Trainguy34
Member
Can you provide text and maybe an image, twitter is playing up here.
Can you provide text and maybe an image, twitter is playing up here.
Tweet quoted:Can you provide text and maybe an image, twitter is playing up here.
Paul Clifton
@PaulCliftonBBC
Looks like the Crewkerne tunnel landslip has returned just a few weeks after the last repair. (With apologies for error in previous post, deleted)
Another farce, nothing running again!
Are GWR not compelled to accept tickets as passengers would otherwise be stranded?Also, GWR acceptance WAS in place this morning but has been withdrawn again without warning or notice. I know GWR have massive issues too but they are no worse now then when it was in place earlier. You'd think after last time they'd have gotten better at least at sorting ticket acceptance but no. I note that Network Rail Wessex aren't as quick to admit their works at Crewkerne have failed for a second time as they are to promote their excellence each time they finish their half ass fixing works.....that then subsequently fail several weeks or less later each time. Comically poor. I know the rain was nuts last night and knocked out most of southern England but, having had 3 goes at fixing Crewkerne once and for all, surely there needs to be a proper investigation into their utter incompetence.
Another farce, nothing running again!
The problem with this ticket acceptance not being advertised is that last time it got withdrawn without warning like this time and unless you can tweet them and get the right twitter member you are refused travel. Last time only one of the twitter team approved tickets on GWR and if you msged back 2 minutes later and got a different person you were told validity was not in place! Also, surely it's discrimination as it means only those with Twitter are allowed to travel.I agree it’s poor, but how should SWR resource the train service?
I believe ticket acceptance is in place however not advertised due to the “do not travel” message
I think it's an issue we've discussed many times before and involves a shuttle! Last time it happened and they threw the trowel in everyone at Yeovil sat spare. (I have that on VERY good authority), if you have that many crews sat spare you can rustle something up, even if it's a peak hours only service. They knew at 1700 last night that the line would be closed for a while, according to the control log that was shared by someone on "X", admittedly there are still services running east of Yeovil which does change things somewhat from the complete and total farce of before Christmas, but any competent resources could jig things about.I agree it’s poor, but how should SWR resource the train service?
I believe ticket acceptance is in place however not advertised due to the “do not travel” message
I agree it’s poor, but how should SWR resource the train service?
I think it's an issue we've discussed many times before and involves a shuttle! Last time it happened and they threw the trowel in everyone at Yeovil sat spare. (I have that on VERY good authority), if you have that many crews sat spare you can rustle something up, even if it's a peak hours only service. They knew at 1700 last night that the line would be closed for a while, according to the control log that was shared by someone on "X", admittedly there are still services running east of Yeovil which does change things somewhat from the complete and total farce of before Christmas, but any competent resources could jig things about.
It's the fact they do absolutely nothing, they don't even try.
I'm just enjoying the mental image of someone "throwing in the trowel".\snip/ Last time it happened and they threw the trowel in everyone at Yeovil sat spare. \snip/
But how do you get crew from Yeovil to Axminster, work a shuttle, then get them on their own booked service back at Yeovil Jn with a right time departure?
Again, a valid point but not something that can be addressed overnight by SWR.Which really does seriously now pose the question as the majority of traffic west of Yeovil points to Exeter should operation of the line be revised to give a bigger focus on the Exeter end for stations beyond Yeovil.
SWR and GWR are owned by the same company so surely this shouldn't be as difficult as it's being made out to be (appreciating rolling stock and crew knowledge are major issues etc), even in the currently climate and allowing for DfT incompetence. Cutting off Crewkerne to Pinhoe almost weekly seems to just be being accepted as normal now. Surely, even if you reduce Yeovil to Sailsbury to two hourly and/or cancel the Frome services to provide something Exeter side it's better than just giving up. I get rail rplacement is a challenge but at least allow local bus use to Exeter, Taunton and Dorchester. GWR have allowed Jet Black from Newbury this morning so yet again they are trying harder.
CREWKERNE TUNNEL LANDSLIP UPDATE - 4PM
We're pleased to confirm the line between Exeter St Davids and Yeovil will reopen and services will resume tomorrow (Saturday 6) morning.
We're very sorry to any passengers whose journeys have been disrupted today.
Better news from @NetworkRailWssx
This drone footage is worth a gander .. https://x.com/PaulCliftonBBC/status/1743425281585512800?s=20 That drone footage clearly shows the large amount of heavy stone brought in by road HGVs to construct the Contractors vehicle etc access tracks and that will in itself (and with its water run off ) not helped the stability of the area above the tunnel portal ..look what happened in similar circumstances above the portal at the eastern end of Honiton Tunnel last year. | ||||
|