• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Linsinger SF06-UK Rail Milling Trains Authorised to Enter Service

Status
Not open for further replies.

FrodshamJnct

Established Member
Joined
14 Apr 2019
Messages
3,455
Location
Cheshire
The ORR has authorised the placing in service of 2 SF06-UK rail milling trains.


“THE RAILWAYS (INTEROPERABILITY) REGULATIONS 2011, AS AMENDED AUTHORISATION OF 2 OFF LINSINGER SF06-UK RAIL MILLING TRAINS
I refer to your application for authorisation, received on the 31 August 2020 (dated 28 August 2020). Following review of your application, I can confirm that ORR grants a first authorisation under regulation 4(1)(a) of the Railways (Interoperability) Regulations 2011, as amended. This authorisation is for the placing in service of 2 off, Linsinger SF06-UK rail milling trains -
Train 1
 Carrier DR79102, EVN 99709 127 007-1
 Trailer DR79103, EVN 99709 327 000-2
Train 2
 Carrier DR79104, EVN 99709 127 008-9
 Trailer DR79103, EVN 99709 327 002-0”.

49A2FF03-7580-4236-AE74-E4915EC179C8.jpeg
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

rebmcr

Established Member
Joined
15 Nov 2011
Messages
3,851
Location
St Neots
Is there significance to the "2 off" spelling rather than "2 of", or is it just an embarassing typo?
 

gg1

Established Member
Joined
2 Jun 2011
Messages
1,905
Location
Birmingham
Is it me or does it look somewhat evil, as if it's planning to murder Thomas and Percy then frame Gordon for the crime?
 

Peter Mugridge

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Apr 2010
Messages
14,829
Location
Epsom
Train 1
 Carrier DR79102, EVN 99709 127 007-1
 Trailer DR79103, EVN 99709 327 000-2
Train 2
 Carrier DR79104, EVN 99709 127 008-9
 Trailer DR79103, EVN 99709 327 002-0”.

Should that second 79103 be 79105 please?
 

class ep-09

Member
Joined
5 Sep 2013
Messages
524
Looks like one of the Transformers ( Megatron ).

How would will call it on the railways - Trainsformer perhaps ?

That one could be Tamperus Prime
 

DustyBin

Established Member
Joined
20 Sep 2020
Messages
3,632
Location
First Class
Looks like one of the Transformers ( Megatron ).

How would will call it on the railways - Trainsformer perhaps ?

That one could be Tamperus Prime

I was just going to mention Transformers, it does have that look about it!

It has a little bit of Class 60 about it around the windscreen area, I was going to say Class 60 crossed with X but I can’t think what X could be!

It’s an impressive looking machine anyway.
 

DelW

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2015
Messages
3,879
I don't think I understand.
Usually meaning the number to be made, e.g.:
4 off widget type A
12 off widget type B

and often combined with "no.", short for "number":
8no. off widget type C

Maybe coming from off the order list, or off the production line?
 

Elecman

Established Member
Joined
31 Dec 2013
Messages
2,903
Location
Lancashire
Usually meaning the number to be made, e.g.:
4 off widget type A
12 off widget type B

and often combined with "no.", short for "number":
8no. off widget type C

Maybe coming from off the order list, or off the production line?
They shouldn’t be referred to as 8no.Off as that’s in effect double counting it’s either 8no... or 8 off ...
 

DelW

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2015
Messages
3,879
They shouldn’t be referred to as 8no.Off as that’s in effect double counting it’s either 8no... or 8 off ...
I'm sure I've seen it done with both, but I accept your point that strictly it's wrong :oops:
 

rebmcr

Established Member
Joined
15 Nov 2011
Messages
3,851
Location
St Neots
Usually meaning the number to be made, e.g.:
4 off widget type A
12 off widget type B

and often combined with "no.", short for "number":
8no. off widget type C

Maybe coming from off the order list, or off the production line?

But why is the correct "4 of" and "12 of" not used?
 

DelW

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2015
Messages
3,879
But why is the correct "4 of" and "12 of" not used?
I don't know how or why "X off" originated, other than the suggestions in my last post. But it's quite widely used, so it's not a mistake.
 

dosxuk

Established Member
Joined
2 Jan 2011
Messages
1,765
I don't know how or why "X off" originated, other than the suggestions in my last post. But it's quite widely used, so it's not a mistake.

As you say, it's absolutely not incorrect to use this form. According to the New York Times, it derives from one-off.

The off in one-off does not, in fact, stem from some corruption of the word of. Rather, this British usage of off typically appears with a number to indicate a quantity of items produced in some manufacturing process. The Oxford English Dictionary, Safire notes, takes this back to a 1934 quotation from the Proceedings of the Institute of British Foundrymen: "A splendid one-off pattern can be swept up in a very little time." Other numbers can fit the bill, as in the O.E.D.'s 1973 example of an advertisement for "Kienzle printers, 6 off, surplus to manufacturing requirements."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top