chilledout
Member
Hi, I’ve received a rather nasty email from WMT - threatening potential prosecution for delay repay claims. Has anyone else had this and how did you deal with it please?
West Midland Trains – Delay Repay SchemeCan you please post the full details of the email you received, excluding any personal identifying information.
I don't believe is not a good start.I don’t believe I have claimed fraudulently. I am a season ticket holder and claim for my trains that are cancelled. Often have to catch later trains or simply go home.
Bought on an app. An e ticket.Is that a physical season ticket or one on a smartcard?
I don't believe is not a good start.
Understood thank you - that’s very helpful. My ticket is very rarely scanned. If at all….there are also no barriers at my departure or arrival station.What the train company often does is compare the scan data from the e-ticket against your claim.
So look at the first journey they included on their list.
Now think back to what ticket scans you actually had that day.
Put the two together and will it make sense?
If it was a claim for a delay, will the scans match up with the delay you claimed?
If it was a claim for a cancellation, will the scans show that you caught the next available service and were delayed by the amount claimed for?
If there are very few routine scans of your ticket then it seems they have extremely little evidence with which to back up their threats.
How many claims have you made, and over what period of time?I don’t believe I have claimed fraudulently. I am a season ticket holder and claim for my trains that are cancelled. Often have to catch later trains or simply go home.
This isn’t necessarily so. It’s quite possible to detect and prove fraud based even on paper tickets, if people have been claiming for journeys they didn’t take.If there are very few routine scans of your ticket then it seems they have extremely little evidence with which to back up their threats.
Thank you. I wasn’t aware that I can’t claim for a trip that was cancelled; where I’ve had to alter my arrangements. Also the claim form doesn’t question whether I caught a later trains - the train company decide whether they will refund the single trip - or the return fare….When you "simply go home" and so don't travel, you cannot claim Delay Repay. Have you done this? Perhaps they detected it.
Another thing that they can catch people for is people who make claims based on railway data on various websites when that doesn't reflect what actually happened to passengers at the station. There are times when people at the station aren't delayed in the way website data suggests they might have been.
You can only claim for journeys where you travelled and were delayed. If you just decide to go home, or perhaps travel later instead, you can’t claim.Thank you. I wasn’t aware that I can’t claim for a trip that was cancelled; where I’ve had to alter my arrangements. Also the claim form doesn’t question whether I caught a later trains - the train company decide whether they will refund the single trip - or the return fare….
Okay. So you’d recommend to not reply to their email please?You can only claim for journeys where you travelled and were delayed. If you just decide to go home, or perhaps travel later instead, you can’t claim.
At this stage you might well be better off saying nothing at all to WMT, either in defence or explanation.
Yes - if you pass the plausibility test, I definitely recommend not replying. If you give us a rough idea of how many claims you have made over a certain time period we can tell you if it stands out as implausible. If you're claiming for every single day at random times - and you just so happen to have been "delayed" by a cancellation every time you wanted to travel, this alone might be enough for the company to really dig deep.You haven't told us enough details to comment on whether or not it's a good idea to reply. In particular AlterEgo's question about the frequency and value of claims, leading to the question of plausibility under the rules.
The WMR claim form asks for "Length of delay" (15+ mins, 30+ mins, 60+ mins or 120+ mins). What length of delay did you claim for if you didn't travel? The length of delay claimed for determines the repay amount (as 12.5%, 25%, 50% or 100%, respectively, of the equivalent daily rate, calculated by dividing the season ticket price by the nominal number of working days it is valid for as outlined under "See how much you're entitled to" on the WMR delay repay information page).Thank you. I wasn’t aware that I can’t claim for a trip that was cancelled; where I’ve had to alter my arrangements. Also the claim form doesn’t question whether I caught a later trains - the train company decide whether they will refund the single trip - or the return fare….
Delay Repay fraud is difficult to prove to a criminal standard but there have been some high profile cases of such fraud which has ended up in jail time.
Do we have a source for this please? If it's from WMR's website it might be a useful one to quote if anyone else turns up with a similar case.Things you can't do with West Midlands Railway (NB the rules can be different for different train companies):
Claim for delay repay when you did not make the journey. If a train is cancelled and you decide not to travel, you don't get any compensation under Delay Repay. (If it happened regularly, you could instead make a separate claim under consumer law.)
Claim for delay repay for a train at a different time from the time you actually travelled. Claims are based on the ACTUAL delay you incurred, based on comparing your actual arrival time with the timetabled one. If a train is delayed and you decide to defer your journey and travel a couple of hours later instead, you cannot claim based on the original train you were going to catch, but only based on the schedule of the new one as if you'd planned to catch that one all along.
If the stations the OP uses have no barriers (as described by the OP) would they have CCTV?People have been given suspended prison sentences of over a year (plus unpaid work) for false claims totalling over £2000 where the train company produced CCTV evidence showing that they had travelled on earlier trains than the ones they claimed for. All the cases I've seen reported have included clear-cut misrepresentation. (Others created multiple identities or falsified tickets.)
Yes, but it's pretty unlikely that they'll have checked it.If the stations the OP uses have no barriers (as described by the OP) would they have CCTV?
Thanks for letting us know - both because it brings you closure, and because it will help us to give good advice to anyone who asks us about something similar in future.Thank you All for your input and guidance; all remedied with WMT today. There was a day where somehow I’d claimed for 4 cancelled journeys instead of 1 - where they paid out. Refunding those. All closed.
Thank you All for your input and guidance; all remedied with WMT today. There was a day where somehow I’d claimed for 4 cancelled journeys instead of 1 - where they paid out. Refunding those. All closed.