• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

FirstGroup Aquire RATP London

Volvodart

Established Member
Joined
12 Jun 2010
Messages
2,653
There is more information available in the presentation press release


Operational and financial overview
RATP London was formed through the consolidation of London United, London Sovereign and London Transit bus companies.

RATP London is most prominent in West London, and also operates in the north-west and south-west of the capital. RATP London has c.3,700 employees and operates a fleet of c.1,000 buses out of four owned and six leased depots, as well as a number of smaller ancillary properties, in Central and West London. The four freehold depots have existing use value of c.£50m. The freehold depots are located in Fulwell, Hounslow, Shepherds Bush and Stamford Brook, with leasehold depots in Edgware, Harrow, Hounslow, Park Royal, Tolworth and Westbourne Park.
The majority of the senior management team joined the company over the last three years and have developed and implemented a comprehensive turnaround plan for the business. Good progress has been made since the implementation of the plan, both in enhanced bid discipline with c.30 routes rebid over the past two years, including the early termination of loss making routes at contract review dates as well as improved operational performance and cost control, and workforce stabilisation. This improvement in performance can be seen in the TfL Q2 FY 2025 Bus Operator League Tables, with the three subsidiaries occupying first, second and fourth place in the league table for “operated mileage before non-deductible losses”.
RATP London operates c.90 routes on behalf of TfL. These route contracts typically have a seven year maturity with on average, c.13 contracts in the portfolio renewed each year. As the route contract portfolio evolves over the next five years, the Group anticipates that annual revenues will grow to £300-350m, with operating margins in line with historical norms in London of c.6-7%.
RATP London reported group revenues of £271m for the year ended 31 December 2023. The Group anticipates that the Acquisition will be broadly earnings neutral in FY 2025 and FY 2026, after the utilisation of onerous contract provisions of c.£40-50m that recognise contracts entered into prior to 2022 and were subsequently impacted by material labour market cost increases. The Group will recognise these provisions on acquisition. The onerous contract loss provision release matches the losses being incurred on these contracts and will result in a broadly neutral impact in the Group’s profit and loss accounts.
Buses are currently acquired under operating leases, which the Group will review going forward. The Group anticipates aggregate capital expenditure of c.£40-50m which excludes bus acquisitions, over the first three years of ownership relating primarily to depot electrification, charging infrastructure, existing fleet replacement batteries, and a small amount of spending on other non-current assets. The capex forecast excludes the buses that may be acquired under operating leases and this will be reviewed in the context of the Group’s wider approach to electrification.
TfL is targeting an entirely zero-emission bus fleet by 2034 at the latest and electrification is now compulsory in the bidding process. RATP London has been an early mover in bus fleet and infrastructure electrification, with a third of the fleet electric.
The Group will seek to capitalise on electrification expenditure efficiencies through its existing capabilities and arrangements. The Group anticipates operating cash outflows of c. £30m after bus operating lease payments and capex, in the first two years of ownership, with the business expected to be operating cash generative from FY 2027 onwards.
Looking ahead, in addition to the measures included in the current turnaround plan, the Group has identified a number of synergies that could further enhance profitability. These include fuel and electricity pricing, insurance, on bus advertising, materials contracts, fleet purchasing, vehicle sale benefits through the use of the Group’s Ensignbus business, and through the merging of some back-office functions. The Group will also consider the future financing of electric buses, including the potential benefits of bringing electric bus batteries into its joint venture with Hitachi Zero Carbon.
Impact on the Group’s FY 2025 and FY 2026 financial outlook
FirstGroup plc 3 Should the Acquisition complete in the fourth quarter of the Group’s financial year ending March 2025, it is anticipated that its FY 2025 net capital expenditure will be c.£125m and year-end adjusted net debt will be c.£110m. The Group will also recognise additional IFRS16 lease liabilities of c.£60m in FY 2025.
In FY 2026, RATP London is anticipated to make a small contribution to the First Bus adjusted operating profit, at a lower margin, and the Group’s net capital expenditure is expected to increase to c.£125m, with the majority of expenditure in First Bus electrification. There will be an increase in the Group’s interest cost of c.£6m, including IFRS 16, relating to the Acquisition, and the Group’s FY 2026 year-end Adjusted net debt is expected to be c.£130m. Share Purchase Agreement terms
Under the terms of the Share Purchase Agreement (‘SPA’), FirstGroup plc will acquire, through its whollyowned subsidiary, First Bus Holdings Limited (‘First Bus’), the entire issued share capital of RATP Dev Transit London Ltd and its three operating subsidiaries, London Transit Limited, London Sovereign Limited and London United Busways Limited, from RATP Dev UK Ltd (the ‘Seller’), a wholly-owned subsidiary of RATP Dev. The consideration will be paid in full on completion, subject to a normal post-completion true-up process. The entire debt of RATP London will be assumed or repaid by the Seller’s group prior to completion, apart from the debt relating to hire purchase and lease finance obligations (projected to be c.£45m as at 31 December 2024) which are expected to remain with RATP London at completion.
The Group has provided a parent company guarantee to underpin the obligations of First Bus under the SPA, and similarly the Seller’s parent, RATP Dev, guarantees the obligations of the Seller. The SPA includes a customary suite of warranties and indemnities, subject to caps and limitations as appropriate.
The Seller is required to carry on operating and funding the business in line with past practice in the period to completion. A limited suite of transitional services will continue to be provided by the Seller and its group for a short period post-completion under the terms of a Transitional Services Agreement (‘TSA’). Satisfaction of the conditions is subject to a longstop date of 30 April 2025. The current management team will transfer with the business and are expected to be retained post-acquisition.
London bus market1
London is a £2.1bn bus market, accounting for around 46% of the entire UK bus market. There are c.9,000 buses in London, with the market primarily served by six major operators.
Bus patronage is expected to continue to recover back to pre-Covid levels, supported by modest population growth across London, further growth in tourist volumes, continued declines in car utilisation and investment in the expansion of the bus network. TfL’s Business Plan expects bus patronage to grow at c.4% per annum between 2025 and 2027, recovering fully to pre-Covid levels by 2027.
Looking at modal share, despite a slight shift towards the London Underground and more recently, suburban rail networks, bus remains the primary mode of transport within London, with an average of 192 journeys per capita in 2023 (accounting for >50% of all journeys made).
The size of the London bus network has also been resilient, with a broadly stable number of network miles operated between 2012 and 2020, and only a very modest decline between 2020 and 2024. This reflects the consistent levels of funding allocated to support operators, with long-term funding growth of c.3% per annum between 2004 and 2023 demonstrating TfL’s commitment to bus. In 2023 Bus accounted for approximately 25% of total TfL operating expenditure (equivalent to £2.1bn per annum).
Overview of TfL contracts
London bus operations are entirely regulated by TfL, with each individual route forming a contract which is bid for by authorised private sector operators. TfL decide the contract specifications for a given bus route, control ticket prices and collects passenger revenue. Operators own the buses and depots, and source and pay drivers to run routes. The proximity of the line of route to the operator’s depot and staff changeover facilities is therefore key to maximising efficiency and being competitive on bid price.
Individual route contracts are tendered competitively by TfL, generally over seven-year terms, resulting in a franchising model where there is minimal risk of losing large parts of the business at one time, and with a view to full decarbonisation of the fleet.
The route contracts bear no revenue risk on the base price bid. Inflation is allowed for based on 85% of revenue against which CPI is applied, and TfL assuming 15% of bus operator cost base does not inflate.
TfL is entitled to make deductions for lost mileage (at a specified rate per mile) where caused by reasons within the operator’s reasonable control (such as missing drivers or mechanical breakdown), and fares payment irregularities (i.e. underpayment by passengers). Operators are not penalised for lost mileage that is not within their control, for example traffic or roadworks delays.
In addition, operator performance is measured and incentivised / penalised through quality of service indicators within the contracts, known as Quality of Service Indicators (‘QSIs’). Under the QSI regime, bonus payments and liquidated damages are based on the operator’s performance against a defined minimum performance standard of Excess Wait Times (‘EWT’) or a minimum percentage of “On-Time” services. Bonuses are earned up to an annual maximum 15% of contract payments (less any deductions for lost mileage) (the ‘Contract Sum’) for good performance, with liquidated damages for poor performance capped annually at 10% of the Contract Sum. 1Source: TfL data
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

YorkRailFan

Established Member
Joined
6 Sep 2023
Messages
1,984
Location
York
Wow, was not expecting First to be back operating TFL routes in 2024. Certainly came as a surprise to me.
 

K4016td

Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
104
Location
Slough
Chance for Slough operations to become well managed again. The decline started when they sold off London and transferred management to Hampshire.
 

-Colly405-

Member
Joined
25 May 2018
Messages
735
Location
Stoke Gifford
Original Tour/Tootbus and Bath Bus Co can't be far behind. They would both fit nicely into First operations.
RouteOne reports
Following closure of the deal, RATP Dev will focus its resources on urban rail globally, Deputy CEO and member of the Executive Board Mehdi Sinaceur says.
So, yeah!
 

Flange Squeal

Established Member
Joined
17 Jul 2012
Messages
1,514
Original Tour/Tootbus and Bath Bus Co can't be far behind. They would both fit nicely into First operations.
I wonder if it could relate to why Tootbus have dropped the affiliation with City Sightseeing in Bath? I’d wondered if they had just decided to focus on their own brand and decided paying a cut of income to City Sightseeing was not worthwhile anymore, but maybe it’s to make acquiring the brand more attractive to prospective buyers such as First as it appears more unified in multiple locations (London and Bath)?
 

Snow1964

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2019
Messages
8,063
Location
West Wiltshire
My reaction after they sold London 10 years ago. Do RATP have any old First depots?
Atlas Road was opened as overflow for Westbourne Park when part of it was closed during construction of Elizabeth Line.

RATP had another smaller depot (Park Royal) other end of Atlas Road (which they inherited from NCP challenger), which was closed when they moved into the big depot that is now in use.

The ex First, Tower Transit depot at Lea Interchange (which RATP had big stake in) was sold off to Stagecoach couple of years ago
 

Deerfold

Veteran Member
Joined
26 Nov 2009
Messages
13,128
Location
Yorkshire
Wow, was not expecting First to be back operating TFL routes in 2024. Certainly came as a surprise to me.
They won't. It's anticipated to be April 2025.

Chance for Slough operations to become well managed again. The decline started when they sold off London and transferred management to Hampshire.
As a passenger in Slough when their buses were managed from London, the local company was well into its decline then with routes and hours of operation being regularly trimmed.
 

Goldfish62

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
11,663
As a passenger in Slough when their buses were managed from London, the local company was well into its decline then with routes and hours of operation being regularly trimmed.
That was pretty much summed up First country-wide back then.

The London senior management did let the local team largely get on with things. Moving to Southampton-based management hastened the decline.
 

Whiteway215

Established Member
Joined
15 Sep 2015
Messages
2,053
Location
Bath
Will history repeat itself where dual door vehicles redundant from London because of their age be cascaded to FirstBus fleets outside the capital?
 

Flange Squeal

Established Member
Joined
17 Jul 2012
Messages
1,514
Will history repeat itself where dual door vehicles redundant from London because of their age be cascaded to FirstBus fleets outside the capital?
And/or become a source of vehicles for single door conversion and upseating that can then be sold on through their Ensign dealership?
 

F Great Eastern

Established Member
Joined
2 Apr 2009
Messages
3,669
Location
East Anglia
Am I cynical or is First buying up these operations such as in London and these coach operations, because they know that changes to the bus market in the rest of the country with the new government are likely to make that business less lucrative?
 

Goldfish62

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
11,663
Am I cynical or is First buying up these operations such as in London and these coach operations, because they know that changes to the bus market in the rest of the country with the new government are likely to make that business less lucrative?
That's not cynical at all. Seems pretty obvious that's why they're doing it. If you consider the winner-takes-all area franchising system adopted by TfGM and probably inevitably by most if not all other local authorities London presents a lower risk, which is highlighted in First's statement:

TfL, generally over seven-year terms, resulting in a franchising model where there is minimal risk of losing large parts of the business at one time
 

greenline712

Member
Joined
2 Oct 2023
Messages
262
Location
Inside the M25
Am I cynical or is First buying up these operations such as in London and these coach operations, because they know that changes to the bus market in the rest of the country with the new government are likely to make that business less lucrative?
There is no magic money tree in London operations nowadays .... the financial returns on route contracts are at an average of 4-5% now. There may be higher margins at the start of a contract, but over a 5 / 7 year life .... just witness the mid-term surrendering of many contracts over the last few years ....

However, balance that against the lack of risk .... if operators get their costs correct, then the income stream can be guaranteed, which is good business.

I do agree that First are moving back into London to spread their income base .... how things change in 12 years !!!
 

Goldfish62

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
11,663
There is no magic money tree in London operations nowadays .... the financial returns on route contracts are at an average of 4-5% now. There may be higher margins at the start of a contract, but over a 5 / 7 year life .... just witness the mid-term surrendering of many contracts over the last few years ....
4-5% is a perfectly appropriate margin for such work (I refer to a certain P Hendy's response, back in the day but still relevant today, to Messrs Souter and Lockhead's insistence on their businesses returning 15%+ margins).

Contracts have been surrendered at the break point not because they're making 4-5%, but because they've been making substantial losses.
 

GCH100

Member
Joined
2 Jul 2019
Messages
166
I can see why RATP have sold it, as it was making big losses, I believe, FirstGroup now need to straighten it out financially. Not suprised FirstGroup have gone back into London as the managers who left the London market have all gone from the group, FirstGroup is over its financial troubles now, and needs to grow its UK bus operations as its rail operations will pass back to UK Government. It recent purchase of coaching operations over the last few months, shows what it intends to do, further strengthend by todays agreement to buy RATP London from RATP. Other coach operations may well be in the pipeline, as will bidding for franchises. London can be brought back into a good financial shape by sharing management, back office functions, and bulk buying of vehicles and fuel.
 

Non Multi

Member
Joined
11 Dec 2017
Messages
1,170
That was pretty much summed up First country-wide back then.

The London senior management did let the local team largely get on with things. Moving to Southampton-based management hastened the decline.
Management at Empress Road did return (what remained of) First Berks to profitability, ironically something that they weren't able to achieve with their own operation at Southampton.

Will history repeat itself where dual door vehicles redundant from London because of their age be cascaded to FirstBus fleets outside the capital?
They're no good in a bus war. Bill Courtney leased a fleet of new Optare Solos and within the space of 5 years First had closed both Maidenhead and Bracknell depots. After nearly two decades of riding on First's London hand-me-downs the punters voted with their feet.
 

Goldfish62

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
11,663
They're no good in a bus war. Bill Courtney leased a fleet of new Optare Solos and within the space of 5 years First had closed both Maidenhead and Bracknell depots. After nearly two decades of riding on First's London hand-me-downs the punters voted with their feet.
Yes, I really didn't understand how they capitulated so quickly, or how Courtney had the resources to relentlessly take them on in a manner akin to Stagecoach in its "bus bandit" days.

In the end the punters, in Bracknell at least, lost out because as soon as First were vanquished Courtney cut back services, some to levels worse than First had previously run, and stuck fares up.
 

Mikey C

Established Member
Joined
11 Feb 2013
Messages
7,512
So First join Stagecoach in selling out of London, then buying back, albeit not quite the same operations. Go Ahead and Arriva must be looking on in amusement!
 

Goldfish62

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
11,663
So First join Stagecoach in selling out of London, then buying back, albeit not quite the same operations. Go Ahead and Arriva must be looking on in amusement!
What's amusing about it?

Souter sold Stagecoach London for a handsome price at a time when some difficult pay issues were looming. Macquarie had to deal with that and after a while had enough and put the business up for sale. Along came Stagecoach who bought it back at a bargain basement price and with the pay issues resolved. It was a brilliant masterstroke.

First sold their London business 13 years ago when the landscape for the industry looked very different from now. They've decided to re-enter the London market just as they and GoAhead have decided to buy a number of small independent coach operators. Neither organisation would have done that a few years ago.

Arriva and GoAhead have both changed ownership recently.
 

TheGrandWazoo

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Feb 2013
Messages
21,006
Location
Somerset with international travel (e.g. across th
There is no magic money tree in London operations nowadays .... the financial returns on route contracts are at an average of 4-5% now. There may be higher margins at the start of a contract, but over a 5 / 7 year life .... just witness the mid-term surrendering of many contracts over the last few years ....

However, balance that against the lack of risk .... if operators get their costs correct, then the income stream can be guaranteed, which is good business.

I do agree that First are moving back into London to spread their income base .... how things change in 12 years !!!
4-5% is a perfectly appropriate margin for such work (I refer to a certain P Hendy's response, back in the day but still relevant today, to Messrs Souter and Lockhead's insistence on their businesses returning 15%+ margins).

Contracts have been surrendered at the break point not because they're making 4-5%, but because they've been making substantial losses.
The fact is that it's all well and good to take a view on low margins (yea - sticking it to the man OR just getting the best for the taxpayer) but ultimately, such low margins are difficult to maintain. Of course, people will point to supermarkets but when inflation has hit as it has since Covid/Brexit, then they can pass that on to consumers readily and we are all eating.

In the provinces, we've seen a drop of 20% on post Covid patronage (being recovered more since BSIP and CBSSG and the £2 fare cap) along with inflation being a toxic mix but at least operators could put up fares and/or reduce fares to remain profitable. Problem has been, and RATP are emblematic in this, is that you win a contract based on certain assumptions (and you do price in risk). There's "competitive tension" so you want to win over the opposition so pressure to reduce margin/cost but when inflation is higher, there's limited ability to claw that back. That's what has done for operators throwing in work/losing money in London.

Yes, I really didn't understand how they capitulated so quickly, or how Courtney had the resources to relentlessly take them on in a manner akin to Stagecoach in its "bus bandit" days.

In the end the punters, in Bracknell at least, lost out because as soon as First were vanquished Courtney cut back services, some to levels worse than First had previously run, and stuck fares up.
Under the Lockhead era, they believed that they couldn't really compete at a loss (for legal reasons and well as financial).
 

185

Established Member
Joined
29 Aug 2010
Messages
5,473
Am I cynical or is First buying up these operations such as in London and these coach operations, because they know that changes to the bus market in the rest of the country with the new government are likely to make that business less lucrative?
FirstGroup can see the writing on the wall for their rail business being down to about sixteen trains by next chrimbo or the year after. Expansion in bus is the way forward to protect the business, and I'm surprised they haven't tried expanding internationally again. All the others are exiting the rail industry, Transport UK is being nicknamed 'Transport Uxbridge and Kensington' as they will likely have only the odd London bus route left within the next few months.
 

mangad

Member
Joined
20 Jun 2014
Messages
359
Location
Stockport
FirstGroup can see the writing on the wall for their rail business being down to about sixteen trains by next chrimbo or the year after. Expansion in bus is the way forward to protect the business, and I'm surprised they haven't tried expanding internationally again. All the others are exiting the rail industry, Transport UK is being nicknamed 'Transport Uxbridge and Kensington' as they will likely have only the odd London bus route left within the next few months.
Transport UK will have their 50% share in Merseyrail for a few more years yet - it's devolved. But a few concessions here and there don't make much of a rail industry for commercial entities to get excited about.
 

Goldfish62

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
11,663
The fact is that it's all well and good to take a view on low margins (yea - sticking it to the man OR just getting the best for the taxpayer) but ultimately, such low margins are difficult to maintain. Of course, people will point to supermarkets but when inflation has hit as it has since Covid/Brexit, then they can pass that on to consumers readily and we are all eating.

In the provinces, we've seen a drop of 20% on post Covid patronage (being recovered more since BSIP and CBSSG and the £2 fare cap) along with inflation being a toxic mix but at least operators could put up fares and/or reduce fares to remain profitable. Problem has been, and RATP are emblematic in this, is that you win a contract based on certain assumptions (and you do price in risk). There's "competitive tension" so you want to win over the opposition so pressure to reduce margin/cost but when inflation is higher, there's limited ability to claw that back. That's what has done for operators throwing in work/losing money in London.
Yes, I get all that, but the last few years have been exceptional, with Covid then rampant inflation akin to creating a post-war situation with the economy. And I understand very well how a lot of London contracts have come unstuck recently.

If First are re-entering London expecting handsome margins then they're going to be disappointed. They've clearly coming back in to what they see a relatively stable market through purchasing an operator that has very effectively been dug out of the doldrums by a competent management team.


Under the Lockhead era, they believed that they couldn't really compete at a loss (for legal reasons and well as financial).
Yes, you've jogged my memory on that. Their competitors obviously didn't get the memo!
 

TheGrandWazoo

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Feb 2013
Messages
21,006
Location
Somerset with international travel (e.g. across th
Yes, I get all that, but the last few years have been exceptional, with Covid then rampant inflation akin to creating a post-war situation with the economy. And I understand very well how a lot of London contracts have come unstuck recently.

If First are re-entering London expecting handsome margins then they're going to be disappointed. They've clearly coming back in to what they see a relatively stable market through purchasing an operator that has very effectively been dug out of the doldrums by a competent management team.
It was exceptional, it couldn't be predicted, and margins that low are pretty thin especially when you have limited ability to pass on any inflationary factors. First aren't expecting handsome margins - they're looking at 6-7%.

It's clearly a logical strategic move. They are going to lose their rail business, and the bedrock of their bus business is under threat from franchising in West Yorks, South Yorks and Strathclyde. RATP is a willing seller (with it being a loss maker) and First is keen to broaden their business interests.
 

Goldfish62

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
11,663
It was exceptional, it couldn't be predicted, and margins that low are pretty thin especially when you have limited ability to pass on any inflationary factors. First aren't expecting handsome margins - they're looking at 6-7%.

It's clearly a logical strategic move. They are going to lose their rail business, and the bedrock of their bus business is under threat from franchising in West Yorks, South Yorks and Strathclyde. RATP is a willing seller (with it being a loss maker) and First is keen to broaden their business interests.
Yes, absolutely, agree with all that. And I don't think anyone is going to quibble a 6-7% aspirational margin. It's the double figure stuff that would be hard to stomach.

Next one to watch is Transport UK. When they lose all their rail work they'll be left with London bus and rail replacement.
 

Roger1973

Member
Joined
5 Jul 2020
Messages
746
Location
Berkshire
Chance for Slough operations to become well managed again. The decline started when they sold off London and transferred management to Hampshire.

Maybe. Depends what they do with it.

As things currently stand, the way it's done in London and everywhere else is so different that most companies don't seem to be keen on mixing both within one operating unit - Arriva Dartford is part of the London empire and now only does TFL work, Northfleet only does non TFL work; the non London bit of Metrobus is now under Brighton and Hove, not Go-Ahead London.

Having said that, Kent Fastrack is now under Go-Ahead London, so all things are possible.
 

Top