yoyothehobo
Member
- Joined
- 21 Aug 2015
- Messages
- 685
Netherlands arent a big team, certainly nothing special since 2010/4. A Netherlands side that finished third in their group and sneaked into the knockout stagesAre the Netherlands not a "big" team then?
We've gone from not qualifying (2008), losing to Iceland (20160 and finishing bottom of the group (2012) to beating the Germans and the Dutch in knock-out football.
Like what, putting Watkins and Palmer on in the semi (Palmer assist, Watkins goal) and the same again in the final?
Kane's not been fit, obviously, and you have to question whether resting him earlier would have helped. But "too old, too slow, past it" Harry Kane's just scored 44 goals in 45 starts for Bayern Munich this season. It's a braver man than me who drops him for Ivan Toney, who's scored 4 goals for Brentford since coming back from suspension.
We played well against Germany in 2018, arguably the best Southgates England ever played, but it was an admittedly poor Germany Side and it was 6 years ago. If the best we have to go off is that we beat Germany 6 years ago, we beat Argentina in the group stages in 2002.
All this shows me realistically is that England are roughly at the same level we have ever been at, with 2008-2016 being a poor patch.
I wouldnt mind but the football we have played for the last couple of years has been turgid, unadventurous and tactically conservative to the point of the aim of each game is not to lose, rather than to win.
He made his first change against the Netherlands 80 minutes in. Its reactionary, he never looks to change the game. Kane was doing nothing at that point and the change were 15 minutes too late.
Same with in the final. Kane was clearly unfit and his presence was negative on the whole team performance and shape. Once the sub was made things improved massively...for 10-15 minutes.
I have watched Spain through the tournament and they have been by far the best team, tactically and their game management was top notch. There is absolutely no reason England players can not perform to that level, especially after 8 years as coach.
Kane should have been rested for the last group game when we were guaranteed qualification and thats when we could have used Toney, Watkins, Gordon, Palmer. Experimented with no risk.
The fact is we lucked out massively ending up on the side of the draw we did and we would have likely lost to Italy, France, Germany or Portugal
The tournament as a whole was massively disappointing with Englands matches being some of the worst.
I believe that Southgate is just bang average and would i take the risk with a more forward facing manager who would take more risks but make watching England enjoyable? 100%