• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Lumo - passenger experience criticised in Which? review

800001

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2015
Messages
5,194
The 2308 from Lumo from Newcastle to Morpeth on a weekday is popular as it lets you have a late one in Newcastle. I’ve got it on a few occasions and it is still well loaded.

Combined with LNER looking to stop less at Morpeth, Lumo does fill a gap.

Would there not be scope to run 2 x 5 car services? They would certainly fill them.
That’s why they have ordered extra trains for Lumo and HT. To operate some services as 10 car.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

styles

Member
Joined
7 Dec 2014
Messages
447
Location
Fife (the Kingdom)
Not necessarily, because adding extra cars will only lead to extra revenue where the existing trains are fully sold out, which I understand is by no means all of them. This is why proposals for extra cars anywhere commonly fail the financial test, it is extra cost without commensurately extra revenue.
I mean FG/Lumo have already confirmed they are going to add extra cars, so they clearly believe they'll make dough from it.
 

TPO

Member
Joined
7 Jun 2018
Messages
375
I’ve only travelled Lumo once and it was very different. I thought it was excellent, although I do recognise the author’s complaint about tired seats. Some of the upholstery hasn’t aged well. But the staff were excellent and the luggage restrictions are a good idea. I found it a lower BS option on that occasion then countless LNER trips, in first or standard.

Hmmm, the reporter should try a XC Voyager set on a long trip...... or a 170 with high-density seating. Those trains are VERY tired......

The attached article to me smacks of a trainee journalist re-hashing a load of stuff they've read online.
My mum uses Lumo between Morpeth and London a number of times a year, and she finds it a lot more reliable and seats more comfortable than LNER, let alone generally cheaper when booking in advance

Indeed, they need to get out more, try a ram-loaded XC Voyager from Plymouth-Edinburgh, or a XC 170 Nottingham-Cardiff. They would find out all about discomfort and would also be charged an extortionate fare, and it's 50:50 a trolley would be on, even if there was a trolley on they would most likely be walking to the trolley (not the trolley coming through) and the selection rather limited.

TPO
 

ejstubbs

Member
Joined
19 May 2016
Messages
218
Location
Scotland
Which? is an organisation with a declining reputation and reach.

I agree that reputation of the magazine has declined in recent decades*, but as far as the 'reach' of its owner is concerned, The Consumers Association has a number of special legal powers and involvement in regulatory functions which have been granted by legislation over the years - see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Which?#Legal_powers.

I find it rather worrying that an organisation whose primary revenue-earning publication is quite widely regarded as being of questionable accuracy, objectivity and usefulness should retain such statutory powers and influence.

FWIW, I think a good case could be made for Martin Lewis (of moneysavingexpert.com) being more effective in championing consumer rights these days.

* I've never been particularly impressed with it. Even way back in the 1970s I remember their group tests regularly declaring a particular product to be the best in its class, only to find out all too often that the model in question was no longer on the market by the time the magazine actually dropped through your letterbox. I think the straw that broke the camel's back for me was when Motoring Which? criticised a Porsche 911 for having a small boot. That's a bit like complaining that a gold necklace is "a bit on the heavy side".
 

NorthOxonian

Established Member
Associate Staff
Buses & Coaches
Joined
5 Jul 2018
Messages
1,525
Location
Oxford/Newcastle
The 2308 from Lumo from Newcastle to Morpeth on a weekday is popular as it lets you have a late one in Newcastle. I’ve got it on a few occasions and it is still well loaded.

Combined with LNER looking to stop less at Morpeth, Lumo does fill a gap.

Would there not be scope to run 2 x 5 car services? They would certainly fill them.
Likewise I've rarely found many empty seats on the Saturday evening Edinburgh to Newcastle - at 2056, it's almost an hour later than LNER's last service. Largely it is well used for journeys between the two cities but you do get some connecting from further afield (I've certainly used it for this when visiting parts of the west of Scotland for the day!).

I can't say I've ever had a bad experience on that train either - though it's admittedly quite different from Lumo's usual long distance fare. Catering isn't really relevant, very few passengers have luggage as it's more getting Saturday day trippers home, and expectations aren't necessarily as high. I think a lot of people would rather have a mediocre (but good value) 2056 train than an expensive all bells and whistles 2000...
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
103,801
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
I can't say I've ever had a bad experience on that train either - though it's admittedly quite different from Lumo's usual long distance fare. Catering isn't really relevant, very few passengers have luggage as it's more getting Saturday day trippers home, and expectations aren't necessarily as high. I think a lot of people would rather have a mediocre (but good value) 2056 train than an expensive all bells and whistles 2000...

But then what's happening there is Lumo being used as a fast regional service rather akin to the Javelin services. On which there is limited luggage capacity and it's fine because hardly anyone brings any, and on which the seats could be high density (but aren't) because most journeys are short.

Comfort, catering and luggage space are more of importance on longer distance trains. Though technically Lumo's luggage rules, if enforced strictly, would mean people with a few shopping bags from such a day trip being turned away...
 

supervc-10

Member
Joined
4 Mar 2012
Messages
730
Except with Ryanair you don't. You can, at a price, purchase them pretty much up to the same level of service (better in some cases) than a traditional full-service airline - you can purchase a checked bag and a second full size carryon, you can purchase seat selection and legroom and you can purchase a pretty good range of food and drinks. Lumo is a slightly different model - same for everyone, no buy-ups bar a Twix and a coffee and that's if the trolley gets to you.
I get what you mean, but that's kind of what I was trying to get at! To get those headline low fares, you're flying basic on Ryanair (and I love them for it)

I do think though that a lack of seat selection on their site is a bit of a own goal though, something that's easily chargeable for. Would definitely be easy to charge for a table of 4, and I would imagine many families would be happy to do that. Could also do a system like Ryanair do where if you pre-pay for allocated seating, you can pick where you are, but if you want to save money, you only receive the allocation nearer the time and might be separated if travelling together. The only issue there would be making sure that families with young kids aren't separated apart.
 

800001

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2015
Messages
5,194
I get what you mean, but that's kind of what I was trying to get at! To get those headline low fares, you're flying basic on Ryanair (and I love them for it)

I do think though that a lack of seat selection on their site is a bit of an own goal though, something that's easily chargeable for. Would definitely be easy to charge for a table of 4, and I would imagine many families would be happy to do that. Could also do a system like Ryanair do where if you pre-pay for allocated seating, you can pick where you are, but if you want to save money, you only receive the allocation nearer the time and might be separated if travelling together. The only issue there would be making sure that families with young kids aren't separated apart.
Lumo have introduced seat selector. (Website only not app)

Have a preferred seat? You can now choose your seat when booking a Lumo service direct through our website! Our Seat Picker tool allows you to select your seat onboard, explore our facilities, and sit together with your group. Please note that this tool is only available on our website and not the LumoGo app. If you book your tickets through the app, you will automatically be assigned a seat based on your preferences.
 

aar0

Member
Joined
13 Sep 2016
Messages
423
Regarding comfort, packing passengers in is basically their core business, and with the ironing board seats and limited legroom, this won't shift much.
Obviously comfort is subjective, but as a leggy 6’ 6”er I had no problems at all with Newcastle to London last year. Preferable to standard on LNER, and substantially cheaper. Limited stops and arrived a few minutes early.
 

styles

Member
Joined
7 Dec 2014
Messages
447
Location
Fife (the Kingdom)
Obviously comfort is subjective, but as a leggy 6’ 6”er I had no problems at all with Newcastle to London last year. Preferable to standard on LNER, and substantially cheaper. Limited stops and arrived a few minutes early.
That's good to know. I'm quite short so legroom doesn't normally cause me issues. I didn't find comfort much better or worse than LNER personally. I normally book table seats on such journeys as I often have my laptop with me or whatever, so Lumo does win that one for me. But I tend to book my journeys far enough in advance that I secure a table seat.
 

mrmartin

Member
Joined
17 Dec 2012
Messages
1,136
Lumo esque service offerings are definitely the future of long distance train travel. While I'm sure many won't want to hear this; it's exactly what happened to short haul European airlines which went from 0% LCC to >50% low cost in the space of a couple of decades. You can see it all over the EU now as well.

The moves from the DfT to reducing ticketing flexibility (eg LNER) imo make it more likely this will happen. As air carriers have found out, once you are being compared on Skyscanner etc then cheapest flight nearly always wins. I know a few people that travel Edinburgh to London and visa versa mainly for leisure and they tended to previously buy a super off peak return. Now that flexibility has steadily eroded they all use Trainline or similar and choose the cheapest advance with suitable times, which is often lumo (and as others have pointed out I suspect lumo massively underestimated demand and could offer much more aggressive fares with more seats and still be more profitable).

It's going to be super interesting to see how GWR get on. If they have some pre 9am arrivals on Lumo "South West" into London I suspect they will be spectacularly busy compared to the anytime fares GWR "offer".

I also suspect the DfT will get their hand forced slightly in keeping open access, because it's a good news story for the government when new trains and services get offered and it doesn't cost the govt any money. But let's see.
 

Zomboid

Member
Joined
2 Apr 2025
Messages
190
Location
Oxford
Lumo esque service offerings are definitely the future of long distance train travel. While I'm sure many won't want to hear this; it's exactly what happened to short haul European airlines which went from 0% LCC to >50% low cost in the space of a couple of decades. You can see it all over the EU now as well.

The moves from the DfT to reducing ticketing flexibility (eg LNER) imo make it more likely this will happen. As air carriers have found out, once you are being compared on Skyscanner etc then cheapest flight nearly always wins. I know a few people that travel Edinburgh to London and visa versa mainly for leisure and they tended to previously buy a super off peak return. Now that flexibility has steadily eroded they all use Trainline or similar and choose the cheapest advance with suitable times, which is often lumo (and as others have pointed out I suspect lumo massively underestimated demand and could offer much more aggressive fares with more seats and still be more profitable).

It's going to be super interesting to see how GWR get on. If they have some pre 9am arrivals on Lumo "South West" into London I suspect they will be spectacularly busy compared to the anytime fares GWR "offer".

I also suspect the DfT will get their hand forced slightly in keeping open access, because it's a good news story for the government when new trains and services get offered and it doesn't cost the govt any money. But let's see.
I think it's definitely a part of the future, but low cost hasn't killed "full service" in the airline sphere, and I don't think it ever will. Plus, there will always be people wanting to make use of the flexibility of tickets that don't specify a train, and the ability to buy a walk up fare.

Striking that balance is where the DfT have their work cut out.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
103,801
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
I think it's definitely a part of the future, but low cost hasn't killed "full service" in the airline sphere, and I don't think it ever will. Plus, there will always be people wanting to make use of the flexibility of tickets that don't specify a train, and the ability to buy a walk up fare.

And those people will pay more (though the question is how much more), and may switch to the car if that offering is removed as the car is fully flexible.

One of the aspects of the LNER trial is that it covers very long journeys of which there are few in the UK that are just a bit far to drive for most - unusually for these journeys air (with high fares and no flexibility) is the norm. Apply the same* thing to London to Birmingham and I'm not sure people will like it.

* Noting that Northern's Advances are basically fixed fare inflexible walk up tickets - the price doesn't substantially go up near departure nor is availability particularly limited so you just buy one when you know which train to catch, which isn't anything like LNER's scheme.
 

Zomboid

Member
Joined
2 Apr 2025
Messages
190
Location
Oxford
And those people will pay more (though the question is how much more), and may switch to the car if that offering is removed as the car is fully flexible.

One of the aspects of the LNER trial is that it covers very long journeys of which there are few in the UK that are just a bit far to drive for most - unusually for these journeys air (with high fares and no flexibility) is the norm. Apply the same* thing to London to Birmingham and I'm not sure people will like it.

* Noting that Northern's Advances are basically fixed fare inflexible walk up tickets - the price doesn't substantially go up near departure nor is availability particularly limited so you just buy one when you know which train to catch, which isn't anything like LNER's scheme.
There are some flows where mostly advance tickets would make sense, but for London - Birmingham (as an example) alternatives need to be available.
But let's stop there before we drag the thread down a rabbit hole that's probably already been well used...
 

styles

Member
Joined
7 Dec 2014
Messages
447
Location
Fife (the Kingdom)
I mean the service that allowed you to order food.
Ah yes I believe that was discontinued months ago. The pre-order website doesn't have a valid certificate any more and the only reference to pre-order is in the passenger charter (which I expect they just haven't remembered to update, or they have some convoluted process for doing so).
 

Top