Class 170101
Established Member
- Joined
- 1 Mar 2014
- Messages
- 8,358
Presumably it required some public money so its now dead. That being said I can see an advantage of avoiding Central London. Not everyone wants to go to London.
Transatlantic licenses went ages ago. Any airlines is free to fly to any airport n the UK from across the pond. they just choose not to.
Another project kicked into touch by DfT, according to New Civil Engineer:
It's absolutely barking - unless you are a plane nut or inside the industry and unable to see the downsides.
Give the transatlantic licenses back to Manchester and Prestwick (that were confiscated a decade or two ago to boost Heathrow) and lots of the UK population that want to go west won't need to go to the south-east anyway. Saves on shuttle flights and makes slots available for London-land travellers without enlarging either Gatwick or Heathrow.
Hasn't anyone read the warnings about how important and urgent it is to use less fossil fuel? Air travel is about the most energy-wasteful mode there is over short and medium distances - apart from helicopters and rocket transfers of course!
Transatlantic licenses went ages ago. Any airlines is free to fly to any airport n the UK from across the pond. they just choose not to.
Might even have been Dagenham?It was, indeed, another project filed under “Three stops past Plaistow”...
No it didn’t get that farMight even have been Dagenham?![]()
If these private companies wanted to build a line and then be unable to run trains beyond Heathrow as the GWML mains and HS2 have no spare paths for non-London trains, then they should go for it.Depends on the funding arrangement. If it had been largely private with an element of DfT funding then no good reason why it shouldn't happen.