reddragon
Established Member
Re-opening a half rebuilt disused railway along its original abandoned corridor with the full support of all around is never going to be refused, at worst challenged & conditions added.
but wasn't that on a technicality that the extra visitors might cause the sewage works to put extra phosphorus into the river? Everybody else wants it, but the water company have a veto because they don't want to invest...I think the Bala Lake thought similarly about their extension, but it got rejected.
It was, but it meant that all the money spent on the application was lost. As you say, virtually everyone, including the local council was in favour. I don't think that the Bala Lake are in a position to lean on WW to ignore a statutory requirement, less still have the kind of money to bung at them for an upgrade to the sewage treatment works.but wasn't that on a technicality that the extra visitors might cause the sewage works to put extra phosphorus into the river? Everybody else wants it, but the water company have a veto because they don't want to invest...
I suspect this is another application which will be passed just as soon as WW have been leant on, or bunged some money for the sewage works upgrade.
It's amazing that improvements to the tourist offering which have been in development for a decade or more get stopped because the owner of one bit of the infrastructure hasn't been paying attention...
You say full support. Is that true? Has there ever been any opposition to it from residents or businesses? I recall some years back some issues with residents at LoughboroughRe-opening a half rebuilt disused railway along its original abandoned corridor with the full support of all around is never going to be refused, at worst challenged & conditions added.
It'll still be reversing at 50 steps.Just to clear something up, when complete, will northbound trains have to reverse into Rudington, or will there be a new curve or a new station?
Well, the "intercity" bit would never have been accurate. "Not Nottingham to Not Leicester" isn't really a catchy phrase to attract visitors.Well that's going to rather ruin the "main line intercity route" schtik.
Wasn't being technically within the city of Leicester one of the trains the southern terminus was built a few hundred yards south of the Belgrave and Birstall station site?Well, the "intercity" bit would never have been accurate. "Not Nottingham to Not Leicester" isn't really a catchy phrase to attract visitors.
The Ruddington site is served by normal Nottingham *City* Transport buses so as far as I'm concerned, it's in the City of Nottingham - for public transport purposes (even though it's not actually within the city boundary).Well, the "intercity" bit would never have been accurate. "Not Nottingham to Not Leicester" isn't really a catchy phrase to attract visitors.
Well, the "intercity" bit would never have been accurate. "Not Nottingham to Not Leicester" isn't really a catchy phrase to attract visitors.
It'll still be reversing at 50 steps
which was my reaction too... I well remember a journey changing at Limerick Junction when it seemed that every train had to reverse into the platform if it was to call there!Shame they couldn't have some Irish stock, such reversals were once very common there.
There is a new GCR video about the current state of the Reunification project (I'm sure somebody can put a link in, my IT skills are rubbish!).