• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

MML Electrification: progress updates

Nottingham59

Established Member
Joined
10 Dec 2019
Messages
1,664
Location
Nottingham
Nevermind the increased track wear due to the increased weight of lugging a diesel engine and gen set around 100% of time.
Sure. And a battery EMU with a diesel range extender only needs a tiny diesel engine (about the size and weight used in a family car), as it can run at full power for the whole time that the train is away from the wires.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
13,435
Location
Bristol
Sure. And a battery EMU with a diesel range extender only needs a tiny diesel engine (about the size and weight used in a family car), as it can run at full power for the whole time that the train is away from the wires.
Although if possible it would be better to avoid the need for any form of diesel (or even anything involving a fuel tank) because of the additional costs associated with having a fuel supply chain - transporting, storing, and handling fuel are all a big fire risk and subject to environmental controls.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,225
Although if possible it would be better to avoid the need for any form of diesel (or even anything involving a fuel tank) because of the additional costs associated with having a fuel supply chain - transporting, storing, and handling fuel are all a big fire risk and subject to environmental controls.

Exactly. There must be a relatively simple way to work out how many additional kWh battery storage you can get for the weight of the engine, alternator, fuel tank, cooling system, exhaust system etc.

I often think about that for the now ‘not so new’ London Black Cabs; their range extender system must weigh about 200kg all up, and that’s about 30kWh which is enough for 100+ miles in London traffic, ie double their current elecric only range. Cant imagine there’s many black cabs doing more than 200 miles a day without being a break sufficient for a charge.
 

Maddog83

Member
Joined
4 Jun 2019
Messages
22
With the wires nearly complete north of Kettering, do we expect to see the return of the DATS train? Which was used extensively for testing the wires between Bedford and Corby not sure if it can be reformed. I'll assume they will have to test the OHLE somehow. Sorry if this has already been posted before.
 

londonmidland

Established Member
Joined
22 Dec 2009
Messages
1,837
Location
Leicester
With the wires nearly complete north of Kettering, do we expect to see the return of the DATS train? Which was used extensively for testing the wires between Bedford and Corby not sure if it can be reformed. I'll assume they will have to test the OHLE somehow. Sorry if this has already been posted before.
I believe we are. There’s already a Colas HST set at Leicester LIP, with a ROG 91 having some work being done to it.
 

Nottingham59

Established Member
Joined
10 Dec 2019
Messages
1,664
Location
Nottingham
Exactly. There must be a relatively simple way to work out how many additional kWh battery storage you can get for the weight of the engine, alternator, fuel tank, cooling system, exhaust system etc.

I often think about that for the now ‘not so new’ London Black Cabs; their range extender system must weigh about 200kg all up, and that’s about 30kWh which is enough for 100+ miles in London traffic, ie double their current elecric only range. Cant imagine there’s many black cabs doing more than 200 miles a day without being a break sufficient for a charge.
I understand the LEVC TX electric only range is 78 miles. With the extender, the combined range goes up to 333 miles. That sounds a bargain to me. That 200kg to give you 250 miles of extra range will weigh much less than the batteries that gave you the first 78 miles on electric only.

By all means size the batteries of a BEMU to allow electric-only operation in normal service. But to cover cases where a line gets blocked and the train has to return to origin, or to take a non-electrified diversion, then you need twice that "normal" range. The cheapest and lightest way to achieve that extra capability is a diesel range extender.

Once MML electrification is completed, I'd expect that all passenger services out of Nottingham could be EMU or BEMU. But routes to Cleethorpes and Cardiff would need range extenders in everyday use; trains to Norwich and Skegness would need that capability for emergencies; and trains to London would still need diesel capability for diversions.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,225
I understand the LEVC TX electric only range is 78 miles.

Off topic (sorry mods!) it’s 78 WLTP, but 101 miles in city driving, which is what most of the black cabs do.

Back to rail applications, a typical gen set on an 810 will weigh, what, 8 tonnes? But I’m reasonably sure the wires will be put up throughout to Sheffiled without the need for batteries or diesel engines to cross the gaps.
 

Nottingham59

Established Member
Joined
10 Dec 2019
Messages
1,664
Location
Nottingham
Back to rail applications, a typical gen set on an 810 will weigh, what, 8 tonnes?
I wouldn't be surprised, but those are 1000HP diesel engines. Range extenders for 100mph BEMUs would only need to be a tenth of that size.

But I’m reasonably sure the wires will be put up throughout to Sheffiled without the need for batteries or diesel engines to cross the gaps.
I think it's a fair assumption that the wires will get all the way to Sheffield - eventually. Despite the rotten economics, which only deliver a financial return if the OHLE is used also for recharging BEMUs on other services.

(And rather makes four 1000HP diesel engines on an 810 a bit of overkill, especially given all the extra costs incurred redesigning the underfloor layout to accommodate four engines in a space planned for three.)
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
67,917
Location
Yorkshire
A reminder that this thread is for the discussion of progress updates regarding MML electrification, please.

If anyone wants to discuss anything else, such as rolling stock updates, or anything speculative in nature, please either start a new thread or find an existing one.

Many thanks :)
 

InTheEastMids

Member
Joined
31 Jan 2016
Messages
735
Will the three arches bridge be replaced with a new structure or is this crossing not used anymore?
Although Network Rail did gain prior approval to replace the bridge with a similar structure (as they've done elsewhere for the scheme), I think it is now simply being demolished
 

Nottingham59

Established Member
Joined
10 Dec 2019
Messages
1,664
Location
Nottingham
Although Network Rail did gain prior approval to replace the bridge with a similar structure (as they've done elsewhere for the scheme), I think it is now simply being demolished
Presumably this is just an accommodation bridge to connect the land on each side of the railway. And since that land now belongs to National Grid or NR, who also built a separate access road, there is no legal requirement to reinstate the bridge.
 

PJM

Member
Joined
20 Aug 2021
Messages
165
Location
Market Harborough
From the Horses Mouth!

Three Arches Bridge OB:34
description
SPC3 81m 601yds

This bridge will be demolished in February 2024.

We will be working during the day and overnight, from: Thursday 1 – Thursday 29 February 2024.

A little delayed.
 

InOban

Established Member
Joined
12 Mar 2017
Messages
4,223
If they're demolishing this week, what are they doing between the 29th and the end of June ?
 

Edvid

Established Member
Joined
7 Feb 2008
Messages
1,340
If they're demolishing this week, what are they doing between the 29th and the end of June ?
I don't believe the demolition will take place before the 18/19 May possession. (There's also a possession due on 8/9 June - would allow for a replacement bridge if that's still planned).

From the Horses Mouth!

Three Arches Bridge OB:34
description
SPC3 81m 601yds

This bridge will be demolished in February 2024.

We will be working during the day and overnight, from: Thursday 1 – Thursday 29 February 2024.

A little delayed.
It was originally planned for September 2023, if not earlier (post #6394).
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,474
If they're demolishing this week, what are they doing between the 29th and the end of June ?
Road and footpath closures often seem to be agreed for much longer than needed, it probably saves having to go back to the local authority if there are delays.
 

snowball

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2013
Messages
7,754
Location
Leeds
Press release on the Kibworth bridge reported in this thread last week:


A new footbridge over the railway line in Kibworth has opened which will allow Network Rail engineers to continue to electrify the Midland Main Line.

Engineers have installed a new footbridge on School Road in Kibworth to enable overhead wires to pass underneath, resulting in a greener, quieter, and faster railway for passengers.

The original School Road bridge had to be demolished as it was not tall enough for electric wires to safely pass underneath, with its new replacement now at the required height.

The wires will eventually power East Midlands Railway’s new bi-mode trains through the area as part of the Midland Main Line upgrade.

A temporary footbridge was installed to make sure residents could access shops and local schools safely whilst the work on the permanent bridge was ongoing.

Network Rail has also successfully completed work at Wistow Road bridge in Newton Harcourt, however Leicestershire County Council has retained the road closure at the site while work is completed in other areas.

Work is continuing at Newton Lane Bridge in Newton Harcourt to rebuild the structure to a height where overhead wires can pass underneath with an estimated completion date of mid-June.

Gavin Crook, Principal Programme Sponsor for Network Rail’s East Midlands Route, said: “I am delighted that work has been completed on the installation of a new footbridge in Kibworth. This is a vital link in the village and this new structure will provide safe access across the Midland Main Line for years to come.

“The work we have completed at School Road bridge and at other sites in the area will allow overhead wires to pass underneath the bridge, leading to smoother, greener journeys for passengers along our East Midlands route.

“I would like to thank local residents for their patience and understanding while the work was ongoing.”



----------------------- automerge ----------------



The May Modern Railways has a third of a page on MML on page 11. Beginning with what may be the same parliamentary answer mentioned in #6996 back in February it says electrification to Sheffield and Nottingham "could" be completed "in the early 2030s".

The upgrades to the equipment south of Bedford are due to be completed in 2025.

It goes on to say "Network Rail is continuing funded design and pre-construction work between Wigston Junction north towards Trent Junction, a further 28.4 miles."

"Design work as far as Trent Junction is largely complete, and it is understood that this has shown it will be possible to install continuous overhead wires through Leicester station. The low height of the bridge on which on which the station building stands, coupled with the presence of sewers limiting the ability to lower the tracks, had raised fears installing wires here would not be possible, but these have proved unfounded, though space is tight. The MML scheme is aiming to learn lessons from previous wiring programmes and to harness technologies which enable more efficient delivery, such as the use of voltage control clearances. As an example, on GW electrification 37% of bridges were rebuilt (some of which are on stretches where electrification was subsequently cancelled), but designs for the MML north of Market Harborough suggest just 13% of structures would require similar interventions."
 
Last edited:

ABB125

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2016
Messages
3,771
Location
University of Birmingham
As an example, on GW electrification 37% of bridges were rebuilt (some of which are on stretches where electrification was subsequently cancelled), but designs for the MML north of Market Harborough suggest just 13% of structures would require similar interventions."
Does this take into account any bridges which were rebuilt before the MML electrification was cancelled? Ie: bridges which were rebuilt then, so don't need to be rebuilt this time around
 

Snow1964

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2019
Messages
6,295
Location
West Wiltshire
"Design work as far as Trent Junction is largely complete, and it is understood that this has shown it will be possible to install continuous overhead wires through Leicester station. The low height of the bridge on which on which the station building stands, coupled with the presence of sewers limiting the ability to lower the tracks, had raised fears installing wires here would not be possible, but these have proved unfounded, though space is tight. The MML scheme is aiming to learn lessons from previous wiring programmes and to harness technologies which enable more efficient delivery, such as the use of voltage control clearances.
I think the Swiss have done fair bit of work developing bar conductors instead of overhead wires where clearances are limited

They can effectively be composite, with conductor at bottom, and upper part insulating, including 'wings' sticking out each side to avoid drips and ice shorting. I suspect the development of these slim fixed systems has become option for locations like Leicester.

The link has various photos of these kind of systems for those not familiar with them (examples, doesn't mean they are being used)

 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
24,946
Location
Nottingham
I think the Swiss have done fair bit of work developing bar conductors instead of overhead wires where clearances are limited

They can effectively be composite, with conductor at bottom, and upper part insulating, including 'wings' sticking out each side to avoid drips and ice shorting. I suspect the development of these slim fixed systems has become option for locations like Leicester.

The link has various photos of these kind of systems for those not familiar with them (examples, doesn't mean they are being used)

These were used in the Severn Tunnel, not entirely successfully, so I imagine the MML teams are aware of the benefits and risks.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,474
"Design work as far as Trent Junction is largely complete, and it is understood that this has shown it will be possible to install continuous overhead wires through Leicester station. The low height of the bridge on which on which the station building stands, coupled with the presence of sewers limiting the ability to lower the tracks, had raised fears installing wires here would not be possible, but these have proved unfounded, though space is tight.
I’m fairly sure this positive view has been reported in Modern Railways before, but it regularly gets highlighted as a major issue in forum posts. So maybe they’ll wire through Leicester in a logical sequence without leaving a gap after all…
 

hwl

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2012
Messages
7,403
I’m fairly sure this positive view has been reported in Modern Railways before, but it regularly gets highlighted as a major issue in forum posts. So maybe they’ll wire through Leicester in a logical sequence without leaving a gap after all…
It regularly gets debunked on the forum too but lot of people don't listen and just repeat it.
 

Mordac

Established Member
Joined
5 Mar 2016
Messages
2,309
Location
Birmingham
I’m fairly sure this positive view has been reported in Modern Railways before, but it regularly gets highlighted as a major issue in forum posts. So maybe they’ll wire through Leicester in a logical sequence without leaving a gap after all…
I wonder if they could do the same thing in the tunnel between Moor Street and Snow Hill were that ever to be electrified. Looks very tight from the Moor St platforms.
 

hwl

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2012
Messages
7,403
I think the Swiss have done fair bit of work developing bar conductors instead of overhead wires where clearances are limited

They can effectively be composite, with conductor at bottom, and upper part insulating, including 'wings' sticking out each side to avoid drips and ice shorting. I suspect the development of these slim fixed systems has become option for locations like Leicester.

The link has various photos of these kind of systems for those not familiar with them (examples, doesn't mean they are being used)

NR also have plenty of experience with fibreglass rods for support arms for short challenging sections e.g. Thameslink core available from at least two manufacturers via Unipart
 

InTheEastMids

Member
Joined
31 Jan 2016
Messages
735
I'm almost certain a good number between Syston & Trent Jns were previously rebuilt.
Yes, you can use Google Street View to work it out in most cases, because this was done around 2015-ish and most locations have imagery before and after that date
Planning Portals can also help you find them as Network Rail do need to show the local planning authority that their proposal is within their permitted development powers.
They definitely rebuilt a bridge at Sutton Bonington.

I’m fairly sure this positive view has been reported in Modern Railways before, but it regularly gets highlighted as a major issue in forum posts. So maybe they’ll wire through Leicester in a logical sequence without leaving a gap after all…
I think the reason for skipping Leicester was also about a Syston-Wigston capacity scheme which was being talked about
I don't that's progressed since the pandemic, except any bits that are part of Midlands Connect projects

It regularly gets debunked on the forum too but lot of people don't listen and just repeat it.
100%. I think there's posts from well-informed members as far back as 2019 saying that Leicester station wasn't a show-stopper.
 

Top