• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

M1 junctions around Watford (no lights)

Status
Not open for further replies.

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
15,220
Location
St Albans
A little OT (sorry) but I drove some roadworks on the M74 in Scotland recently, and they had a signed 30mph limit on them, for about 3-4 miles. There was no work going on (well, nothing obvious) but there were average speed cameras. I‘d be interested to know what determines the temporary speed limit through roadworks, as I’ve now seen limits of 30, 40, 50, 60, and 70 (ie NSL) through motorway roadworks just thisyear.

Incidentally, 30mph on a near empty motorway is near impossible to keep to.
Then you probably remember when the M1 was 40mph average speed limit from J6-11 for 18 months in 2004-6 when the road was being made 4-lane. There were reports of thousands of speeding fines being handed out every month! It didn't bother me because I travelled from 9 to 10 only and there was only 1 camera between thoise two junctions so my average speed wouldn't be measured. ;)
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
32,025
Scotland just likes to be different.

The odd thing is, that further up the very same road were some more ‘intrusive’ roadworks, witha 50 limit.


Then you probably remember when the M1 was 40mph average speed limit from J6-11 for 18 months in 2004-6 when the road was being made 4-lane. There were reports of thousands of speeding fines being handed out every month! It didn't bother me because I travelled from 9 to 10 only and there was only 1 camera between thoise two junctions so my average speed wouldn't be measured. ;)

Oh yes I remember. I also remember Highways deciding to raise it to 50!
 

stuu

Established Member
Joined
2 Sep 2011
Messages
3,403
Incidentally, 30mph on a near empty motorway is near impossible to keep to.
The variable limits around the M4/M5 junction were set to 30 once for no obvious reason, so 4 lanes of fairly empty motorway... it felt like you could get out and walk faster
 

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
15,220
Location
St Albans
The odd thing is, that further up the very same road were some more ‘intrusive’ roadworks, witha 50 limit.




Oh yes I remember. I also remember Highways deciding to raise it to 50!
I think that was after a campaign in the local rags, where those that gamed the system ignored the displayed limit, got caught and whined afterwards.
 

DelW

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2015
Messages
4,710
A little OT (sorry) but I drove some roadworks on the M74 in Scotland recently, and they had a signed 30mph limit on them, for about 3-4 miles. There was no work going on (well, nothing obvious) but there were average speed cameras. I‘d be interested to know what determines the temporary speed limit through roadworks, as I’ve now seen limits of 30, 40, 50, 60, and 70 (ie NSL) through motorway roadworks just thisyear.

Incidentally, 30mph on a near empty motorway is near impossible to keep to.
I'm out of touch with current reg's, but it used to be the case that the separation measures needed between the work area and the live lanes varied with the signed speed. In my day, chapter 8 of the Traffic Signs Manual was the specification for temporary traffic management (it might still be?).

So for instance a single line of cones could only be used at the lowest speed, while for maximum speed substantial barriers (e.g. concrete "New Jersey" blocks or similar) were specified.

So the speed limit signed would depend (inter alia) on how much width there was available, and how practical it was to install and remove all the equipment in the time available. It can be very time consuming and expensive to place and remove that sort of quantity of stuff over several miles of road.
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
26,614
Location
Nottingham
It can be very time consuming and expensive to place and remove that sort of quantity of stuff over several miles of road.
And also hazardous to the workforce. I think that's why they tend to go for very long roadworks where not much seems to be happening over much of the length - less setting out and taking up of segregation measures.
 

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
15,220
Location
St Albans
And also hazardous to the workforce. I think that's why they tend to go for very long roadworks where not much seems to be happening over much of the length - less setting out and taking up of segregation measures.
Maybe the practice of doubling speeding penalties through live roadworks (as is done in the US) would help focus the minds of those who think that their driving is so perfect that they can make their own rules.
 

blueberry11

Member
Joined
19 Aug 2023
Messages
140
Location
Norwich
And also hazardous to the workforce. I think that's why they tend to go for very long roadworks where not much seems to be happening over much of the length - less setting out and taking up of segregation measures.
I thought that's why we increasingly do road closures instead of lane closures now. I was thinking its because of increased safety regulations. Additionally, its so that they can get the work done quicker in 8 hours rather than days of cones. But still, I remember being on the M4 outside of Reading with miles of cones (a lane 1 closure) and no workers in sight.
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
26,614
Location
Nottingham
Maybe the practice of doubling speeding penalties through live roadworks (as is done in the US) would help focus the minds of those who think that their driving is so perfect that they can make their own rules.
From what I've seen (which I note excludes the M25), speed compliance is pretty good, at least on those roadworks with advertised average speed cameras.
I thought that's why we increasingly do road closures instead of lane closures now. I was thinking its because of increased safety regulations. Additionally, its so that they can get the work done quicker in 8 hours rather than days of cones. But still, I remember being on the M4 outside of Reading with miles of cones (a lane 1 closure) and no workers in sight.
It probably depends on the works and the road. Most of the M69 was closed last weekend south-westbound, but it's normally pretty empty so nobody will miss it much. With something like the M1 you're probably limited to an overnight closure unless the work is truly exceptional, so unless it can be finished in a few hours everyone has to pack up and come back the next day. It's kind of the reverse of a railway blockade.
 

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
15,220
Location
St Albans
From what I've seen (which I note excludes the M25), speed compliance is pretty good, at least on those roadworks with advertised average speed cameras. .
I have no problem with average speed enforcement although when returning from Essex nearly two weeks ago, there were streams of trucks passing the other traffic doing (probably) just over 60 mph in the outside lane.
In general as you say, compliance in average speed areas is quite good, but there are still the occasional :rolleyes: twits that charge through other traffic only to slam on the brakes when they pass the cameras.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
32,025
I have no problem with average speed enforcement although when returning from Essex nearly two weeks ago, there were streams of trucks passing the other traffic doing (probably) just over 60 mph in the outside lane.
In general as you say, compliance in average speed areas is quite good, but there are still the occasional :rolleyes: twits that charge through other traffic only to slam on the brakes when they pass the cameras.

What frustrates me in average speed camera areas through Motorway roadworks is people not payng attention and sitting in the outside lane at an indicated 3-5mph under the limit (which is really 5-8mph under the limit).

Almost as bad is those who are equally not paying attention and seemingly unable to do a near constant speed. This seems to be generally cars which have cruise control!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top