 in carriage 2, 2 in carriage 3 and 4 in the last crowded carriage.

It will be months before space comes under serious pressure hereabouts, but at least masks are being worn.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top