• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Local rag reports line closed due to slurry, reality wildly different.

Status
Not open for further replies.

atillathehunn

Established Member
Joined
6 Jan 2010
Messages
1,439
Location
NL
Among the more unusual reasons for a line closure?? For unknown reasons a farmer reversed his tractor and trailer down the station approach ramp and unleashes the slurry.

A RAILWAY line was blocked after a farmer emptied a slurry tank into a flooded station car park in Northwich.

The West Coast Main Line was closed between Warrington and Crewe following the ‘brazen’ act at Hartford Station.

Video footage of the incident showed a tractor towing a trailer reversing into the entrance to the car park before thousands of litres of ‘filthy liquid’ were released onto the access road and train tracks below.
Apparently it's not slurry, but flood water. Unclear if it resulted in the closure of the WCML.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

LOL The Irony

On Moderation
Joined
29 Jul 2017
Messages
5,335
Location
Chinatown, New York
Among the more unusual reasons for a line closure?? For unknown reasons a farmer reversed his tractor and trailer down the station approach ramp and unleashes the slurry.


Apparently it's not slurry, but flood water. Unclear if it resulted in the closure of the WCML.
What a selfish (you can fill in the blanks). May they feel the full force of the book hitting them in the face.

EDIT: Turns out the reporter jumped the gun and didn't obtain the full facts.
 
Last edited:

atillathehunn

Established Member
Joined
6 Jan 2010
Messages
1,439
Location
NL
What a selfish (you can fill in the blanks). May they feel the full force of the book hitting them in the face.
So apparently this is flood water and was told to dump there - but if it resulted in the closure of the line and caused damage then have to question why.
 

Mojo

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
7 Aug 2005
Messages
20,438
Location
0035
One of the comments on the article said that someone from Network Rail told him to put it there.
 

peters

On Moderation
Joined
28 Jul 2020
Messages
916
Location
Cheshire
One of the comments on the article said that someone from Network Rail told him to put it there.

If that's the case why hasn't some from Network Rail removed the same story for the press release section of their own website?


Newsquest sites are full of copy and paste articles but Network Rail can't blame one for putting out inaccurate information, when they wrote the press release and still have it live on their site!
 

holl1984

Member
Joined
14 Jan 2014
Messages
53
These farmers saved our town. They are still there now. They wernt asked to, they just did it. Some of them were there over 25 hours straight pumping the water, saving houses and businesses. They claim network rail told them but I and many other suspect Cheshire west and Chester council may have had something to do with it.

these farmers are hero’s in all of this.

this whole article has stemmed from a local residents post on a local page and a lot of people putting 2 and 2 together and making anything but 4
 

peters

On Moderation
Joined
28 Jul 2020
Messages
916
Location
Cheshire
There's a quote on the Cheshire live article from a network rail source saying they did not give permission to dump the water, it's the WCML that was flooded at the time though. The local residents are adiment the farmer had permission off someone, but it wasn't network rail maybe an environmental or a CWAC employee.

The line through Hartford is the WCML. All services from Euston to Liverpool and Euston to Preston (and beyond) services go through Hartford, the Birmingham to Liverpool services stop there.

There were farmers using tractors in the town centre to clear water, which would have been under the supervision of the Environment Agency, United Utilities and Cheshire West & Chester council.
 

holl1984

Member
Joined
14 Jan 2014
Messages
53
The police were using the farmers and tractors as part of there pumping efforts yesterday which suggests that someone most certainly knew what they were doing. If not network rail then someone else.
 

Baxenden Bank

Established Member
Joined
23 Oct 2013
Messages
4,045
I fail to see how 'reverse into the railway station and tip the contents down someone else's road and onto a railway line' can possibly be an instruction from any person holding any kind of responsibility.

I saw the video clip in my twitter feed and assumed the tractor driver had some beef about floodwater coming onto his land from the railway and thought it was an appropriate way to 'get his own back'. That it was done under formal instruction (if it actually was) beggars belief.
 

323235

Established Member
Joined
8 Dec 2007
Messages
2,079
Location
North East Cheshire
I'm surprised at the tone that the Northwich Guardian were taking over it given recent events in the town and I think the route directors statement was unusually inappropriate given they didn't know the facts and the weather we've had recently (this isn't someone running across a crossing whilst the barriers are down in front of a train). I think they will perhaps regret the words and tone used if it is found the tractor driver was working under instruction of the environment agency and council.
 

Whistler40145

Established Member
Joined
30 Apr 2010
Messages
5,932
Location
Lancashire
I wonder how the Tractor driver would feel if someone sprayed thousands of gallons of liquid **** through his letterbox
 

PG

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
2,890
Location
at the end of the high and low roads
I'm surprised at the tone that the Northwich Guardian were taking over it given recent events in the town and I think the route directors statement was unusually inappropriate given they didn't know the facts and the weather we've had recently (this isn't someone running across a crossing whilst the barriers are down in front of a train). I think they will perhaps regret the words and tone used if it is found the tractor driver was working under instruction of the environment agency and council.
FWIW the reporter who is credited with writing that article has received adverse comment.
Did any farmers come to your aid after that very misleading article you wrote? Know the facts before you write an article
 

185

Established Member
Joined
29 Aug 2010
Messages
5,041
A lot of comment suggesting that "Network Rail" gave permission to drop the slurry / wastewater / whatever down the road ramp at Hartford.

As Network Rail are not the station operator or managing landowner (the TOC are) - Mr Network Rail would not be allowed to grant that permission, suggesting the usual local rag public commentators are being as accurate as always. Surprised they didn't also try blame Cyclists, Travellers, the cost of car parking and err 'persons in unlit car parks at night flashing headlights' as per usual.

Whilst it's probably an error of judgement, I'm imagining our reporter Mr Partridge on his canal boat being hit by a deceased cow from an overbridge.
 
Last edited:

richw

Veteran Member
Joined
10 Jun 2010
Messages
11,257
Location
Liskeard
I wonder how the Tractor driver would feel if someone sprayed thousands of gallons of liquid **** through his letterbox
Try reading the whole thread including the update. You’ll realise your comment isn’t accurate as it was actually flood water he’d pumped from round the town and he was emptying it where he was instructed to by someone of authority
 

Whistler40145

Established Member
Joined
30 Apr 2010
Messages
5,932
Location
Lancashire
Try reading the whole thread including the update. You’ll realise your comment isn’t accurate as it was actually flood water he’d pumped from round the town and he was emptying it where he was instructed to by someone of authority
Local rag at it's best lol
 

dubscottie

Member
Joined
4 Apr 2010
Messages
922
Indeed so - commonly known as Fake News.
Yes.. Every single item in the press is false. But anything on Facebook etc is 100‰ true.
Sure Doris down the road posted it and her nephew knows a guy whose sister goes out with a bloke that went to school with the guy that sold the tractor to a farmer that's gone bust so he sold it to the council and they sold that to an unknown bloke from Norway and he dumped the water on the line.

The plots on Allo Allo were simpler.
 

Energy

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2018
Messages
4,543
and he was emptying it where he was instructed to by someone of authority
Seems like a lack of communication or just a 'not my problem' from the local authority by telling the farmers to dump it at the station without telling NR. Unfortunately sending flood water to the railways (or just not fixing the road which is dumping it on the tracks) isn't that uncommon as it is NR who deal with it instead of the local council.
 

Baxenden Bank

Established Member
Joined
23 Oct 2013
Messages
4,045
Perhaps the tractor driver was under the impression that he had permission from a relevent authority.
Perhaps the Network Rail Route Director responded hastily, not knowing that one of his staff had given permission.

I'm sure it will be investigated and resolved.

I'm sure that the Environment Agency and Local Authority have various emergency powers to deal with immediate threats to property and life. Whether instructing an uninsured third party contractor to dump waste material of unknown composition onto third party land without supervision and where members of the public may be present and unaware of said dumping is one of those powers I know not.

As this thread is starting to read like the public comments site on all local rags, I'm out.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top