• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Manchester - Sheffield passenger Capacity

Killingworth

Established Member
Joined
30 May 2018
Messages
5,653
Location
Sheffield
Carrying the story forward from the Hope Valley Capacity Scheme thread. That had it's roots in antiquity, to the time when electrified passenger services ceased on 5th January 1970 between Manchester and Sheffield Victoria over Woodhead. That left the Hope Valley route to cope alone, by then reduced to a basic one train an hour and a few extras. The stopping service didn't go all the way and ran a basic 2 hourly service at best. Weekend services were worse. It seems few travelled between Sheffield and Manchester, far more to Leeds and London. But things have changed, at first for the worse, but gradually they've been getting better .

Only 3 regular trains an hour were crossing the complex Dore Station Junctions from the 4 tracked Sheaf Valley out of Sheffield. By 1969 all stopping services between Sheffield and Derby were withdrawn and the stations and over bridges mostly demolished. British Railways didn't only close branch lines. They were incentivised with grants to reduce track mileages to save on maintenance. Points had to go too, so the 4 tracks laid down the Sheaf Valley in 1900-04 were reduced back to 2. By the early 1980s rail travel looked doomed. The passenger number figures were heading only one way, down.

So it was deduced that by slewing tracks down the Sheaf Valley, simplifying further Dore Station Junction and singling the active tracks through Dore & Totley station to Dore West Junction it should cut about a minute off Midland mainline express times between Sheffield and Chesterfield. In early 1985 the engineering job was done.

On the other side of the Pennines the Hazel Grove chord was opened in May 1986 thus allowing speeded up journey times. The left and right hands of BR were pulling in opposite directions!

Meanwhile, elsewhere in British Railways marketing of Inter-City was beginning to have effect. In 1985 passenger numbers stopped falling and in 1986 they'd started to go back up, although that took a few years to be confirmed as a sustained trend. By the mid 1990s the singling through Dore was seen to have been a mistake. Cement and limestone aggregate train loads out of the Peak District were increasing and additional 'fast' passenger services were being added. Dore was starting it's new role as Sheffield South Parkway for Manchester bound commuters! It's possible that Railtrack picked up the first drafts of a British Railways redoubling plan when they were formed in 1994. They certainly had it in their plans for delivery in 2003/4 and Sheffield City Council delivered an enlarged car park to match anticipated increased demand in 2013 (full every weekday within 6 months).

So here we are. London and Leeds are certainly not the most booked destinations from Sheffield. (Sheffield isn't even the most booked destination from Dore either.) It's all about Manchester.

Here are the top 5 booked destinations from Sheffield in 2019-20, before Covid, and the most recent for 2022-23,

1728312451681.png and for Dore & Totley 1728312819820.png

Capacity is a very big issue, but so is reliability.

Currently both TPE and EMR run alternating hourly services via Stockport all day, Northern stopping all day hourly via Marple making a combined 3 trains an hour.

There are effectively 3 classes of service available.

First class hourly with TPE where you may get catering but more likely not as the trolley will only serve one half of a 6 coach Class 185 train- if that runs. If 3 the trolley may not get through the congested train.
Standard class half hourly combined TPE/EMR. Same difficulty with catering on a 6 car TPE train, and also for EMR if operating 4, 5 or 6 car Class 170s.
Economy class taking 20-25 minutes longer on Northern, usually 3 car 195s but stock can be randomly formed with 4 car 150/156 combinations or 2, 4, 5 or 6 car 195s.

The TPE services run from Cleethorpes to Liverpool and frequently experience delays east of Sheffield Midland and west of Manchester Piccadilly.

EMR services suffer similar difficulties beyond Sheffield from Nottingham and Norwich and also from Liverpool to Manchester.

Both fast operators are prone to blaming Northern stoppers for getting in their way. They in their turn may blame one for delaying them at one end only for them to be delaying the other later. Observation suggests it's a classic case of 6 of one against half a dozen of the others, with some freight added in!

The net result is that increasing numbers appear to be taking the stoppers from end to end attracted by cheaper fares in a modern train that only takes 20-25 minutes longer. If it weren't for weekend cancellations this service would be even more popular.

Removal of TPE's Manchester Airport direct service (although the reversal at Piccadilly rather negated much of the benefit) has dented that market, but there's no shortage of luggage being shifted, evidenced by blocked doorways on all 3 operators trains.

Are more seats needed on the trains between the two cities? YES! Leisure is growing fast evidenced by the number of large wheeled cases, back packs and bikes trying to get aboard all 3 TOC's train.

Is more luggage and bike space needed? YES

Is another fast service required in 2024? Maybe not yet.

Why not? Lack of platform and track capacity from Stockport into and through Manchester plus similar issues from Dore into and through Sheffield. They could take 10 years to resolve.

But there are simple short term options to make a material difference.

TPE are already trying to increase more of their 185 train lengths to 6 car from December. For much of the day over large parts of the route 3 are quite adequate - the carting fresh air conundrum! (5 car would be more practical with walk through and less 1st class, but that's another story.)

EMR are now operating a number of 5 and 6 car 170s. Same issue regarding fresh air as TPE but those trains help. (Nevertheless I've seen their first westbound 6 car Sunday service stopping at Dore on the last 3 weekends - full and standing without taking on another 30.)

Northern could make their standard consist up to 4 car quite easily subject to availability. Far less fresh air to carry, but revenue protection would suffer on an unstaffed line!

That should do for starters.

Curious to note how many supporters of Man City and Man Utd and Liverpool travel from east of the Pennines!

 
Last edited:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Donny Dave

Established Member
Joined
9 Jul 2005
Messages
5,350
Location
Doncaster
Would an hourly semi fast service, calling at Dore & Totley, Hathersage, Hope, Chinley, Hazel Grove and Stockport work between Sheffield and Manchester? This would follow the EMR service from Sheffield. Also, is there any scope to interworking the Hope Valley services with those East of Sheffield?

An increase to 6 car TPE services throughout the day would be welcome, but platform extensions for need to be carried out elsewhere along the route. Are extensions at Grimsby possible by the way?
 

Killingworth

Established Member
Joined
30 May 2018
Messages
5,653
Location
Sheffield
Would an hourly semi fast service, calling at Dore & Totley, Hathersage, Hope, Chinley, Hazel Grove and Stockport work between Sheffield and Manchester? This would follow the EMR service from Sheffield. Also, is there any scope to interworking the Hope Valley services with those East of Sheffield?

An increase to 6 car TPE services throughout the day would be welcome, but platform extensions for need to be carried out elsewhere along the route. Are extensions at Grimsby possible by the way?

Although platform extensions at Meadowhall and to the east would be useful TPE operate Selective Door Opening so it isn't a major problem. They were stopping at previously 4 car Dore for many years. It does delay loading and unloading a little.

The Hope Valley stopper leaving Sheffield about 17.14 used to run through from Adwick. Probably the most unreliable train of the day as it picked up delays from Class 1 trains at Doncaster. TPE picks up delays from Doncaster so probably not a good move to push any more through the Nunnery corridor into Sheffield.

Keeping rolling stock and crew needs to a minimum and avoiding congestion from Stockport into or through Piccadilly there is a possible solution. There are 2 fast paths per hour. Adding a second semi fast as far as possible mirroring the current one is very feasible. How? By skip stopping down the Hope Valley using the current hourly New Mills stopper.

The current stopper requires 3 units and crews (on the service, although it needs a lot more than that to cover the full week). As far as I can tell the New Mills stopper requires 2 units with a long layover at New Mills. It might only require one extra unit and one extra crew.

Snags? Platform space at Sheffield. Dancing round freight services through the Hope Valley.

Advantages? Minimal extra resources.

Adding any totally new hourly services would require significantly more carriages and crews plus extra paths and platform space. At least 3? How could they avoid the Nunnery and Castlefield bottlenecks to go beyond Manchester or Sheffield?

So until all fasts are extended to 6, and stoppers to 4, and regularly filling, even extending that New Mills stopper may not be justified? Although it might, as a safety valve for when the fasts are cancelled, delayed or short formed!
 

Edgeley

Member
Joined
27 Jul 2017
Messages
104
Location
North West
As an aspiration (how practical in terms of pathing is another matter) you might introduce a fourth service per hour between Piccadilly and Sheffield and have say:

1 x non-stop, via Marple (TPE)
1 x call Stockport only (EMR)
1 x call all stations via Marple to Chinley, skip the five Hope Valley villages, then Dore and Sheffield (Northern)
1 x call Stockport, Hazel Grove, Chinley then all stations to Sheffield (Northern)
 

Class 170101

Established Member
Joined
1 Mar 2014
Messages
8,358
As an aspiration (how practical in terms of pathing is another matter) you might introduce a fourth service per hour between Piccadilly and Sheffield and have say:

1 x non-stop, via Marple (TPE)
1 x call Stockport only (EMR)
1 x call all stations via Marple to Chinley, skip the five Hope Valley villages, then Dore and Sheffield (Northern)
1 x call Stockport, Hazel Grove, Chinley then all stations to Sheffield (Northern)

Not sure why you would send TPE via Marple. Leave that in the hands of Northern and run TPE via Stockport
 

Killingworth

Established Member
Joined
30 May 2018
Messages
5,653
Location
Sheffield
As an aspiration (how practical in terms of pathing is another matter) you might introduce a fourth service per hour between Piccadilly and Sheffield and have say:

1 x non-stop, via Marple (TPE)
1 x call Stockport only (EMR)
1 x call all stations via Marple to Chinley, skip the five Hope Valley villages, then Dore and Sheffield (Northern)
1 x call Stockport, Hazel Grove, Chinley then all stations to Sheffield (Northern)
Goyt Valley users from Piccadilly to New Mills currently get a 2 trains per hour stopping service. They certainly wouldn't like that reduced permanently to one.

Currently most users on that line wanting to get to Leeds would consider going on the Sheffield stopper. If the New Mills stopper continued to Sheffield they'd probably always be better going via Sheffield. A much better interchange option there than across Manchester.
 

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
24,971
Location
Bolton
You could run all six cars between Doncaster and Liverpool Lime Street or between Cleethorpes and Manchester Piccadilly. If you did that you'd sacrifice the other parts of the route to shorter trains. Realistically fleet isn't going to cover all six car 185s on the South route because Hull and Redcar services are competing with them.
 

Killingworth

Established Member
Joined
30 May 2018
Messages
5,653
Location
Sheffield
You could run all six cars between Doncaster and Liverpool Lime Street or between Cleethorpes and Manchester Piccadilly. If you did that you'd sacrifice the other parts of the route to shorter trains. Realistically fleet isn't going to cover all six car 185s on the South route because Hull and Redcar services are competing with them.
Good idea, but where do you put the detached coaches and who shunts them?
 

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
24,971
Location
Bolton
Good idea, but where do you put the detached coaches and who shunts them?
You can't. You have to split the service and remove the through trains.

Alternatively continue to accept that the 185 fleet isn't big enough to be all things to all stakeholders.
 

Killingworth

Established Member
Joined
30 May 2018
Messages
5,653
Location
Sheffield
You can't. You have to split the service and remove the through trains.

Alternatively continue to accept that the 185 fleet isn't big enough to be all things to all stakeholders.
It's almost as quick between Sheffield and Grimsby via Gainsborough and Brigg but that's a digression/diversion too far!
 

Bevan Price

Established Member
Joined
22 Apr 2010
Messages
7,805
Back to 1970. It did not help passenger numbers when the comfortable loco hauled stock used on the Woodhead route was replaced on the Hope Valley by (mostly) 3 coach Metro Cammell dmus with 3+2 seating, and, at higher speeds, riding qualities that could be pretty dire. Things improved a bit when Class 123 & 124 dmus appeared, but they were past their best, and becoming a bit unreliable. It was the loco - hauled (mostly Class 31s) stock of the 1980s that started to improve services.
 

Edgeley

Member
Joined
27 Jul 2017
Messages
104
Location
North West
Not sure why you would send TPE via Marple. Leave that in the hands of Northern and run TPE via Stockport
Is via Marple not a quicker direct route from Sheffield to Manchester?

Goyt Valley users from Piccadilly to New Mills currently get a 2 trains per hour stopping service. They certainly wouldn't like that reduced permanently to one.
I was listing proposed end-to-end services. There could still be an additional Manchester - New Mills stopper.
 

magpiespy

Member
Joined
3 Nov 2020
Messages
37
Location
Manchester
I really enjoyed the Hope Valley capacity thread, good to see this one revving up nicely.

The Hope Valley is my favourite line, and I'm currently in the fortunate position of travelling on it once a month or so for work, with the occasional leisure trip to the smaller stations en route.

The discussion has already become very practical, with mentions of imported delays, lack of rolling stock, bottlenecks and so on, as is only right.

I would just like to mention that we are talking about the 3rd and 8th largest cities in the UK here. The terms of the debate should take this into account. The economic and social importance of this line, given the population at either end, is considerable.
 

Djgr

Established Member
Joined
30 Jul 2018
Messages
2,100
I really enjoyed the Hope Valley capacity thread, good to see this one revving up nicely.

The Hope Valley is my favourite line, and I'm currently in the fortunate position of travelling on it once a month or so for work, with the occasional leisure trip to the smaller stations en route.

The discussion has already become very practical, with mentions of imported delays, lack of rolling stock, bottlenecks and so on, as is only right.

I would just like to mention that we are talking about the 3rd and 8th largest cities in the UK here. The terms of the debate should take this into account. The economic and social importance of this line, given the population at either end, is considerable.
It might also be useful and interesting to think of a solution in a world without TOCs.
 

Dr Hoo

Established Member
Joined
10 Nov 2015
Messages
4,724
Location
Hope Valley
It might also be useful and interesting to think of a solution in a world without TOCs.
Interesting that the current ‘three TOC’ service pattern dates back to BR Regional Railways sub-sectors. North West on the stoppers, North East as the basis for what is now Cleethorpes-Liverpool and Central for Norwich-Liverpool.
 

Killingworth

Established Member
Joined
30 May 2018
Messages
5,653
Location
Sheffield
It might also be useful and interesting to think of a solution in a world without TOCs.
Before TOCs we had Pennine divides that continue to this day.

Network Rail signalling control has just moved from Dore West Junction to Earles Sidings controlled from York and Manchester respectively.

Northern run the stopping services from Manchester with different T&Cs for crews on the east side.

BR Midland Region kept the Hope Valley line stations open, albeit economising by demolishing the original station buildings and bringing in Paytrains. Eastern Region closed and demolished all the Sheaf Valley stations together with their two slow tracks. Millhouses at least would have been a viable station today, but the site is now too cramped by development.
 

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
24,971
Location
Bolton
I really enjoyed the Hope Valley capacity thread, good to see this one revving up nicely.

The Hope Valley is my favourite line, and I'm currently in the fortunate position of travelling on it once a month or so for work, with the occasional leisure trip to the smaller stations en route.

The discussion has already become very practical, with mentions of imported delays, lack of rolling stock, bottlenecks and so on, as is only right.

I would just like to mention that we are talking about the 3rd and 8th largest cities in the UK here. The terms of the debate should take this into account. The economic and social importance of this line, given the population at either end, is considerable.
If it were up to me we'd have a grade separated junction at Hazel Grove and two 9 car EMUs on the expresses per hour, with two stopping services via Marple worked with conventional 8 car commuter sets. Obviously that'd take several years and it's totally unachievable without full 25kv and doubling the length of most platforms but clearly there'd be enough demand for it. I'd probably swap the Cleethorpes through service onto a 4 car using platform 0 at Doncaster though and double it to 2tph, with both calling at Thorne South and one calling at Crowle and Althorpe and the other Kirk Sandall and Hatfield & Stainforth.

Sadly it ain't up to me and the wailing and gnashing of teeth at losing direct trains between Sheffield and Grimsby would be huge, even with that tripling of capacity being on offer. I'd extend the footbridge at Doncaster so it connected directly to platform 8 with an additional lift and staircase (probably £3 million minimum just for that one single item). There is also the possibility that without a platform 9/10 at Doncaster this wouldn't fit.
 
Last edited:

jfollows

Established Member
Joined
26 Feb 2011
Messages
7,856
Location
Wilmslow
Is via Marple not a quicker direct route from Sheffield to Manchester?
There's nothing in it, pathing and not getting stuck behind slower trains is more significant.
1L21 21:37 Liverpool Lime Street - Nottingham 20 minutes start to pass Piccadilly to New Mills South Junction including a Stockport call
1L20 21:41 Manchester Piccadilly - Nottingham 22 minutes non-stop via Marple
If anything, the opposite is true, but I'd not want to make either case.
 

Attachments

  • Realtime Trains | 1L21 2137 Liverpool Lime Street to Nottingham | 08:10:2024.pdf
    128.3 KB · Views: 8
  • Realtime Trains | 1L20 2141 Manchester Piccadilly to Nottingham | 08:10:2024.pdf
    98.7 KB · Views: 5

185143

Established Member
Joined
3 Mar 2013
Messages
4,844
Running TPE via Marple would lead to exactly the same issues that they used to have pre 2018. The need to cross the Piccadilly station throat.

The main reason the Liverpool-Man Picc-Scarborough service was rerouted via Manchester Victoria on a permanent basis was to avoid exactly this. The train would have to cross from P13 to Ardwick Jn. Even a 2 minute delay would clash with the path of the xx:15 London Euston departure.

If TPE were to run via Marple permanently it couldn't be from Liverpool, or else you'd have the same problem. They even run in the same path the pre 2018 services did too off the Cheshire Lines route.
 

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
24,971
Location
Bolton
Wouldn’t be achievable without whole new earthworks for a start!
Probably one of the smallest things to solve with that particular idea, given currently almost none of the route is fitted with overhead wires and still relies on legacy signalling...
 

Senex

Established Member
Joined
1 Apr 2014
Messages
2,873
Location
York
It would probably be less difficult (note I didn't say "easier") to build a new connection across the valley somewhere further east.
One of the plans for a junction considered during the 30-odd years before WW2 when this scheme was first being aired was a variant leaving the Midland just after the L&NW bridge and taking a gentler and better-graded curve down to join the L&NW on the west side, over what was then all open land. That area is now completely built up.
When the present curve was built, it would still have been possible to build a double line between the Midland and the L&NW, single the latter from the Midland bridge and run it through a new third (back) platform at Hazel Grove (and SELNEC would have provided the flyover at Edgeley Junction).
But (a) who then foresaw the way traffics were going to develop, and (b) who was going to pay for anything better than the single-line chord that was provided? It was a major achievement of the Manchester Division to get even that in the climate of the times. This is one of those schemes that would have been so much better if it had been done when first thought of rather than many decades later.
How would a connection further east at Hazel Grove work without a couple of pretty nasty curves at the ends? Or are you thinking of a connection somewhere on the south side of Disley Tunnel?
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
26,610
Location
Nottingham
How would a connection further east at Hazel Grove work without a couple of pretty nasty curves at the ends? Or are you thinking of a connection somewhere on the south side of Disley Tunnel?
I didn't have a specific location in mind, but looking at the map it could only sensibly be done somewhere beyond the tunnel. It would need a new viaduct across the valley so far from straightforward but probably easier than bulldozing large parts of Hazel Grove.

Having said that, looking again it might be possible to run a westbound curve through the bus park and ride and the businesses across the road from it without touching any housing, but it would be pretty tight.
 

Killingworth

Established Member
Joined
30 May 2018
Messages
5,653
Location
Sheffield
Interesting to look back to the time the Hazel Grove chord was planned and built. There's some information here hidden away in archives accessed thanks to Google, see; https://uk.railway.narkive.com/2raOfFlr/hazel-grove-chord

The late Peter Fox went on to found Platform 5 publications and lived close to Dore & Totley station. (When BR reduced it to Dore he campaigned to get the full title back and for stops on the fast trains.) Crossing the throat at Piccadilly was a problem 50 years ago and still is!

This old thread contains interesting information, Hope Valley line services in the 1970s and 80s : https://www.railforums.co.uk/threads/hope-valley-line-services-in-the-1970s-and-80s.159318/
 
Last edited:

Class 170101

Established Member
Joined
1 Mar 2014
Messages
8,358
Is via Marple not a quicker direct route from Sheffield to Manchester?

There's nothing in it, pathing and not getting stuck behind slower trains is more significant.
1L21 21:37 Liverpool Lime Street - Nottingham 20 minutes start to pass Piccadilly to New Mills South Junction including a Stockport call
1L20 21:41 Manchester Piccadilly - Nottingham 22 minutes non-stop via Marple
If anything, the opposite is true, but I'd not want to make either case.

I would also add that TPE seems more useful via Stockport for connections to the south / southwest rather than being forced into Manchester Piccadilly to get there.
 

p1ash

Member
Joined
11 Oct 2011
Messages
13
The class 185s seem so restricted (due to not being able to use MU speeds) on the Hope Valley route compared to Diggle & Standedge. If the class 185s could do MU line speed, I wonder what the timing savings would be?
I suspect the same time savings would be generated by electrification?
 
Last edited:

Killingworth

Established Member
Joined
30 May 2018
Messages
5,653
Location
Sheffield
The class 185s seem so restricted (due to the speed restriction) on the Hope Valley route compared to Diggle & Standedge. If the class 185s could do MU line speed, I wonder what the timing savings would be?
I suspect the same time savings would be generated by electrification?
Curiously many TPE 185 paths through the Hope Valley are slower than EMR's 158/170s. Only a minute or two but all that power can't be fully used.
 

Halifaxlad

Established Member
Joined
5 Apr 2018
Messages
1,653
Location
The White Rose County
I would just like to mention that we are talking about the 3rd and 8th largest cities in the UK here. The terms of the debate should take this into account. The economic and social importance of this line, given the population at either end, is considerable.
It often used to annoy me that despite this, the line is overlook with more focus on Leeds to Manchester that already has 2 routes and the M62 to boot too.
 

Killingworth

Established Member
Joined
30 May 2018
Messages
5,653
Location
Sheffield
It often used to annoy me that despite this, the line is overlook with more focus on Leeds to Manchester that already has 2 routes and the M62 to boot too.
And me!

Sheffield suffers from its position in that railways passed it by both north to south and east to west. The canals did too, and the roads. The southern Pennines leave no easy gaps

Leeds developed as a hub for all 3 modes, surrounded by industrial activity on all sides. Sheffield was, and always will be, hemmed in by hills.

Not being from Leeds, Sheffield or Manchester (another city surrounded by thriving industry with many canals and motorways) I see why railway development differs considerably.

From the RailwayData/UK website, top 8 booked destinations from Sheffield and Leeds. As the Sheffield-Manchester services improve so will number.

Sheffield passenger numbers 2022-23.............................................................. Leeds passenger numbers 2022-23

Screenshot (1193).png Screenshot (1192).png
 

Top