even considering UK marginal electricity supply is LNG imported from middle east? I'm sure better but also by nowhere near as much as people think. UK will still need gas for some time, better to at least get more from the North Sea for far fewer emissions than imported LNG. Also (though marginal) make sure batteries are charged overnight especially when surplus power available
there's so much incorrect about this, an incomplete list:
- The vast majority of UK gas comes from UK and Norwegian fields (~50% UK production, ~33% Norwegian production), with LNG from the middle east and the US being relatively minor, no matter what it is used for.
- The grid will get greener than it is now every year (due to more renewables and new nuclear coming online), so grid carbon intensity today isn't an accurate depiction of the carbon intensity of an electrified railway in a few years, it will be lower
- Both the Tories and Labour have promised fossil-fuel-free electricity production in the medium term (labour by 2030, the conservatives by 2035)
- New gas projects take many years to come online - anything newly licenced now is unlikely to be in production before 2035
- the marginal electricity isn't always gas, it can in fact be renewables (it's quite often wind in Scotland)
- the emissions intensity of marginal electricity is a flawed concept for many analyses, including this one. Average carbon intensity is more suitable, ideally using a short timeframe (e.g. half-hour blocks). If you (or anyone else) want to discuss this point in detail please start a new thread and quote this post, it is definitely off-topic here
If you (or anyone else) want to discuss these point in detail please start a new thread and quote this post, it is definitely off-topic here
Especially in Scotland, where this project is, the emissions intensity of electricity is very low, and it will only continue to drop during the life of the infrastructure.