GRALISTAIR
Established Member
Catterall Feeder is also being uprated.
Again true - but I thought this was also required as WCML Power supply being upgraded anyway to allow for Springs- Great Strickland going to auto-transformer etc
Catterall Feeder is also being uprated.
It's also a very long lead item (referring to how long before it needs to be ordered, not the length of the wire from Stalybridge to Ordsall Lane!). So once the contracts have been signed they might as well build it and make what use of it they can. There's a mention on another thread of one going ahead at Market Harborough despite that part of the MML having been Graylinged.True but a Grid Feeder takes a lot of planning and is expensive. At the minimum having the feeder in makes any future electrification massively easier and much easier to justify/business case wise - one less thing to do.
Hm I'm not sure this follows. This feeder is required to ensure there is sufficient power supply further west after the electrification of the Manchester - Preston section.
May 2018, but that's no more reliable than any of the other NW dates.Ah right. I thought that it wasn't needed for Manchester to Preston. As others have pointed out since, it will still help the business case. Bromley Street makes sense, its enough for trains to leave Victoria and re-enter using a different platform. What is the expected completion date?
Almost certainly because they've forgotten to update it to reflect the dropping of Bromley Street to Stalybridge from NW Phase 5.It's worth noting that further on in the document, the TPE section assumes that its electrification option begins at Stalybridge.
Almost certainly because they've forgotten to update it to reflect the dropping of Bromley Street to Stalybridge from NW Phase 5.
Almost certainly because they've forgotten to update it to reflect the dropping of Bromley Street to Stalybridge from NW Phase 5.
The TRU documentation also refers to NW Phase 5 including Stalybridge to Guide Bridge!
What does TRU stand for? Is it another name for the latest update to the Enhancements Delivery Plan?The TRU documentation also refers to NW Phase 5 including Stalybridge to Guide Bridge!
Almost everything I've seen in the last 3 years about the way this document gets "updated" suggests that it's done without anybody applying a "guiding mind" to check that it remains self-consistent. Bromley Street to Stalybridge has dropped out of the document leaving a hole. There are no masts up, and probably no bases, and no reason to believe any work towards electrifying it will be done in the remainder of CP5.Or is it because they have not been cancelled yet and therefore the eastern approach to Victoria is sort of phase 5a?
AKA Cut and Paste !-- the way this document gets "updated" suggests that it's done without anybody applying a "guiding mind" to check that it remains self-consistent.
-- Bromley Street to Stalybridge has dropped out of the document leaving a hole. There are no masts up, and probably no bases, and no reason to believe any work towards electrifying it will be done in the remainder of CP5.
What does TRU stand for? Is it another name for the latest update to the Enhancements Delivery Plan?
But the text states an assumption that OLE-only rolling stock is used, so how do they get from Victoria to Stalybridge?Apologies, its the Transpennine Route Upgrade the project which now includes all of the electrification and journey time improvement works for the Stalybridge to York/Selby project.
But the text states an assumption that OLE-only rolling stock is used, so how do they get from Victoria to Stalybridge?
Not the record holder - according to a quick look at the good book, ATS has eight meanings - that's as far as I got lookingPossibly the most notable example of an abbreviation with more than one meaning is S&C.
Class 769?But the text states an assumption that OCLE-only rolling stock is used, so how do they get from Victoria to Stalybridge?
Bses reported by the bay platforms at Vic. Same link as in the post above.
What appear to be bases for electrification masts have been reported on the approach to Victoria station and alongside one of the bay platforms.
When I referred to bases in June, I was remembering (and partly misremembering) a post by Freel07 on Skyscrapercity in April, with an embedded photograph showing yellow paint marks on the gravel:Which as a fairly regular user of the bay platforms, I thought a little odd, as I haven't spotted any new bases. Aren't these the same bases you reported in June?