matacaster
On Moderation
- Joined
- 19 Jan 2013
- Messages
- 1,604
As above.
According to ITV news’ Robert Peston, Rishi Sunak intends on allocating billions of pounds of the projects’ money to other investments in the north of England.
I am told the PM has now taken the decision to shelve the Manchester leg of HS2. Confirmation, and detail of the re-allocation of funds to other transport projects in the north, will presumably come very soon.
There are times when I won't believe anything the government says until it actually happens.Won't believe anything the mainstream media say until it's announced by the government themselves.
Let's wait and see what these other transport projects are before judging too harshly. Thinking about it they will probably be out of office before any of them start so Manchester leg might be reinstated by the new incoming government.They scrap the leg to Manchester while at their conference in Manchester. That's "brass neck act of the year" decided.
Let's wait and see what these other transport projects are before judging too harshly. Thinking about it they will probably be out of office before any of them start so Manchester leg might be reinstated by the new incoming government.
Previous practice by outgoing governments who cancel things is to put them beyond any hope of recovery before they leave office.Thinking about it they will probably be out of office before any of them start so Manchester leg might be reinstated by the new incoming government.
It would take years because you'd have to go through the Hybrid Bill process again to regain powers to obtain the land.2A wouldn't be too hard to reinstate even if the land was all sold, it's mostly through open farmland.
Reminds us which bit is 2A. Is that the Manchester past?2A wouldn't be too hard to reinstate even if the land was all sold, it's mostly through open farmland.
2B was in doubt anyway, wasn't it?
Birmingham to Crewe, through open terrain and still managing to cost as much as an alpine base tunnel.Reminds us which bit is 2A. Is that the Manchester past?
I try not to think about the possibility of them adopting a scorched-earth policy, but decisions like this make it hard to avoid thinking it is.Let's wait and see what these other transport projects are before judging too harshly. Thinking about it they will probably be out of office before any of them start so Manchester leg might be reinstated by the new incoming government.
Reminds us which bit is 2A. Is that the Manchester past?
Wouldn't surprise me at this stage! The government will want to make Labour look as bad as possible in advance of the election. Something along the lines of 'labour will spend billions reinstating HS2 when it could fund X nurses in Y brand new hospitals'. Even though we all know capital funding doesn't quite work like that.I try not to think about the possibility of them adopting a scorched-earth policy, but decisions like this make it hard to avoid thinking it is.
They scrap the leg to Manchester while at their conference in Manchester. That's "brass neck act of the year" decided.
Certainly it will stop further land purchases.Selling the land, now that the compulsory purchase powers have been extinguished would essentially kill the scheme permanently.
Eg TSR2Previous practice by outgoing governments who cancel things is to put them beyond any hope of recovery before they leave office.
Oops misread that ...I thought you'd put RIP!Good job they published the IRP
Won't believe the media, but will believe the government when they announce it - I mean that's one way of looking at it!Won't believe anything the mainstream media say until it's announced by the government themselves.
A conventional railway would have suffered from the same budgetary problems as HS2, it would not hav ebeen significantly cheaper.Should have built a conventional railway London to Birmingham. Probably using part of the GC route. Spend the money saved on reinstating the slow lines on the ECML and other route upgrades.
Not significantly, and will save piles of money in the long run.Laying all the track on a concrete slab must have pushed up the price.
What Andy Burnham says is pretty irrelevant he doesn't dictate labour policy nor does he have any money. He's just going to make vacuous speeches.Another brilliant decision by this lame duck 'Government'. The quicker they are gone the better. I'd like to hear what Andy Burnham has to say about it...
They have been for ages...This is a dark day, I expect other countries to be laughing at us right now.
Someone still owns farmland and it can command a very high price if circumstances are right.2A wouldn't be too hard to reinstate even if the land was all sold, it's mostly through open farmland.
2B was in doubt anyway, wasn't it?
Should have built a conventional railway London to Birmingham. Probably using part of the GC route. Spend the money saved on reinstating the slow lines on the ECML and other route upgrades.Laying all the track on a concrete slab must have pushed up the price.
When will a member of the Shadow Cabinet be announcing the commitment of the Labour Party to go ahead with the Birmingham to Manchester stage of HS2?Let's wait and see what these other transport projects are before judging too harshly. Thinking about it they will probably be out of office before any of them start so Manchester leg might be reinstated by the new incoming government.