cnjb8
Established Member
Just Meadowhall? Why not Nottingham or Derby as well?Flixbus are launching twice daily service between Leeds and London from Thursday, calling at Meadowhall in both directions
Just Meadowhall? Why not Nottingham or Derby as well?Flixbus are launching twice daily service between Leeds and London from Thursday, calling at Meadowhall in both directions
Just Meadowhall? Why not Nottingham or Derby as well?
Is the service not using the M1?Same Reason as Megabus, its Right not to the motorway.
I'd assume so. Serving Meadowhall is 10? minutes delay, Derby would be 40?, Nottingham another 40?. East midlands parkway might be viable for a 10-15? minutes delay. Question marks because I'm not local so somebody is bound to point out that I need to add/subtract 5 minutes somewhere however the overall point would be the same.Is the service not using the M1?
I don't know why these companies think it's optional. It's not!Snap make sure that contractors provide accessible vehicles wherever possible. Nearest yhe same
Snap make sure that contractors provide accessible vehicles wherever possible. Nearest yhe same
Or provide a free taxi?
It gets rid of the actual issue (for the person trying to use it) but not the offence.Or provide a free taxi?
Sounds right.I'd assume so. Serving Meadowhall is 10? minutes delay, Derby would be 40?, Nottingham another 40?. East midlands parkway might be viable for a 10-15? minutes delay. Question marks because I'm not local so somebody is bound to point out that I need to add/subtract 5 minutes somewhere however the overall point would be the same.
Just Meadowhall? Why not Nottingham or Derby as well?
In fact, it only applies to vehicles with "a capacity exceeding 22 passengers" which appears to include standing capacity on a bus. A typical 17 seats and 5 standing Mercedes Sprinter or similar, would not be covered.All vehicles used on timetabled public transport bus or coach services (presently except rail replacement, but only temporarily) must be capable of carrying at least one wheelchair with that wheelchair loaded without the user having to leave it.
Snap make sure that contractors provide accessible vehicles wherever possible.
I'd say Snap is in a grey area, because it is not timetabled as such, but rather runs on demand. My understanding of their business model is that by and large, journeys only operate when there are sufficient passengers commited to travel. I don't think it is an intentional way of avoiding PSVAR, rather it's a category that didn't exist when the regulations were drawn up two decades ago.I don't know why these companies think it's optional. It's not!
I've not seen any coach company serving either Derby or Nottingham on services between Leeds and London except on overnight coach services where journey times are less important (and traffic levels are lower). Derby is served by some National Express services between Manchester and London.
Correct, in fact they still do southbound on a Sunday morning.I think, but may be wrong, that Megabus used to have a service that ran London to Leeds via Nottingham.
School services are also exempt but obv doesn't apply here.No, that also isn't good enough. All vehicles used on timetabled public transport bus or coach services (presently except rail replacement, but only temporarily) must be capable of carrying at least one wheelchair with that wheelchair loaded without the user having to leave it. It is an offence to use a vehicle which is not so accessible.
There is a classic exemption but other than that nothing I know of.
School services are also exempt but obv doesn't apply here.
No, all school contracts are exempt from PSVAR until 31 July 2021Surely, it's only the dedicated school 'closed contract' services that are excluded ?
The 465 does London, Nottingham, Mansfield, Chesterfield , Sheffield all the way to Huddersfield.
I think, but may be wrong, that Megabus used to have a service that ran London to Leeds via Nottingham.
We would need to see the nearside of those new Van Hools to see if they have wheelchair lifts.Well today the first Leeds to London was a non PSVAR and this photo have been taken from FB Flixbus UK Coach enthusiast so there no sign of them giving up on using non PSVAR coaches
A post on Friends of the PSV Circle on Facebook has a photo of one of the services being operated by a Temsa which is appears to be PSVAR compliant at least.Well today the first Leeds to London was a non PSVAR and this photo have been taken from FB Flixbus UK Coach enthusiast so there no sign of them giving up on using non PSVAR coaches
We would need to see the nearside of those new Van Hools to see if they have wheelchair lifts.
Well today the first Leeds to London was a non PSVAR and this photo have been taken from FB Flixbus UK Coach enthusiast so there no sign of them giving up on using non PSVAR coaches
Wheelchair accessible but not compliant. It’s missing various other requirements of psvarA post on Friends of the PSV Circle on Facebook has a photo of one of the services being operated by a Temsa which is appears to be PSVAR compliant at least.
There's plenty of nearside photos online that confirm they don't.
![]()
It’s fitted with destination screens too albeit they weren’t programmed...Wheelchair accessible but not compliant. It’s missing various other requirements of psvar