• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

In future if storms like today occur, should ALL trains be cancelled in advance?

Status
Not open for further replies.

4F89

Member
Joined
17 Aug 2018
Messages
860
With the entire network being buggered up, and therefore everyone claiming back, is it not as sensible to cancel everything and save at least the fuel costs and risks to life/damage etc?? If the advice is not to travel, surely that should extend to staff too?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

GRALISTAIR

Established Member
Joined
11 Apr 2012
Messages
7,906
Location
Dalton GA USA & Preston Lancs
With the entire network being buggered up, and therefore everyone claiming back, is it not as sensible to cancel everything and save at least the fuel costs and risks to life/damage etc?? If the advice is not to travel, surely that should extend to staff too?
Absolutely so that staff safety has to be considered very seriously
 

30907

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
18,136
Location
Airedale
The risk to life and of damage is mitigated by the speed limit imposed.
The general advice not to travel is because the reduced number of trains could not cope with normal numbers, the hugely extended journey times, and the difficulty of providing alternative transport when floods, trampolines or trees cause short notice problems.

PS I am not traincrew, so feel free to ignore me if you believe there is a real risk in today's conditions (and speak with your union).
 

brad465

Established Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
7,076
Location
Taunton or Kent
Before everything is cancelled in such an event, there could be measures greater deployed to mitigate disruption, such as clearing trees away from linesides, or at least cutting their size down to stop them blocking the line if they fall over. Better fencing around railway lines as well maybe worth doing to prevent obstacles like trampolines getting on railway lines. Coastal routes would be hard to mitigate for, although building/reopening diversionary routes to avoid them can help in cases like Dawlish (another story), otherwise if they're short stretches towards the end of a journey closing the coastal sections and having replacement buses complete the last bit if possible.

Deploying all of this over the entire network is a big ask, but may help priority/busy routes.
 

StephenHunter

Established Member
Joined
22 Jul 2017
Messages
2,155
Location
London
Cutting away trees from linesides, which was the norm when steam was a thing, would increase the risk of landslides. As for trampolines. they're very capable of flying over a fence in a storm.

The Austrians have pre-emptively cancelled nearly all their NightJet services for tonight, which is a rare occurrence for a region that frequently deals with heavy snow.
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
18,914
With the entire network being buggered up, and therefore everyone claiming back, is it not as sensible to cancel everything and save at least the fuel costs and risks to life/damage etc?? If the advice is not to travel, surely that should extend to staff too?

You can't say that the whole network is affected - looking at the trains at Reigate on the relatively low speed North Downs Line, almost everything has run on time today apart from a period this morning and some later cancellations.

https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/search/detailed/REI/2020-02-09/0200-0159?stp=WVS&show=all&order=wtt

Are you telling us that none of these trains should have run because of a blanket view of the weather and possible disruption?
 

brad465

Established Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
7,076
Location
Taunton or Kent
Cutting away trees from linesides, which was the norm when steam was a thing, would increase the risk of landslides. As for trampolines. they're very capable of flying over a fence in a storm.
Okay I stand corrected on the trampoline problem, although coppicing trees, when done correctly would keep the root structure while allowing tree regrowth, if this retains stability?
 

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
16,776
In the very long term, HS2 should have been built entirely in tunnel so it is effectively immune to this.
 

30907

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
18,136
Location
Airedale
The Austrians have pre-emptively cancelled nearly all their NightJet services for tonight, which is a rare occurrence for a region that frequently deals with heavy snow.
That's because DB have shut their network down - other routes are fine! Lots to do with wind, little to do with snow :)
 

randyrippley

Established Member
Joined
21 Feb 2016
Messages
5,151
Cutting away trees from linesides, which was the norm when steam was a thing, would increase the risk of landslides. ......................

Thats absolute rubbish.
Trees on a slope are more likely to destabilise the slope - the combined weight of a tree and the windshear are likely to twist it out of the ground. Contrary to public belief most treeroots go sideways not down, and there is very little holding a tree in a cutting in place. Bit of rain softening the ground and it take little rain to uproot the tree and rip the bank apart
 

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
16,776
Thats absolute rubbish.
Trees on a slope are more likely to destabilise the slope - the combined weight of a tree and the windshear are likely to twist it out of the ground. Contrary to public belief most treeroots go sideways not down, and there is very little holding a tree in a cutting in place. Bit of rain softening the ground and it take little rain to uproot the tree and rip the bank apart
One problem is removing trees that are extant can cause odd things to happen to the local water table.
Which can do odd things to the cutting.
 
Joined
31 Jan 2020
Messages
345
Location
Inverness
With the entire network being buggered up, and therefore everyone claiming back, is it not as sensible to cancel everything and save at least the fuel costs and risks to life/damage etc?? If the advice is not to travel, surely that should extend to staff too?
Railways provide a service.

If they called it off the minute they thought it might lose them money through fuel or delay repay then no-one would be able to rely on that service. If there is a genuine risk to life then no-one could expect the railways to run. But a blanket closure because services during severe weather are difficult or loss making is unreasonable.

People have a right to expect that railway services will be running as long as it's practical to do so.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top