• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

LU/Elizabeth Line 4G update

Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

mrmartin

Member
Joined
17 Dec 2012
Messages
1,145
Does anyone know if the tunneled section of the east London line of the overground will also gain 4G coverage as part of this project?
From what I remember last time I was on it, it's only really Wapping, Shadwell and Whitechapel that have signal issues there. Canada water has coverage in the station now. Whitechapel will be covered by tube coverage I would assume too. So it's really only 2 stations and a fairly short length of track in-between the underground stations.

The good thing about 4g compared to WiFi is it is usually a lot faster to reconnect at stations. The tube WiFi was awful for that, by the time it had reconnected (even on the SIM.based auth SSIDs) you'd have left the station again.
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
29,423
Location
UK
The good thing about 4g compared to WiFi is it is usually a lot faster to reconnect at stations. The tube WiFi was awful for that, by the time it had reconnected (even on the SIM.based auth SSIDs) you'd have left the station again.

Yes, this is a pain when you're on a train and using the station stops to get back online for a bit. Better than nothing, but Wi-Fi isn't ideal for that. Indeed, roaming from AP to AP is still not seamless even on the latest Wi-Fi standards, and your device has to make a decision on when to seek to move (even if the AP can set parameters to encourage it). If you simply eject a user once the signal drops to a certain level, to try and force it to re-register, that just results in more problems.

Wi-Fi certainly works best when you aren't moving much (in relation to the AP). Hence a good mobile DAS in a place like an airport or shopping centre is preferable to loads of APs to cover the same area - given people are likely walking a lot.
 

Gigabit

Member
Joined
7 Dec 2022
Messages
221
Location
United Kingdom
Does anyone know if they plan to supplement macro coverage on outdoor sections?

For example the District Line is poor outside Wimbledon and East Putney but is outdoors, are they going to remedy this with the Tube 4G rollout?
 

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
9,317
Location
London
Sorry, bit confused. Are people saying the Elizabeth Line has Wi-Fi in the tunnels?

There is. There's meant to be a public one (actual live date being pushed back), and a staff one that is in use, but even that is patchy.
 

Gigabit

Member
Joined
7 Dec 2022
Messages
221
Location
United Kingdom
Last edited:

JonnyM

Member
Joined
4 Jun 2022
Messages
86
Location
Morden, Surrey
Does anyone know if they plan to supplement macro coverage on outdoor sections?

For example the District Line is poor outside Wimbledon and East Putney but is outdoors, are they going to remedy this with the Tube 4G rollout?
It will be interesting to see what TfL decide for the covered sections of the District/Circle and Met lines. In some sections reception is passable but others non-existent. I’ve not seen any information about the plans with TfL concentrating on tube lines.
 

rebmcr

Established Member
Joined
15 Nov 2011
Messages
3,924
Location
St Neots
It will be interesting to see what TfL decide for the covered sections of the District/Circle and Met lines. In some sections reception is passable but others non-existent. I’ve not seen any information about the plans with TfL concentrating on tube lines.
The potential for the TfL antennas to 'leak' their signal to the surface is probably an additional headache for the engineers to overcome.
 

MrJeeves

Established Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
28 Aug 2015
Messages
3,342
Location
Burgess Hill
The potential for the TfL antennas to 'leak' their signal to the surface is probably an additional headache for the engineers to overcome.
It wouldn't really matter. Leaky feeders for tunnels run at such low power that it's not a real concern. Probably just half a metre of ground (or even less, really) would completely attenuate the signal into being useless.

If the concern is the bits that are just below ground level but open to the outside, networks have solutions to prevent interference, similar to if there are two sites outside near each other.
 

matt_world2004

Established Member
Joined
5 Nov 2014
Messages
4,578
The potential for the TfL antennas to 'leak' their signal to the surface is probably an additional headache for the engineers to overcome.
Why would this matter the mobile phone companies paying for the concession aren't going to care if their customers outside the railway can use the signal
 

rebmcr

Established Member
Joined
15 Nov 2011
Messages
3,924
Location
St Neots
Why would this matter the mobile phone companies paying for the concession aren't going to care if their customers outside the railway can use the signal
The way that adjacent cells behave with each other is fairly meticulously orchestrated.
 

Gigabit

Member
Joined
7 Dec 2022
Messages
221
Location
United Kingdom
The networks can just prioritise macro coverage if needed, the architecture of the BAI system will be setup to push customers off at a very high relative signal strength
 

Energy

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2018
Messages
4,945
Exactly, seems a bit of waste money to main 3 separate systems that does the same job.
I don't work for any company involved so I can't confirm this but I'd expect the EL WiFi to be using the 4G/5G in the tunnels as backhaul which would be why it doesn't work in the tunnels yet. The trains already need a staff WiFi network and a connection for PIS and other train systems so the cost of a customer facing network isn't that high.
 

rebmcr

Established Member
Joined
15 Nov 2011
Messages
3,924
Location
St Neots
I don't work for any company involved so I can't confirm this but I'd expect the EL WiFi to be using the 4G/5G in the tunnels as backhaul which would be why it doesn't work in the tunnels yet. The trains already need a staff WiFi network and a connection for PIS and other train systems so the cost of a customer facing network isn't that high.
Similarly, Manchester Metrolink uses WiFi-based signalling, making it trivial to offer a secondary connection to customers.
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
29,423
Location
UK
The way that adjacent cells behave with each other is fairly meticulously orchestrated.

There are many ways to steer a handset to the right site(s) and I am sure you could even restrict some surrounding sites from handing off to each other. Sure it requires some work, but there are loads of parameters to manage sites in busy areas. Steering people to/from specific bands is also used to offer the best use of resources (e.g. only allowing a user on to 800MHz LTE as a last resort, so it can be 'reserved' for people indoors where they can't see other bands).
 

Lewlew

Member
Joined
15 Oct 2019
Messages
748
Location
London
I don't work for any company involved so I can't confirm this but I'd expect the EL WiFi to be using the 4G/5G in the tunnels as backhaul which would be why it doesn't work in the tunnels yet. The trains already need a staff WiFi network and a connection for PIS and other train systems so the cost of a customer facing network isn't that high.
Why do they need a staff WiFi network? Ethernet port in the cab to plug a laptop in should suffice.
 

MrJeeves

Established Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
28 Aug 2015
Messages
3,342
Location
Burgess Hill
Indeed, Mornington Crescent was live for testing last weekend on Three when I visited to update my online map.

Guess that's just another bit to update this evening, too!
 

jon81uk

Member
Joined
17 Aug 2022
Messages
839
Location
Harlow, Essex
How confusing, so there's TfL Wi-Fi at stations and then separate Wi-Fi on the train as well? And then there will also be 4G in time, why so many options?

The on-train WiFi is on almost all National Rail trains, including London Overground. Nothing new to have it on Elizabeth Line too.
 

MrJeeves

Established Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
28 Aug 2015
Messages
3,342
Location
Burgess Hill
FWIW, I've updated my TfL mobile map to add Mornington Crescent, as well as additional info about how the deployment works and how the JLE and current deployment differs.

I hope to add more info about hardware and such too in the coming future.

 

JonnyM

Member
Joined
4 Jun 2022
Messages
86
Location
Morden, Surrey
FWIW, I've updated my TfL mobile map to add Mornington Crescent, as well as additional info about how the deployment works and how the JLE and current deployment differs.

I hope to add more info about hardware and such too in the coming future.

Thanks, an interesting update for the non-techie like me. I‘m surprised that Vodafone have deployed 3G as part of their roll out what with them switching it off elsewhere. I can’t see it lasting that long so I’m not sure why they bothered?

There was a press release from BAI several months ago proudly stating that the roll out on the Jubilee line was ‘complete’, but I’m surprised how complete given that it doesn’t yet have 5G and only half the line is still covered?

It’s good to see the way leaky feeders work in relation to the stations as well. I didn’t imagine it was like what was in the graphic and probably explains why someone who was using their phone for a voice call on the live Central line section was cut off mid way between the stations, much to his annoyance!

Does anyone know if they plan to supplement macro coverage on outdoor sections?

For example the District Line is poor outside Wimbledon and East Putney but is outdoors, are they going to remedy this with the Tube 4G rollout?


I've put in a FOI request to ask about coverage on the outdoor sections, will let you all know what the response is.

Did they come back with a reply? I’m pretty sure that all lines will eventually be covered because isn’t the roll out related to the Emergency Services Network that the government rolling out nationwide?
 
Last edited:

Gigabit

Member
Joined
7 Dec 2022
Messages
221
Location
United Kingdom
Reply from TfL on my FOI on District Line coverage out of tunnels.

Thank you for your request received by Transport for London (TfL) on 5th June 2023 asking for information about 4G connectivity on the London Underground.

Your request has been considered in accordance with the requirements of the Freedom of Information Act and our information access policy.



Specifically you asked:



Does TfL intend to provide 4G coverage on the District Line in outdoor sections where it is currently weak (for example outside of East Putney station towards Wimbledon), as part of the London Underground 4G project?”



I can confirm that we hold the information you require.



Any areas that are above ground fall outside of the scope of the project to bring high-speed mobile coverage to the Tube network. That said, we continually work with Mobile Network Operators (MNOs) and if there is demand from the MNOs we will look to support them in improving the service. However, we cannot do anything without the MNO’s agreement.



This recent Press Notice provides some more detail about the current project:

https://tfl.gov.uk/info-for/media/p...available-to-customers-at-camden-town-station



If this is not the information you are looking for please do not hesitate to contact me.

Must say I am very disappointed.
 

rebmcr

Established Member
Joined
15 Nov 2011
Messages
3,924
Location
St Neots
Reply from TfL on my FOI on District Line coverage out of tunnels.



Must say I am very disappointed.
At least they replied with the useful answer by saying "Any areas that are above ground"; rather than the unfriendly option which they could have chosen by just saying "Not at East Putney" or "Not on the District Line".
 

mrmartin

Member
Joined
17 Dec 2012
Messages
1,145
Weirdly I got (fully working!) signal on o2 (LTE800) on the escalators going from Elizabeth line to moorgate entrance today, which is very deep in at the bottom. Whether this was some pre switched on testing cell or maybe some weird signal from above via a ventilation shaft, I don't know, but it worked the entire length of both long escalators. Weirdly also got EE LTE1800 (not working, as I'm on o2!) cells showing up on the Northern Line platforms at moorgate.

Maybe something is going to be imminently switched on?
 

Top