a good off
Member
It is 40 years ago tonight since the joint line closed.
I seem to recall seeing a good website on it's final years not so long ago - can't find it now to link to.It is 40 years ago tonight since the joint line closed.
And one I really regret not travelingIt is 40 years ago tonight since the joint line closed.
I take it it's this signal you're referring to:40 years. Can remember travelling the route and going out to photograph locations before the line closed.
This year I walked from March station to Twenty Foot River and back. An interesting walk, trying to spot where the old yards used to be. There’s still some rusty signalling equipment hidden in the undergrowth in places. At Twenty Foot, the semaphore signal on the up line is still there. It must of been a welcome sight to March men knowing they were nearly home.....
I take it it's this signal you're referring to:
Old railway signal near March, Cambridgeshire
© Copyright Richard Humphrey and licensed for reuse under this Creative Commons Licence.
(Click on photo to go to the larger original on the Geograph website.)
Wow that makes me feel old!It is 40 years ago tonight since the joint line closed.
I did a few return trips between Cambridge and Lincoln in the last days of this line, bouncing and rattling along in the Cravens 105 DMUs which used to ply to and from Doncaster.My last trip on the March-Spalding line was on a Cambridge to Doncaster DMU. I was sitting in the rear saloon enjoying the panoramic views through the driving cab when, at March, a four-wheel van was hooked on the back, somewhat spoiling things.
March - Spalding (and indeed the Lincoln avoiding line) are very definitive examples of short-sighted closures. However, we cannot lose sight of the circumstances of the time - BR was severely cash strapped and had no leeway for expensive renewals on life-expired infrastructure where savings could be made. However, it was semaphore signalled with numerous level crossings, so whilst eye-wateringly expensive, we need to recognise that both the Peterborough remodelling and Werrington diveunder have effectively been built to replace this route, offering a slightly longer but conflict-free route from March through Spalding.Last week I saw that the March - Spalding section of the joint line was closed to save BR only £4 million in track renewal costs.
More recently, the Werrington Diveunder was constructed at a cost of over £200 million to alleviate the capacity impact on the ECML that the closure of March - Spalding had…
March - St Ives and Huntingdon - Cambridge could also do with reopening seeing as the “guided busway” is hardly fit for purpose
See also the Lincoln avoiding line. While the Joint Line is hardly complete anymore, the loss of March - Spalding along with Woodhead and the Settle - Carlisle at least contributed to making any further closures politically unacceptable from then onwards.
A bit problem of March / Spalidng is that is was around 20 miles of almost nothingess - hardly any local residents to use the railway.March - Spalding (and indeed the Lincoln avoiding line) are very definitive examples of short-sighted closures. However, we cannot lose sight of the circumstances of the time - BR was severely cash strapped and had no leeway for expensive renewals on life-expired infrastructure where savings could be made. However, it was semaphore signalled with numerous level crossings, so whilst eye-wateringly expensive, we need to recognise that both the Peterborough remodelling and Werrington diveunder have effectively been built to replace this route, offering a slightly longer but conflict-free route from March through Spalding.
I have to say, with the Lincoln avoiding line I have little sympathy when the local authority moans about the level crossing being closed for so much of the time - BR may have closed the route but the local planning authorities made no effort to safeguard the trackbed and it was substantially built over in no time at all. They reap what they sow!
Indeed, hence the early (pre-Beeching) closure of the intermediate stations. The sustainable function was to provide a link from East Anglia into the East Midlands via Lincolnshire and the modernised route via Peterborough and Wennington fulfils that function.A bit problem of March / Spalidng is that is was around 20 miles of almost nothingess - hardly any local residents to use the railway.
Given the nothingness served by the direct route as opposed to Peterborough March - Spalding has got to be about the best case scenario for closed lines not being reopened, but I don’t agree with the sentiment that it was life expired infrastructure that needed to be closed. I’m sure even the most comprehensive track and signalling renewal and even level crossing closures wouldn’t have constituted total re-engineering.March - Spalding (and indeed the Lincoln avoiding line) are very definitive examples of short-sighted closures. However, we cannot lose sight of the circumstances of the time - BR was severely cash strapped and had no leeway for expensive renewals on life-expired infrastructure where savings could be made. However, it was semaphore signalled with numerous level crossings, so whilst eye-wateringly expensive, we need to recognise that both the Peterborough remodelling and Werrington diveunder have effectively been built to replace this route, offering a slightly longer but conflict-free route from March through Spalding.
I have to say, with the Lincoln avoiding line I have little sympathy when the local authority moans about the level crossing being closed for so much of the time - BR may have closed the route but the local planning authorities made no effort to safeguard the trackbed and it was substantially built over in no time at all. They reap what they sow!
Wennington Junction being where the Furness and Midland Joint line left the Little North Western route to Lancaster Green Ayre.Indeed, hence the early (pre-Beeching) closure of the intermediate stations. The sustainable function was to provide a link from East Anglia into the East Midlands via Lincolnshire and the modernised route via Peterborough and Wennington fulfils that function.
Possibly not all. Gerry Fiennes wrote that in the 1950s one of the LNER approach-lit searchlight signals along the dead-straight line was notably late in switching on as the train approached, and loco crews used to take bets on what aspect it would light up at ...March - Spalding ... However, it was semaphore signalled with numerous level crossings
Last week I saw that the March - Spalding section of the joint line was closed to save BR only £4 million in track renewal costs.
More recently, the Werrington Diveunder was constructed at a cost of over £200 million to alleviate the capacity impact on the ECML that the closure of March - Spalding had…
March - St Ives and Huntingdon - Cambridge could also do with reopening seeing as the “guided busway” is hardly fit for purpose
March - Spalding (and indeed the Lincoln avoiding line) are very definitive examples of short-sighted closures. However, we cannot lose sight of the circumstances of the time - BR was severely cash strapped and had no leeway for expensive renewals on life-expired infrastructure where savings could be made.
The GN/GE Joint Line, and March to Cambridge via St Ives line, were primarily freight railways, especially movement of coal from the Nottinghamshire coalfields to London. Most of that traffic disappeared in the 1960s when the big baseload coal fired power stations at West Burton and Cottam opened and electricity was sent to London using high voltage power lines instead.Indeed, hence the early (pre-Beeching) closure of the intermediate stations. The sustainable function was to provide a link from East Anglia into the East Midlands via Lincolnshire and the modernised route via Peterborough and Wennington fulfils that function.
Thanks for this, always good to hear from someone who was there. I don't remember the temporary terminal at Ipswich: was it visible from passing passenger trains and can you remember how long it lasted?I was at Ipswich and Felistowe at the time , and about the only buoyant business hopes was the expansion of Felixstowe which container wise , blossomed. (new Walton Terminal being built and a "temporary" terminal was quickly established in the largely redundant Ipswich Lower yard with a road shuttle to the FX docks in order to provide an additional service (from Manchester Trafford Park) , pending expansion. So the expansion of Felixstowe was certainly happening and being planned for.
The considerable number of special Freightliner trains above the working plan , was always managed either direct via Bury to the ECML , or more often - via London and the GEML. March- Spalding would never have come into consideration.
Thanks for this, always good to hear from someone who was there. I don't remember the temporary terminal at Ipswich: was it visible from passing passenger trains and can you remember how long it lasted?
I was thinking of the speedlink air braked freights to/from Parkeston Quay for the European ferries as being the buoyant freight traffic in East Anglia around that time.
Keep going ... apart from track renewals the line had innumerable level crossings, in fact apart from ones adjacent to its bridge over the River Nene it didn't have a single road bridge in its length. This was a freight route with overnight traffic, where the crossings would be manned for three shifts. The operating costs must have been very considerable.Last week I saw that the March - Spalding section of the joint line was closed to save BR only £4 million in track renewal costs.
There are two separate issues here.Given the nothingness served by the direct route as opposed to Peterborough March - Spalding has got to be about the best case scenario for closed lines not being reopened, but I don’t agree with the sentiment that it was life expired infrastructure that needed to be closed. I’m sure even the most comprehensive track and signalling renewal and even level crossing closures wouldn’t have constituted total re-engineering.
Re: Thatcher-era BR’s financial situation, it was problematic that it had literally £0 available for such basic maintenance, which meant an inability to even keep the aforementioned lines open and with certainly no money to reopen them later, that the Property Board were left sitting on increasingly valuable parcels of land, in many cases ideally situated in what were now heavily built up town centres, the sale of which could fund BR’s continued operation in lieu of subsidy. The Lincoln avoiding line was certainly more valuable than March - Spalding in that respect. I note that Lincoln St Marks clung on for another few years before receiving the same fate.
Is the issue with the non-avoiding line a level crossing? I should know as I only went through there last week.
Wennington Junction being where the Furness and Midland Joint line left the Little North Western route to Lancaster Green Ayre.
The question is why isn’t there a through service from March - Spalding via Peterborough?
As a Fenlander born and bred I have to object to that!I do feel that this section -- although there is a "sensible" reason or two, for regret for its demise -- is for the lover of scenic and engaging-to-the-eye lines, one of the less woeful abandonments of the past half-century. Crossing dead-flat, sparsely inhabited Fen country -- in a fairly recent thread on these Forums, theme "most depressing stretches of the network": neighbouring lines, still in traffic, were nominated as scenically thoroughly depressing (and defended by other posters; including myself, "born and raised" in that area: but totally flat landscapes are overall, a minority taste).
I do agree with this - as someone from a more undulating area (sussex weald) I have to say I found the fens remarkable and very interesting indeed the 1st time I saw them and still do - like a mini US or Canadian great plains. I very much enjoy trips through it - sections east from Peterborough being appealing for this very reason.As a Fenlander born and bred I have to object to that!
For me there's something quite magical about the Fens on a cold and sunny winter's day, with long clear sightlines (especially to Ely Cathedral), big skies, spectacular sunsets and clouds of steam (and the smell) from the beet factories. Long shadows cast over deep valleys are far more depressing in comparison. And one of the best ways of appreciating the Fens on a cold and sunny winter's day was from the warmth of a Cravens DMU, especially from the seat behind the driver.