• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

GWR PAYG

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,594
I may have read slightly more into the Guardian report of Labour intentions than was meant, but there is an implication that contactless fares would be widespread, although 'more and more of the country' could mean a large number of isolated areas. Which would not seem especially national and could lead to a widespread extension of the current problems where people mistakenly travel from London to Bristol on some sort of London PAYG card, and are surprised to be charged a real fare en route. Presumably if they have not tapped out in London they also get an incomplete journey fare.

See: https://www.theguardian.com/busines...-rail-travel-and-will-it-make-tickets-cheaper

'Things can be improved, Labour says, as contactless tap-in and tap-out payments extend through more and more of the country, opening up the possibility of a Transport for London-style system, where fares are streamlined and automatically capped or refunded.'
Yes, it’s definitely the sort of vague wording that can be read two ways.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Haywain

Veteran Member
Joined
3 Feb 2013
Messages
15,676
could lead to a widespread extension of the current problems where people mistakenly travel from London to Bristol on some sort of London PAYG card, and are surprised to be charged a real fare en route.
Is this a significant problem?
 

sleepy_hollow

Member
Joined
9 Jan 2018
Messages
118
Is this a significant problem?
A guard seemed to think that she had met it often enough to be worth mentioning, but did not give any statistics. She recommended an ITSO card instead, but this is probably irrelevant to PAYG.

I do recall then looking at the wording of a website relating to some London PAYG system and wondering if the reference to validity on National Rail trains could be misinterpreted as meaning the whole national railway network. Not everyone is a pedant like me who would check that carefully. After all the whole point of PAYG is to make busy lives easier, so in London crowds rush through the terminals listening for the beep, whereas here in Bristol OAPs like me take a careful stance in front of the terminal and watch carefully to see exactly what the message is so as to commit it to memory. This does not cause delay because I have never seen anyone else using a PAYG card, although guards seem to be familiar so presumably someone else must.
 
Last edited:

fandroid

Established Member
Joined
9 Nov 2014
Messages
1,761
Location
Hampshire
Me when I want a Travelcard not on a weekend.
Why "not on a weekend". My regular purchase of an outboundary Travelcard on a Smartcard is for Friday travel (& bought online).

I favour it because it's a single mode eticket useable where TfL's current policy is to ignore e-Tickets on smartphones. It also doesn't need a battery and isn't dependent on firing up an app for inspections or ticket gates.

(*last para added later)
 
Last edited:

Haywain

Veteran Member
Joined
3 Feb 2013
Messages
15,676
Why "not on a weekend". My regular purchase of an outboundary Travelcard on a Smartcard is for Friday travel (& bought online).
Because GTR Super Off Peak Travelcards are not fulfilled to smartcards?
 

lachlan

Member
Joined
11 Aug 2019
Messages
820
Chippenham to Bristol Parkway is only valid via Bath, but it can be quicker doubling back at Swindon. One benefit of this expanded system is presumably it's now valid to travel either route with a tap card - and I would imagine it will charge you the cheaper rate unless you tap in/out at Swindon on the way
 

sleepy_hollow

Member
Joined
9 Jan 2018
Messages
118
Yes, it’s definitely the sort of vague wording that can be read two ways.
Although I expect that my original interpretation, 'nationwide' was probably what the journalist thought it meant, and probably what Labour think it means.

The paper version of the Guardian article also included praise for the success of LNER, for the taxpayer, not the customer. In fact PAYG is also a single leg pricing system, currently modulated by the continuing existence of the off-peak return tickets. Take those out and you have the LNER system, and PAYG getting the best fare means adding up all the single legs to get the one and only fare, the main change being that you are encouraged not to enquire about the cost in advance, just open your wallet so that the government can extract the 'full fruits of their labour' (Former Clause IV). (I assume that the 70 min train variation ticket would not find its way into PAYG.)

(https://www.theguardian.com/busines...-rail-travel-and-will-it-make-tickets-cheaper)
240503-5995 Guardian railway nationalisation - LNER success ref.JPG

PS: Saw someone else using a PAYG card at Sea Mills last Friday. He said it was the first time and he had been persuaded by the adverts. I gave him a short briefing on the perils and things to watch. Like me he was out cycling, which seems to be the main target market, because for open jaw and single journeys PAYG can save money, also good for indeterminate plans. Just need more cycle spaces to match the target market.
 
Last edited:

Top